Can you solve this Mystry?
- Thread starter Muslimz
- Start date
ahmed_indian
to Allah we belong
i m very poor in puzzles! i did not even understand it 
fatima1994
ƒ3!RY $p!r!T
Try solving this ( hope puzzles are allowed in this section)
umm i dunno how to xplain it but i figured out the puzzle
Lookingforlight
Slave of Allah
Its amazing...
PrincessTheMoon
Light Upon Light
Seeking Allah's Mercy
Qul HuwaAllahu Ahud!
mind boggling...............
revert2007
Love Fishing
The key is that the two triangles
aren't similar
the reason a blank white square appears in the bottom
diagram is that in the top diagram, the green right triangle at the
top and the red right triangle at the bottom are not similar
triangles. As a result, the area of the entire figure does not remain
the same when you move the two triangles.
This refers to the top diagram: The acute
angle at the bottom left of the top green triangle is
tan(beta) = 2/5,
and the acute angle at the bottom left of the larger red
triangle at the bottom is
tan(alpha) = 3/8.
Put another way, the two smaller sides of the smaller green triangle
are 2:5, but the ratio of the sides of the larger red one is 3:8.
Clearly, 2:5 =/= 3:8, and the red and green triangles are not similar.
Why should this matter? Because if the red and green right triangles
were similar, you could place the green one at the bottom left and the
red one at the top right, and leave no blank white square when you
moved the orange figure. But the triangles are not similar, so when
you place the green one in the lower position and the red one in the
higher position, you decrease the total area of the larger triangle
that contains the red and green triangle and the other orange figure.
for the two triangles to actually
act as you see on that site, the big triangle that contains both of
them (as well as the orange figure) would have to have a curved,
concave-shaped hypotenuse in one case and a curved, convex-shaped
hypotenuse in the other.
source
p.s:am not too smart for hard work but am smart for SMART work lol
aren't similar
the reason a blank white square appears in the bottom
diagram is that in the top diagram, the green right triangle at the
top and the red right triangle at the bottom are not similar
triangles. As a result, the area of the entire figure does not remain
the same when you move the two triangles.
This refers to the top diagram: The acute
angle at the bottom left of the top green triangle is
tan(beta) = 2/5,
and the acute angle at the bottom left of the larger red
triangle at the bottom is
tan(alpha) = 3/8.
Put another way, the two smaller sides of the smaller green triangle
are 2:5, but the ratio of the sides of the larger red one is 3:8.
Clearly, 2:5 =/= 3:8, and the red and green triangles are not similar.
Why should this matter? Because if the red and green right triangles
were similar, you could place the green one at the bottom left and the
red one at the top right, and leave no blank white square when you
moved the orange figure. But the triangles are not similar, so when
you place the green one in the lower position and the red one in the
higher position, you decrease the total area of the larger triangle
that contains the red and green triangle and the other orange figure.
for the two triangles to actually
act as you see on that site, the big triangle that contains both of
them (as well as the orange figure) would have to have a curved,
concave-shaped hypotenuse in one case and a curved, convex-shaped
hypotenuse in the other.
source
p.s:am not too smart for hard work but am smart for SMART work lol
allah is with me
Rabana Wa laqal Hamd
i dont know
abu'muhammad
Junior Member
:salam2:
thnx for the puzzle.
Both triangles have same areas yet arrangements make different shapes.
In the first arrangement orange figure is over the green figure that makes figures balanced or even. The two slots of orange figure gets fitted in three slots of green figure. This makes 3 lines of 5 squares in vertical manner , in all 15 squares .
In the second arrangement orange figure is on the side of green figure making 2 lines of 8 squares in horizontal manner, making space of 16 squares, but there are in all 15 squares no matter how squares of orange and green figures counted. This extra space of 1 square leave a gap in second arrangement.
This is due to different geometrical arrangements, As in figure 1 the other coloured figures touch red figure from the side of ‘height of red figure’. In figure 2 the other coloured figures touch red figure from ‘side of base of red figure’. This changes the arrangement of constituent figures giving variety in shape. Still the figures could be arranged into further different arrangements although the areas of triangles remaining same in all arrangements. so net no loss no gain in areas of figures but a change in geometrical shape.
:salam2:
thnx for the puzzle.
Both triangles have same areas yet arrangements make different shapes.
In the first arrangement orange figure is over the green figure that makes figures balanced or even. The two slots of orange figure gets fitted in three slots of green figure. This makes 3 lines of 5 squares in vertical manner , in all 15 squares .
In the second arrangement orange figure is on the side of green figure making 2 lines of 8 squares in horizontal manner, making space of 16 squares, but there are in all 15 squares no matter how squares of orange and green figures counted. This extra space of 1 square leave a gap in second arrangement.
This is due to different geometrical arrangements, As in figure 1 the other coloured figures touch red figure from the side of ‘height of red figure’. In figure 2 the other coloured figures touch red figure from ‘side of base of red figure’. This changes the arrangement of constituent figures giving variety in shape. Still the figures could be arranged into further different arrangements although the areas of triangles remaining same in all arrangements. so net no loss no gain in areas of figures but a change in geometrical shape.
:salam2: