By my wondering I was thinking basicly the social and political situations inside of some countries like in Pakistan but of course leaders want to silent many groups and people world wide. Ways to silent demands for juctice and human rights are various.
In some ways, it is also about political influence, the power of the lobby, interest groups, corporate domination and the patriarchal 'old boy network' that seeks to promote the status quo and quash smaller voices.
Pakistan and countries like it have little time for what I would call 'organised resistance groups' in the form of outreach organisations, pressure groups, registered charities and relief/welfare agencies that represent the poorest and most oppressed sections of the community. While the concept of a 'hearing' from the oppressed to an executive administration is present as a concept and right, it is virtually void there.
In the economic sphere, the landlord classes (organised and stabilised by the British Empire) are one such segment that exists to this day as an old order independent of governments which functions as facilitating its own interests over that of the majority and rural masses.
They oppose financial adjustments that will result in alleviating poverty, while major private enterprises by wealthier independent investors and successful native entrepreneurs oppose non monopolisation of industries due to reductions in profits. The consequences are rising prices, food shortages for those with small incomes, a proliferation of disease because of an inability to protect themselves and the curtailment of state welfare for the poorest populations.
In a social context, this means little or no representation in a private civil society, a heavily dominated male order against female participation and involvement in law, politics, religion, economics and further/higher education. Minority communities (different religions and ethnic minorities) are particularly side lined while those of the same religion are promised greater rights, but no pragmatic solutions and actual assistance.
At its extreme, the military assumes the major role in dealing with difficult groups. This can lead to insurgencies and in some case revolutions.
