Babri Masjid - Hindus have no nexus with Justice
The Allahabad High Court judgment is ridiculous on the face of it. If 1/3 of the premises were declared as Masjid then how the integral remaining premises was held to be distributed among the rival parties?
The premises could have been Masjid, mandir (hindu temple) or ukharha (wrestling training area). So when one third of the premises were held as Masjid then the remaining integral part could have not been held as anything else by any stretch of imagination. Were the conformist judges sightless, they could not see the onslaught of the Babri Masjid by the BJP terrorists in 1992 under the leadership of L K Advani made known by media all over the world?
The Allahabad High Court judgment is ridiculous on the face of it. If 1/3 of the premises were declared as Masjid then how the integral remaining premises was held to be distributed among the rival parties?
The premises could have been Masjid, mandir (hindu temple) or ukharha (wrestling training area). So when one third of the premises were held as Masjid then the remaining integral part could have not been held as anything else by any stretch of imagination. Were the conformist judges sightless, they could not see the onslaught of the Babri Masjid by the BJP terrorists in 1992 under the leadership of L K Advani made known by media all over the world?