The reason I brought in Shia issue because you seem to brand me as having sectarian mentality or being "religious zealot" by opposing this nuke issue. If you think this nuke technology is not a threat, you have to consider Khomeini's threat to invade Madinah and Mecca before you jumping into conclusion. Perhaps Iran is not making a bombs, but the nuke technology do create chaos in the region in particular after Khomeini statement who is a revered figure among Shia. You have to discuss this issue holistically to find the truth, if you think we should focus on nuke tech, then stop making statement that some muslims being religious zealots, if you do then I pull other issues as well. The other reasons is I want you to know that I'm doing a lot of things, I do condemn Shia and I do welcome dialogues with them. That's does not making me a zealot. I don't know about you, I write here and also doing dawah. Okay, let's me stop here before people may start calling me being boasting about own. Although you explain that you are not saying it is me, you did made a general comment about muslims being sectarian or religious zealots. Religious zealots can't even called as true muslim. My family majority are hindus, these community still calling Muslims as zealots or fanatics, will that make any difference if a muslim also calling the same against muslims?
Focusing on the debate, whether Iran building nuke bombs or not does not matter already, I made my comments and you made yours. My comments stand to be corrected and open to criticism, I will take responsibility for any errors. I believe you know you are right. Since you feel you are right, then you always right (just borrow from the phrase "customer is always right"). There is great debate about the safety of nuclear technology it self, those debating not only from third world as well from 1st world. Tragedies in Russia and recently Japan need no proof, that this technology is not safe. Let alone nuke bombs, but Iran is not making one according to you, let accept it that they are not making one in fact I repeat this is my wish. If they really not making it, let me tell you I will be most happy and most welcome. But it is also alarming to me why oil rich Iran is developing this technology? Perhaps their oil wells are drying up.
Now you also made another generalise statement about me that I'm preventing a country progressing and developing by opposing they nuke technology, which I claimed they are also building nuke bombs. Iran did sent rocket into orbits and they do develop other technologies, they come here for business expo and shows how much they have advanced. Did I ever said Iran should stop sending rocket into orbit? Stopping a technology which I feel is not safe which also a step away to make nuke bombs can not be said preventing advancement. Hilarious. You also welcome UAE to build their own nuclear technology if they wish, whether for peaceful means or to make bombs as sovereign state, again you support something is a threat to mankind and environment. I can't stop you supporting such dangerous technology, but you can't stop me by saying I oppose this technology. This technology just a step towards making nuke bombs and the technology itself not safe. No one can guarantee this technology will not be converted into making nuke bombs. So prevention is better than cure.
Quote: "With foriegn intervention in the region, the Muslim Ummah will not be able to move forward and will always be under UN police control, therefore it is the foriegn entities that are a threat and not scientific Iran." Unquote
Totally agreed, however nuke technology or nuke bombs is not the answer. Unity is the answer. Since Iran nuke tech seen as threat for unity among the gulf nations, my humble opinion is that Iran should discard this technology or listen to what her neighbours are worried. Likewise, I also urge GCC to send US and their allies troops back home, they must be longing enough their families at home and close the bases or take over the bases.