MUSLIMS HIT AT RETAILERS OVER LABELLING OF PIGSKIN

:salam2:
MUSLIMS HIT AT RETAILERS OVER LABELLING OF PIGSKIN
*Warnings should be much more prominent, says MJC*

The Muslim Judicial Council has hit out at leading clothing stores for failing to clearly indicate

leather and suede garments made of pigskin. Muslims may not eat pork or touch items made from pigskin.

But a Cape Argus survey found that Edgars, Truworths, Foschini, and Woolworths, which enjoy a high level of Muslim support, often the only pointer to such clothing is inside the garment or on a swing ticket attached to the price tag. This could not be seen before the garment had been touched. Shamiela Hassiem of Athlone unknowingly bought a pigskin jacket from Woolworths recently. She discovered it was pigskin only after deciding to check the care instructions inside.

"There was absolutely no way I would wear it after I found out and I returned it. I didn't even want to touch it," she said.

Senior MJC member Moulana Yusuf Karaan said stores should be more sensitive towards Muslim customers. "It is the duty of the MJC, as the major halaal certifying body in the Cape, to contact these stores and suggest (that they) make more announcements to people regarding their goods made from pigskin, and to monitor the situation if possible," said Karaan. He also called on Muslim customers to make their voices heard. " They should insist that the managers

of the stores place notices in bold writing and in prominent places, with the purpose of warning

Muslims."

Woolworths spokeswoman Jolande Stoltz said the company was already doing this. " Our men's jacket have a swing ticket and the women's jackets a tag inside. In addition, we are putting up A4 signage above all our pigskin garments," she said.

Truworths, which occasionally imports pigskin garments, also has a swing tag policy.

Foschini group managing director Dennis Pollack said his stores shied away from stocking such clothing, but when it did so the items always had information on the outside. Edgars merchandise executive Veronique Shera said: "Sometimes the label is inside the garment, sometimes outside. It depends on the supplier. "It would obviously be preferable for all the clothing to be labelled on the outside as a safeguard."

Karaan said Hassiem had handled the situation correctly. "If a Muslim is ignorant of any clothing

being made from pigskin, there will be no sin attached to wearing it," he said.

"When they discover it to be pigskin, it will be incumbent on him or her to get rid of it immediately."

Jews are also prohibited from eating pork, but Chief Rabbi of South Africa, Cyril Harris said: "We can derive other benefits from the animal but prefer not to, as it would mean it would have suffered. "This applies to all leather. That is why, on Yom Kippur(Day of Atonement) we must abstain from wearing an such items."
 

Happy 2BA Muslim

Islamophilic
:jazaak: for letting us know.

Pigskin is najis (impure) and does not become taahir (pure) by means of tanning.

Simply touching something impure does not make the body impure, unless there is some wetness either in the impure substance or on the body.

Shaykh Ibn Jibreen said:

If the body or clothes are dry and touch something impure that is also dry, that does not matter, because the impurity is only transferred when it is wet. Fataawa Islamiyyah, 1/194

Based on this, the hand does not become impure simply by touching these gloves that are made of pigskin, unless the hand or the gloves are wet.

If the hands become impure by touching the pigskin when there is some wetness, then you have to wash your hands. It is sufficient to wash them once, because there is no command to wash something impure seven times, one of which is with dust or dirt, except in the case of impurity caused by a dog.

Some scholars likened the pig to the dog, so they said that one should wash seven times in the case of pig-related impurity, one of which should be with dust or dirt.

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “This is a weak analogy, because pigs are mentioned in the Qur’aan and they existed at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and there is no report which likens them to dogs. So the correct view is that pig-related impurity is like any other kind of impurity, and there is no need to wash seven times, one of which should be with dust or dirt.” Al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 1/356.

So the Muslim should strive to keep his body and clothes clean and pure, and avoid wearing these gloves that are made of pigskin, because that involves touching something impure and exposes his hands and clothes to the risk of becoming impure, which would affect the validity of his prayers. But if he needs to wear these gloves because he cannot find anything else, then it is permissible for him to wear them, so long as he is careful to avoid contaminating his body or clothes, and he hastens to wash off any impurity if he gets it on him, so that he does not transfer it anywhere else or forget to wash it off his hands or clothes.

There are permissible kinds of animal skins and leathers available which mean that there is no need for these impure types. We ask Allaah to help us to do that which He loves and which pleases Him. And Allaah knows best.
 

visionusman

being content
Although I agree that simply touching it, provided it is not wet, would not consitute an impurity to be imparted on our skin, I believe the labelling is still important. That is because we are not allowed to buy such products nor to use them. JazakAllah.
 
Top