Niqab Costs UK Muslim Juror Her Job

Aziboy

Banned
Niqab Costs UK Muslim Juror Her Job


UK%20Muslims%20court%20niqab1.JPG


In an unprecedented ruling in Britain, a Muslim woman was barred from serving on a jury for refusing to take off her face-veil (niqab), The Daily Mail reported Tuesday, March 20.

“I wonder whether I can address the lady who is veiled,” Judge Aidan Marron QC said.

The Muslim woman was to take the oath in a case at Blackfriars Crown Court in London when the judge asked her to remove her face-veil.

“Would you prefer not to remove your veil in this particular case?,” Judge Marron asked the Muslim woman.

“Yes”, the woman replied.

But the judge replied that it was “desirable” if she removed her face-veil in this case.

“So I’m going to invite you to stand down. I hope you understand.”
The ruling is unprecedented in British courts as official guidelines allow the wearing of veils in court.

According to guidelines from the Judicial Studies Board's equality advisory committee in 2007, Muslim women should be allowed to serve while wearing the veil as long as it did not interfere with the administration of justice.

"Each situation should be considered individually in order to find the best solution in each case," the guidelines said.

The committee warned that forcing a woman to choose between participating in a court case and removing her veil could have a “significant impact on that woman’s sense of dignity” and serve to “exclude and marginalize” her.

The guidelines also say a judge may wish to consider excusing jurors in niqabs if a challenge is made by one of the parties, provided there is a genuine basis for the objection.

Britain is home to a sizable Muslim minority of nearly 2.5 million.

Outrage

The unprecedented ruling has sparked outrage among British Muslims.

“This is totally unacceptable,” Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the Islamic Human Rights Commission, said.

“I really can’t understand why facial expressions could have any impact on the judge, the judgment or anyone else in a trial. It has no relevance.”

He warned that the ruling reflects prejudice against veiled Muslim women.
“I’m speechless that you can exclude someone on the basis of the way that they dress,” he said.

“It’s very worrying that a judge is being prejudiced against women wearing a veil.”

The face-veil, or niqab, has become the center of a heated debate across Europe in recent years.

The face-veil is a garment worn by some Muslim women that is often black, and covers the face but leaves the eyes uncovered.

The garment is already banned in France, Belgium and a city in Spain.

While hijab is an obligatory code of dress for Muslim women, the majority of Muslim scholars agree that a woman is not obliged to wear the veil.

Scholars, however, believe that it is up to women to decide whether to take on the face veil.
 

John Smith

Junior Member
Common sense would be if the woman never put herself in this position from the start.

The issue is do women need to where them in places where it will be controversial ie; Schools, banks, etc etc.

Sometime we make a rod for our own backs.

EDIT: Incoming............
 

user expired!

Junior Member
First of All- Jury service is mandtory in this country, and there is a possible fine for those who don't serve if you are summoned.

Second point- Yes women must wear it in all places that is required, for example in public or around men who are not immediate family if they believe that Niqab is fard.

and to your last comment, hmm................. interesting.
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

A juror can be excused on many grounds.

But, my question is simple. Remember this is coming from a woman. Why would I sit on a jury and use a law to make a decision that is other than Allah's and wear niqab. It does not equate.
 

John Smith

Junior Member
First of All- Jury service is mandtory in this country, and there is a possible fine for those who don't serve if you are summoned.

Second point- Yes women must wear it in all places that is required, for example in public or around men who are not immediate family if they believe that Niqab is fard.

and to your last comment, hmm................. interesting.

Point 1) Its also mandatory for a women in a western country to show her face in a court of law regardless of faith.

Point 2) What would a veil women be doing around men who are no her immediate family? why go to work in an enviroment where the culture is very open and free mixing is the norm?
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

It is so much easier to be in a world of sisters. You do not want to leave.
 

Aziboy

Banned
If this women is abiding to the administration of justice, she should show her face as there is no genuine reason for the objection.
 

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
:salam2:

~May Allah swt help,protect and guide all muslims~Amin!

Thank you for sharing this news
brother
:jazaak:

Take care,
~Wassalam
 
Top