Autism linked to being first born, or moms above 35

hafeezanwar

Junior Member
Autism linked to being first born, or moms above 35



Children who are first born or emerge with their feet first in breech birth or whose mothers are 35 or older, face greater risk of developing autism.

University of Utah School of Medicine researchers showed that women who give birth at 35 or older are 1.7 times more likely to have a child with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as compared to women between the ages of 20-34.

Autism is a complex brain disorder that impairs social, communicative, and behavioural development and is often characterized by extreme behaviour.

Children diagnosed with ASD also were nearly 1.8 times more likely to be the first born child, the researchers found.

Although they didn't identify a causal relationship between breech births and autism, children diagnosed with the disorder were more than twice as likely to have been a breech presentation, meaning they were not born head first.

"The results of this study give us an opportunity to look more closely at these risk factors for children across the autism spectrum," said study co-author Deborah A. Bilder, assistant professor of psychiatry, Utah University.

Bilder and colleagues examined the birth records of Utah children who had been identified as having autism spectrum disorder in a 2002 epidemiological study by the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said a Utah release.

These findings were published in the Monday online issue of Paediatrics.


--- IANS
 

drassim

استغفر الله العظيم
:salam2:

:jazaak: Thanks for sharing with us a beautiful thread.


May Allah :subhanallah: Guide us all to the right path. :tti_sister:


:wasalam:
 

shaheeda35

strive4Jannah
:salam2:
Jazakallahu Khairan for this information. My son has Autism and is 8 years old. He was not breech nor the first born...he is my third child. This is just what was written for him by Allah and a test for me more than for him.:blackhijab::SMILY252:
 

ShyHijabi

Junior Member
I researched why Dr. Wakefield was dismissed because I agreed with his opinion that vaccines should be spaced and sparingly used. He was actually dismissed for falsifying data and not following protocol in his research, something that can result in wrong conclusions.

I still agre with his medical opinion but I can see why he was disciplined in his research, it was unethical to alter data.
 

arzafar

Junior Member
thankfully the article identifies the difference between causation and correlation. The vast majority of such studies deal with correlation are therefore useless for predicting a particular case of autism. However, the correlation can predict the ratio of autism in newborns.
 
Top