Since the end of world war, US acted almost unilaterally in many of the conflicts across the globe. Mostly due to change in politics of 21st century, as business and politics has become so inseparable. This is coupled with access to and control of earth's resources by businesses.
Brother Tiaziz, I agree, since transnational corporate and commercial interests have increased, international agencies associated with relief, welfare and developmental assistance are now often associated with following 'free market, neoliberal and private enterprise'.
In short, this is loosely translated as monopolisation of indigenous industries by handpicked western firms, 'rolling back the state' at the expense of the state and for the benefit of small elites, both among natives and western conglomerates.
In relation to the US (and to a lesser extent the UK) and especially since the end of the Second World War, 'commercial enterprise' or to use the favoured term, 'free market' generates a healthy source of permanent income from those who have a significant proportion of purchasing power equivalent to some successful American or western multinational companies- governments.
This can be in the form of the defence industry where huge weapons sales are made to countries that are known to have insurrections and insurgent groups or the health industry where pharmaceutical companies will sell banned medicine in Europe with terrible side effects.
They don't have to be rich, just either gullible, selfish, irresponsible, dictatorial or even with no option in the matter but accept for survival alone. It is also often a combination of some of the above.
In the absence of accountability, enforceable indictable offences associated with corporatism and multinational global violations of human rights, there is little to facilitate prevention or reduce the negative forms of 'globalisation', which is another concept to sell western interests or to create credible alternatives that will work.
Historically speaking, Guyana in the 1950s, Iran in 1951-53, Guatemala in 1954, Cuba until 1959, The Congo in 1960, Ghana in 1966, Chile in 1973, El Salvador in the 1980s, Grenada in 1983 among several others are examples of American removal of legitimate governments for the benefit of western corporate interests.
In sum this represents the undemocratic interests of a non indigenous elite of wealthy foreign businesspeople taking precedence of the local majorities resulting in greater poverty, but the accumulation of huge capital for the offending parties. As you can see, it is a great avenue for making money and the ability to remove oneself from blame or criminal charges.