is the koran to be understood literally?

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rosiee

Guest
in the catholic tradition there is both the bible and tradition. the bible is not to be taken literally. there is much internal debate and discussion about what scripture means and does not mean.there are exceptions...

is there a similar approach in Islam towards the koran?
is the koran vulnerable to many interpretations?
 

samiha

---------
Staff member
I'm afraid I don't understand your question.

The Quraan is ONE.

You see, any other translation of the QURAN is NOT the Quran, merely the translation. The Quran is only in the original Arabic language.

Now the Quran is so eloquent, the height of Arabic literature of that time, so the translations differ yes, because one word could have 3 meanings depending how you use it.
However, the Quran is one, so that you don't have to purify yourself before reading a translation, but you have to do it for the actual Quran.

But yes, if the Quranic command is direct, we follow it in it's absolute form. The word of God CAN'T be disobeyed, or changed, but must be followed directly.


That is the stance towards the Quran, whatever it says I will follow, God Willing. And may Allah help me towards fullfilling all His Commandments. Ameen.
 

Abu Sarah

Allahu Akbar
Staff member
Hello..
is there a similar approach in Islam towards the koran?
is the koran vulnerable to many interpretations?

This is a false and incorrect statement made by those who try to find faults with Islam so as to put people off this religion. It is sufficient to know that Allaah has guaranteed to preserve the Qur’aan,
as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Qur’aan) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption).”
[al-Hijr 15:9]

Moreover, the fact that the transmission of the Qur’aan by memory and in writing was mutawaatir – narrated by groups to groups [to such an extent that so many people could not conceivably have agreed upon a lie] – is well known to anyone who has the slightest acquaintance with Islamic knowledge, especially knowledge of recitations and reciters.

There are still many people nowadays who have learned the Qur’aan orally, with isnaads directly going back to the Prophet :saw: (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).
One of the miracles of Allaah’s protection of the Qur’aan is the fact that those who try to tamper with it are always found out.

The point is, everything that was revealed to the Prophet :saw: (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was written down in front of him straight away, and some of the Sahaabah had masaahif (written copies of the Qur’aan). After the death of the Prophet :saw: (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), the first khaleefah, Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him) gathered the Qur’aan in written and kept it. Then the third khaleefah, ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) compiled it in mus-hafs that were based on the mus-haf compiled by Abu Bakr, in addition to what had been memorized.

When we realize that the Qur’aan was written down and compiled by the Sahaabah, and ‘Uthmaan sent copies of the Mus-haf during his reign to all the main centres of Islam, so that it would be a reference for them, and there were no disputes concerning them, Moreover, there are several ancient manuscripts of the Qur’aan in libraries and museums which bear visible testimony to the fact that nothing has been changed in the Book of Allaah.

This is the Oldest Copy of the Noble Quran written in Madina before 1400 years ( Othman Copy ). Nowadays its saved in a museum in Turkey.

12.jpg






Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And verily, it is an honourable well?fortified respected Book (because it is Allaah’s Speech, and He has protected it from corruption). Falsehood cannot come to it from before it or behind it, (it is) sent down by the All?Wise, Worthy of all praise (Allaah).”

[Fussilat 41:41-42]

<wasalam>
 
Preservation and Authenticity of the Holy Quran
1. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself supervised and authenticated the written texts of the Qur’an

Whenever the Prophet received a revelation, he would first memorize it himself and later declare the revelation and instruct his Companions (R.A. – Radhi Allahu Taala Anhu) – May Allah be pleased with him who would also memorize it. The Prophet would immediately ask the scribes to write down the revelation he had received, and he would reconfirm and recheck it himself. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was an Ummi who could not read and write. Therefore, after receiving each revelation, he would repeat it to his Companions. They would write down the revelation, and he would recheck by asking them to read what they had written. If there was any mistake, the Prophet would immediately point it out and have it corrected and rechecked. Similarly he would even recheck and authenticate the portions of the Qur’an memorized by the Companions. In this way, the complete Qur’an was written down under the personal supervision of the prophet (pbuh).


2. Order and sequence of Qur’an divinely inspired


The complete Qur’an was revealed over a period of 22½ years portion by portion, as and when it was required. The Qur’an was not compiled by the Prophet in the chronological order of revelation. The order and sequence of the Qur’an too was Divinely inspired and was instructed to the Prophet by Allah (swt) through archangel Jibraeel. Whenever a revelation was conveyed to his companions, the Prophet would also mention in which surah (chapter) and after which ayat (verse) this new revelation should fit.

Every Ramadhaan all the portions of the Qur’an that had been revealed, including the order of the verses, were revised and reconfirmed by the Prophet with archangel Jibraeel. During the last Ramadhaan, before the demise of the Prophet, the Qur’an was rechecked and reconfirmed twice.

It is therefore clearly evident that the Qur’an was compiled and authenticated by the Prophet himself during his lifetime, both in the written form as well as in the memory of several of his Companions.


3. Qur’an copied on one common material


The complete Qur’an, along with the correct sequence of the verses, was present during the time of the Prophet (pbuh). The verses however, were written on separate pieces, scrapes of leather, thin flat stones, leaflets, palm branches, shoulder blades, etc. After the demise of the prophet, Abu Bakr (r.a.), the first caliph of Islam ordered that the Qur’an be copied from the various different materials on to a common material and place, which was in the shape of sheets. These were tied with strings so that nothing of the compilation was lost.


4. Usman (r.a.) made copies of the Qur’an from the original manuscript

Many Companions of the Prophet used to write down the revelation of the Qur’an on their own whenever they heard it from the lips of the Prophet. However what they wrote was not personally verified by the Prophet and thus could contain mistakes. All the verses revealed to the Prophet may not have been heard personally by all the Companions. There were high possibilities of different portions of the Qur’an being missed by different Companions. This gave rise to disputes among Muslims regarding the different contents of the Qur’an during the period of the third Caliph Usman (r.a.).

Usman (r.a.) borrowed the original manuscript of the Qur’an, which was authorized by the beloved Prophet (pbuh), from Hafsha (may Allah be pleased with her), the Prophet’s wife. Usman (r.a.) ordered four Companions who were among the scribes who wrote the Qur’an when the Prophet dictated it, led by Zaid bin Thabit (r.a.) to rewrite the script in several perfect copies. These were sent by Usman (r.a.) to the main centres of Muslims.

There were other personal collections of the portions of the Qur’an that people had with them. These might have been incomplete and with mistakes. Usman (r.a.) only appealed to the people to destroy all these copies which did not match the original manuscript of the Qur’an in order to preserve the original text of the Qur’an. Two such copies of the copied text of the original Qur’an authenticated by the Prophet are present to this day, one at the museum in Tashkent in erstwhile Soviet Union and the other at the Topkapi Museum in Istanbul, Turkey.


5. Diacritical marks were added for non-Arabs

The original manuscript of the Qur’an does not have the signs indicating the vowels in Arabic script. These vowels are known as tashkil, zabar, zair, paish in Urdu and as fatah, damma and qasra in Arabic. The Arabs did not require the vowel signs and diacritical marks for correct pronunciation of the Qur’an since it was their mother tongue. For Muslims of non-Arab origin, however, it was difficult to recite the Qur’an correctly without the vowels. These marks were introduced into the Quranic script during the time of the fifth ‘Umayyad’ Caliph, Malik-ar-Marwan (66-86 Hijri/685-705 C.E.) and during the governorship of Al-Hajaj in Iraq.

Some people argue that the present copy of the Qur’an that we have along with the vowels and the diacritical marks is not the same original Qur’an that was present at the Prophet’s time. But they fail to realize that the word ‘Qur’an’ means a recitation. Therefore, the preservation of the recitation of the Qur’an is important, irrespective of whether the script is different or whether it contains vowels. If the pronunciation and the Arabic is the same, naturally, the meaning remains the same too.


6. Allah Himself has promised to guard the Qur’an

Allah has promised in the Qur’an :

"We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption). [Al-Qur’an 15:9]


Source :
http://www.islam101.com/quran/preservedQ.htm
 

Abu Sarah

Allahu Akbar
Staff member
Hi,

By our Brother / Andalusian

i think the pic be clear..Now..

read and come u wellcome..

we waiting ur reply..

All time u put Questions..and not reply..why ?

peace,
 

Submitter

Junior Member
:salam2:

I highly recommend a talk by Dr Zakir Naik on this subject:

Al-Quran: Should it be read with Understanding?

You may be able to find the whole talk somewhere on the Internet, as many of his talks are available for free, scattered around different websites such as Google Video and You Tube.

Hope this is helpful, inshallah (God willing)

:wasalam:
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Salaam,

I am not a scholar. I am a Muslim. When I read the Holy and Noble and Glorious Quran..I take it literally.

As Muslims we do not have room for literary criticism. We know it to be exact. There is no room for interpertation.
As a previous response stated " It is one." There are no doubts. If there were we would not call ourselves Muslims.

Bear in mind the Holy and Noble and Glorious Quran was never hidden from the common man. Islam encourages all Muslims to read and memorize the Quran.

The Bible was hidden from the common man until the King James edition ( 1650 ish). The Catholic Bible is very different from the KJV's.
The text of the NRV's is not the same as the Jerusalem Bible nor the KJV.

The Bible was taken literally until the 1970's. Post Vatican II era questioned all of Christian belief's. Think of the number of priests who were banned in the Vatican ( not allowed to write ). How can the Bible be taken literally when it is written that homosexality is a sin but there are gay bishops?



I pray Allah forgive me if I written wrong.
 

unalsnake

Junior Member
the first Quran saves in Topkapı Palace in turkey(istanbul) Also in there many many holy objects Like Muhammad(s.a.v.) swords Abu Bakeer(r.a) swords Omar(r.a.) swords Osman(r.a) swords and Ali(r.a.) swords and 4 5 footprints of Muhammad(s.a.w.) one of them from Mirac Miracle and Muhammed(s.a.v)'s objects and beard(Sakal-i Serif) Salamun Alaikum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top