Jaipur Literature Festival: Cancellation of Rushdie's India visit a victory of democr

Ershad

Junior Member
:salam2:

Jaipur Literature Festival: Cancellation of Rushdie's India visit a victory of democracy, says Darul Uloom Deoband


MUZAFFARNAGAR: Leading Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deoband on FRiday dubbed controversial author Salman Rushdie's cancellation of his visit to India as a "victory of democracy".

"It is a victory of democracy because some Muslim organisations, including Darul Uloom Deoband, had opposed the visit to India in a democratic way," Vice-Chancellor of Darul Uloom Deoband, Maulana Abul Qasim Nomani told reporters.

The Islamic seminary had on January 9 asked the government to stop Rushdie's visa as he had allegedly hurt religious sentiments of Muslims.

65-year-old Rushdie, who had earned the wrath of Muslims worldwide due to his novel 'The Satanic Verses', was set to attend the Jaipur Literature Festival.

Rushdie calls off India visit

Rushdie on Friday cancelled his visit to India for the Jaipur Literature Festival citing threats to his life, ending days of speculation over his participation in the event.

In a statement read out to the press by festival producer Sanjoy K Roy, the Booker Prize winning author stated that he had been told by intelligence sources in Maharashtra and Rajasthan that "paid assassins" from the Mumbai underworld may be on their way to Jaipur to "eliminate" him.

"While I have some doubts about the accuracy of this intelligence, it would be irresponsible of me to come to the Festival in such circumstances; irresponsible to my family, to the festival audience, and to my fellow writers. I will, therefore, not travel to Jaipur as planned," he said as the five-day literary meet kicked off today.

The 65-year-old novelist later said on Twitter that he would participate at the event via video link.

While the festival organisers said such incidents were essentially unacceptable, the organisations protesting the visit said freedom of expression does not give anyone right to write anything objectionable.

Reacting to the announcement, festival director Namita Gokhale said she was "deeply disappointed" even so when the author had been a part of this gathering in 2007.

Co-director William Dalrymple said Rushdie's case has been that of "Chinese whispers" as most people have not read what he has written.

"Salman is a writer of enormous breath and writes on huge variety of subjects. His passionate engagement with Indian Islamic history shows he is as far as can possibly be removed from Islamophobia.

"He is one of India's greatest writers and in a more just world his arrival here would have been welcomed by people showering rose petals on the road," he said.

Rushdie's proposed visit was objected to by India's largest Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deoband besides raising the hackles of several right wing groups.

Rushdie said in his statement that he had refrained from commenting on the subject for several days at the request of local authorities "hoping that they would put in place such precautions as might be necessary to allow me to come and address the Festival audience in circumstances that were comfortable and safe for all".

The author has earlier attended the Jaipur Literature Festival in 2007, without much fuss. However, the exponential growth the festival has witnessed since then has made sure the developments here catch more eyeballs now than earlier.

Rushdie, who had kept silent on Twitter all these days, reappeared on the social networking site to make his disappointment at the events plain.

"Very sad not to be at Jaipur. I was told Bombay mafia don issued weapons to 2 hitmen to "eliminate" me. Will do video link instead. Damn (sic)," he wrote.

After reading out the statement by the 'Midnight's Children' author, and terming the development very unfortunate, Roy refused to take any more questions, saying these should now be directed to the state government.

"It shows a shocking lack of vision and integrity... Easily what many people do is ban or burn or stop, which in a country that boasts of diversity of opinion, is ridiculous and unacceptable....And this is not only about this case, today it is an A group of organisations, tomorrow it will be another," said an agitated Roy.

The announcement also came on a day when a group of Muslim organisations, who had met the festival organisers yesterday, had said they would hold a peaceful protest at the Jama Masjid to make their objection clear to the invitation extended to the author, whose 'Satanic Verses' had triggered controversy in the Islamic world, earning him the fatwa.

Welcoming the announcement of the cancellation of the visit, Mohammad Salim, national secretary of Jamat-e-Islami Hind, said It was a good development and Rushdie was a "criminal from our religious point of view."

"... Some political groups were also in favour of protest so that they can misuse our platform that is why we were repeatedly asking the organisers and the government to cancel his visit because we did not want any untoward happening in the name of our protest," he said.

The festival will see over 200 authors flood the Diggi Palace venue. Among the big names on the festival list this year are Tom Stoppard, Michael Ondaatje and Ben Okri.


Source:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...-Darul-Uloom-Deoband/articleshow/11568367.cms
 

kashif_nazeer

~~~Alhamdulillah~~~
:wasalam:

That garbage of a book is being given way too much importance.
What needs to be done is refutation regarding what the book presents be made and published and distributed and this person who wrote it and all who support him and think like him, be humiliated.
 

Ershad

Junior Member
:salam2:

I don't even know how to react to people's reaction to such literary work. Mind you, after "Satanic Verses", books of similar kind are on the rise. Authors like him are growing - Irshad Manji, Robert Spencer, Ayan Hirsi Ali etc. Their argument: Like everything (movies, books, people, technology), religion also can be criticized and analyzed. In my opinion, the majority of the current generation is moving towards ''Open" & "free" society, free market, free culture. In this kind of situation, it becomes a person's choice to be responsible towards his fellow mankind. He either can be responsible or choose to be selfish. When humanity is given a choice, it always chooses the path Shaytan has beautified for them.

I am appalled.
 

kashif_nazeer

~~~Alhamdulillah~~~
:wasalam:

Allah has promised that such people will never be successful brother and not a least bit of harm can they do to Allah.

They want to extinguish the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah refuses except to perfect His light, although the disbelievers dislike it.[9:32]

These people are not the first ad they would certainly not be the last.
What I think in my opinion,we can do is present the correct image of Islam and the knowledgeable ones amongst us can write and publish refutations against them.
Take this for example a response to Pastor Terry Jones by iERA
[yt]KQC4bu3qd2w&feature=relmfu[/yt]

I don't know but many of them have debated and been bitterly humiliated.Shut their faces once and for all through knowledge.
Apart from that we should also strive to seek knowledge so if someone asks us we can answer them in the best of ways.
Plus whilst all of this we have to be patient ,because we know a lot of hate will come along our way.
 

ShahnazZ

Striving2BeAStranger
^MashAllah, I love my brothers and sisters in the UK. May Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala give all of us the strength to do dawah in such a beautiful manner.
 

strive-may-i

Junior Member
Not worthy of news...

A painter was sent out, a writer was not let in... sounds fine, because, the hatred these trigger is :astag:
 
Top