We should distinguish "respect of faith" and "uncritical belief in a faith". I can respect stone-worshipping, but not worship stones myself. I can also ask politely questions on a "stone-worshipping forum", if I want to understand this faith.
If they reply to me "you are arrogant or ignorant if you question the logic of stone-worshipping". They will look weird to me, who thinks (maybe wrongly) that stones cannot benefit nor harm me. But maybe they are just following the religion of their parents, and I can respect that.
So my opinion about some Muslims is that their attitude to religion is closer to Abraham's father than to Abraham himself. The "content" of their beliefs could be the same as Abraham's, but prophets are usually more remarkable by their attitude than by the content of their beliefs. This is why prophets made their society progress. And why some "scholars of deen" make their society stagnate. Same beliefs, but different attitudes.
When Muhammad faced metaphysical questions in his early fourties, he went to hira cave, meditating alone. He did not go to a priest or to a rabbi.
Personnally, when the illness is serious, I prefer to trust wikipedia. Trusting an encyclopedia written by a crowd of teenagers is more wise than trusting a doctor, who might not be up-to-date with recent medical literature (doctors use wikipedia anyway).
If you know someone with "knowledge of the deen" who wrote something interesting about the Geschwind syndrom, I am interested.
We live in the 21st century, not the 20th. Well-organized crowds can out-preform experts. If nobody on this forum shares this optimism about "the wisdom of the crowd", there is no reason to waste my time with this particular crowd, and I should look for a more optimistic crowd.
see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_of_the_crowd
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing_creative_work
Crowdsourcing creative work (CCW) is an open call to the crowd for novel and useful solutions. Crowdsourcing may be appropriate when experts are in scarce supply, multiple diverse ideas and/or contextual insights are needed.