News Exclusive: Top North Korean will use nukes if the U.S. "forced their hand."

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
Assalamu'alaikum!
greeting.
CNN
Updated 1623 GMT (2323 HKT) May 7, 2015
Exclusive: North Korea would use nukes if 'forced,' official says.

Pyongyang, North Korea (CNN)When officials informed us that we'd be granted a sit-down interview with a high-ranking member of North Korea's inner circle with no preconditions, it was a real surprise.
Senior figures in Pyongyang don't do interviews, especially not with the international press.
"I do not like talking to foreign media," Park Yong Chol said frankly as we shook hands ahead of our meeting. He said that we report rumor and fabrication about his country.
Park is the deputy director of the DPRK Institute for Research into National Reunification -- a think tank with links to the highest levels of North Korea's government.
In spite of his misgivings, he sat down to talk with us beneath the ubiquitous portraits of late North Korean leaders Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il. Our conversation lasted nearly two hours and no topic was off limits.
The only instruction we were given was to break from our traditional CNN interview format of two chairs facing each other, so that we could sit across a large conference table, and so that the two portraits of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il could be seen directly over Park. We agreed to do this, as our government guides explained the symbolism of the Great Leaders appearing overhead was very important to their country.
We quickly got onto a touchy subject: the recent reports from South Korea's National Intelligence Agency that Kim Jong Un had personally ordered the execution of about 15 so far this year.
"Malicious slander!" he replied. "Especially as they try to link the allegations against to the august name of our Supreme Leader Marshall Kim Jong Un."
But he did not deny that executions take place here of those who try to overthrow the government or subvert the system. "It is very normal for any country to go after hostile elements and punish them and execute them."
Rights abuses
And even though a recent United Nations report has alleged large-scale human rights abuses -- murder, starvation and torture of inmates in a network of brutal prison camps -- Park denied that such camps exist. He said although there were correction reform centers for ordinary criminals, political prison camps simply did not exist. "Our society is a society without political strife or factions or political divisions -- as a result we don't have the term 'political prisoner,'" he added.
According to Park, these allegations come from defectors who are enticed or forced into defecting by the U.S. and South Korea. "Some of the so-called defectors are criminals who ran away from their homes. They committed crimes against the state here. Because of that they ran away.
"And now they are in South Korea denouncing our government because they have no other choice."
In his view, there is no single yardstick for human rights applicable to every country.
"If you talk about human rights in my country, I will talk about human rights in the United States," he said. "You have racial riots taking place in the wake of the killing of so many black people by the police. You have prisons full of inmates and new techniques of torture being used.
"The U.S. President and other high-ranking administration officials have acknowledged really severe forms of punishment on inmates in detention. If you talk about human rights in the DPRK, we will talk about human rights in the U.S."
Nuclear option
In spite of all the sanctions, the DPRK sees no option but to pursue its nuclear weapons program. Park maintained that his country does indeed have the missile capability to strike mainland United States and would do so if the U.S. "forced their hand."
It has been a costly strategy, but a necessary one, he admitted. "We invested a lot of money in our nuclear defense to counter the U.S. threat -- huge sums that could have been spent in other sectors to improve our national economy. But this strategic decision was the right one."
"We're a major power politically, ideologically and militarily," he said. "The last remaining objective is to make the DPRK a strong economic power."
But to do that North Korea would have to improve ties with the international community.
With mutual distrust and Pyongyang's refusal to disarm its nuclear arsenal, there seems to be no clear path to moving forward.
~News.
Thank you for reading.
Take care,
~Wassalam
 

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
While North Korea is officially a nuclear nation, its arsenal is very small and as an embryonic member to the 'Big Eight' (those with atomic weapons), it is still behind in terms of missile systems, surveillance, monitoring, surface to surface weapons and even financial support in the event of a showdown or actual war.

Today, the North Korean economy is bankrupt, there is little or no electricity after 6.00pm everyday and the vast majority of people live on rations with most of the country's GDP being spent on the capital and the military. The population and birth rate is smaller than South Korea, but the standard of living is diametrically poorer with more people wishing to and trying to leave every year.

The North Korean Gulag system [most inmates are ordinary North Koreans and families with no crimes under the belt] is among the worst in the world and one of the most feared with virtually no hope of escape other than death itself.

There are no sanctions on the North, no embargoes and no physical restrictions on economic growth, but the forecast for being a pariah state with no real development continues to remain sad and defective.

The country is so heavily censored with security rigidly enforced on fear, manipulation and systematic oligarchical control that no real change can occur. The Military is the only institution that seems to grow and has seen developments in infrastructure, modernisation and strike power, but at an enormous cost and at an unsustainable rate and exertion upon the people.
 

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
I have no issue with both country but ALL of North Korea Nuke program a successful and had confirmed estimation that can reach as far as United States!
 

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
I have no issue with both country but ALL of North Korea Nuke program a successful and had confirmed estimation that can reach as far as United States!

Even if what you say is true, the strike effectiveness of the North for a first nuclear attack on the US will not result in a full or even partial destruction of America. The US has a land area ten times the size of the North and a population equal to that. The North's nuclear weapons may reach the US but the mass area it can destroy is restricted to less than 20% of the country, irrespective of where strikes; the east, the west, the north or the south. The US may take some time to recover, but recover it can and launch a more effective retaliatory strike.

Before it reaches the US, the Americans can send a larger segment of atomic weapons, ballistic and surface to surface missiles that carry an assortment of warheads of different ranges, firepower and devastation from its bases close to North Korea that can wipe out the country in a first strike.

In addition, the US can launch an invasion from the South where 30-40, 000 soldiers are based for mop op operations once there is no North Korea left after the nuclear explosions. They will be joined by what is left of South Korea (if it still exists), Australia, NZ, Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Russia as the immediate neighbours in the region and assume control of what was once North Korea.

As a modern 'weapons state', the US and its allies believe in air power over ground forces and as such will initiate an air campaign of perhaps up to 100, 000 'sorties' (calculated and co ordinated air strikes on military and civilian targets) before the marines and later the regular armies are sent in to knock out all remaining opposition. Once a successful invasion is complete, they will be joined by the rest of the 'allies' in the form of the UK, France, Germany, Italy etc. to complete the occupation and secure 'peace' as it were.

The above is what the North knows and expects. Memoirs of retired American personnel, diplomats, former ambassadors, envoys and UN staff who know the country well and have seen for themselves what the North's capabilities, actual strength and economic situation support these assertions. In private circles, existing US envoys state that the North is made out to be a larger and more tougher adversary than it actually is for the sake of image alone [the US Image of being the worlds policeman, not the North's image].

Unlike India, Pakistan, Israel, Iran (and South Africa until the 1990s) North Korea was a signatory to the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT) until 2003 and if you look at the agreements signed between the UN and the North, the differences are over minor points of law, but made to look to great for publicity and international standing. The US has unofficially accepted the North as a nuclear weapons state but ruled out a first strike and first invasion [it will only be in retaliation]. It unofficially has also accepted it cannot treat the North the way it has treated Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia. It has a certain amount of respect for the North the way it can never have for Muslim countries but it is still an adversary and due to image, it must treat the North as an enemy, even if it means inflating their threat to make them look like supervillains who are out to destroy the whole world.
 
Last edited:

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
True brother,
but those nukes and rockets are multiple not just one and the impact that bears after that surely it hard to imagine and brother if you must know, North Korea has clans too like China,Russia,Iran and only Allah swt knows who else that stands by them like 'all for one and one for all' .
 

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
True brother,
but those nukes and rockets are multiple not just one and the impact that bears after that surely it hard to imagine and brother if you must know, North Korea has clans too like China,Russia,Iran and only Allah swt knows who else that stands by them like 'all for one and one for all' .

Jazakallah Khayrun Sister. May Allah reward you for your information and your intentions. I was never arguing with you, just supplementing the details on the thread and adding to your own knowledge for the benefit of the readers.

As you mentioned, a 'first strike' does not mean one nuclear warhead but a set or stream of rockets and missiles to a target area; in this instance towards the USA. My point was unlike the 1950s when the two countries last went to war; the following areas have since made a 'first strike' implausible by both sides, at least in theory;

Detection [by the other side]

Time variance by either nation [the period needed to make a second strike and the time required to respond to the first and other strikes].

Location: While the US has air bases in at least thirty nations, some of whom have consented to nuclear weapons being stationed on their soil and are close in proximity to the North, the communist nation in contrast has no sites where nuclear facilities are in operation other than in its own country.

Reserves and manpower: The US on its own has over 2 million servicemen on its soil in addition to tens of thousands more across the globe. An air force of over 700, 000 with at least six thousand aircraft, reserves in excess of 1 million more and between ten to twenty-five thousand nuclear warheads.

As a powerful nation in its right, in contrast the North has almost two million servicemen, most of whom are in the army, an air force of 110, 000 with up to 1, 800 aircraft, reserves of more than a million soldiers and up to thirty nuclear warheads to its name.

The last point is impressive given that it only became a nuclear arms state within the last ten years and has no active suppliers of components or assistance from other nations over maintenance, base of operations, help towards cost or scientific knowledge from outside its own borders.

Alliances [of North Korea]. Since the 1970s, the North has become closer to socialist nations and some south east Asian communist nations, namely Vietnam from the latter and Cambodia, Laos and I believe also Myanmar among the former. While none of these nations have the capacity, the means in supporting the North, they at least do have sympathy and state alignment of interests based on common ground.

Unfortunately for Muslims, the North is no friend of Islam. While it has no Islamic community of its own within its frontiers to speak of to oppress and has no open hatred of any religion, it is an active supporter of Arab Socialism as well. Here I am referring to Bashar Al Assad and the Ba'ath Party in Syria; which translated means 'Arab Socialist'. The North sympathises with Assad and has allowed any member of the North Korean military to go to Syria as volunteers and support him. There is a sizeable number of Korean soldiers already present in Syria and no doubt this will increase with time.

In respect to your last points over devastation of land mass and clans. You are correct in your estimation and analysis. Since no 'official' nuclear strikes have occurred since 1945 [if Vietnam, Malaysia, Algeria, Korea and other nations can be 'written off' the way they have been over the use of Agent Orange, Agent Blue, Napalm and others] future first, second, third and additional strikes are calculated based on power, size and other matters related to individual atomic arsenals of the host country. From these estimates I gave you what the US and other analysts suggest will happen in the event of a North Korean first strike. As to 'clans', I personally have no knowledge of them, but since you do I am willing to accept their existence.
 

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
The quotation below is from a former member of the US government reminiscing over his experiences and the Imperial age of US rule. While the book from where the quote is from is outdated, some of the facts stated are not that different to today.

"The more than a million American troops stationed on some four hundred major and almost three thousand minor United States military bases scattered all over the globe, the forty-two nations tied to the United States by security pacts, the American military missions training the officers and troops of many other national armies, and the approximately two hundred thousand United States civilian government employees in foreign posts all make for striking analogies to the great classical imperial systems." (Source: 'Between Two Ages, America's Role in the Technetronic Era' by Zbigniew Brzezinski, P 18, 1970)

Further on in the same book, he adds a specialist has this to say about weapons technology by 2018; three years from now.

"By the year 2018, technology will make available to the leaders of the major nations a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised.

One nation may attack a competitor covertly by bacteriological means, thoroughly weakening the population (though with a minimum of fatalities) before taking over with its own overt armed forces. Alternatively, techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a nation's capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor" (Source: Gordon J. F. MacDonald, Space," in
Toward the Year 2018, P 34)
 
Last edited:

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
thanks sharing this information here brother :jazaak:

Jazakallah Khayrun for allowing me the opportunity to share my ideas, information and analysis of the topic. From now on however, I will not digress from the subject matter of the topic into other areas regarding North Korea.

I will remain focussed on the specific nature of the thread itself in the regular forums. I will say what I have to say in greater depth and detail within the Brothers section thread about North Korea instead.
 

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
Jazakallah Khayrun for allowing me the opportunity to share my ideas, information and analysis of the topic. From now on however, I will not digress from the subject matter of the topic into other areas regarding North Korea.

I will remain focussed on the specific nature of the thread itself in the regular forums. I will say what I have to say in greater depth and detail within the Brothers section thread about North Korea instead.
pardon me, brother if I may ask... why? Are we sisters not suitable enough to talk issues on politics ? :p
 

Abu Juwairiya

Junior Member
Are we sisters not suitable enough to talk issues on politics ? [/quote]

Assalammu Alaikum Sister Queen Islam and Jazakallah Khayrun for your question. If I thought that politics as a subject is or should be restricted to brothers alone, I would not have said as much as I have to date both on North Korea and in other similar topics in the regular and general forums open to everyone.

It’s just that I wanted to speak about more than just one area of a subject rather than the specific topic within a thread and I don't want to both bore and confuse you with additional details and divergence from the original story. Nothing more. No offence was intended.

In the North Korea thread for example I spoke equally as long about the North Korean Military as I did about nuclear weapons, and while no one said anything, I had actually strayed far from the topic and even actual relevance. I opened a thread about North Korea in the Brothers section where I can talk about other themes as well, that’s all.
 

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
~Wa'alaikumussalam ,
Nice brother, thanks for the excuse .we understand don't worry :)
~Wassalam :)
 
Top