:salam2:
I wonder, which muslim would disagree on that point. All muslims claim to be on tawheed, of course with different understandings of the same. We should keep on resolving our differences remaining within the bounds of ettiquetts (which are unfortunately hard to find among those, who are following the purest form of Tawheed). We should never forget that those who have gone astray are also our brothers and sisters.
Having said that, I think it is not only Tawheed but the whole haqiqatulimaan, and wisdome of deen, which is missing in our understanding. While writing that, I have the example of Isa (AS) and the jewish scholars of his time in my mind. As far as I understand, they were not doing shirk but they were lacking "hikmah" (which was the main topic of injeel), behind the "kitaab", (which was the main topic of taurah). My feeling is, that we need to concentrate on hikmah of our deen in parallel to kitaab (the laws). The true understanding of Tawheed is, no doubt, on top of that hikmah.
I didn't know you were so hate-filled against "him". I also don't consider him a scholar, nor I take my understanding of deen from him but I recognize his right to have a knowledged difference of opinion with Albani. Who gives you the right to judge over a muslim brother, who is giving his time, money and energies to serve Islam in a way he thinks is appropriate for him. How could you read his intentions, that he is doing that to appease the kuffaar? To have good thoughts (hasan-u-dzann) about your muslim brothers and sisters belongs to the basic qualities of the believers, which you should also strive to acquire.
I wonder, which muslim would disagree on that point. All muslims claim to be on tawheed, of course with different understandings of the same. We should keep on resolving our differences remaining within the bounds of ettiquetts (which are unfortunately hard to find among those, who are following the purest form of Tawheed). We should never forget that those who have gone astray are also our brothers and sisters.
Having said that, I think it is not only Tawheed but the whole haqiqatulimaan, and wisdome of deen, which is missing in our understanding. While writing that, I have the example of Isa (AS) and the jewish scholars of his time in my mind. As far as I understand, they were not doing shirk but they were lacking "hikmah" (which was the main topic of injeel), behind the "kitaab", (which was the main topic of taurah). My feeling is, that we need to concentrate on hikmah of our deen in parallel to kitaab (the laws). The true understanding of Tawheed is, no doubt, on top of that hikmah.
I didn't know you were so hate-filled against "him". I also don't consider him a scholar, nor I take my understanding of deen from him but I recognize his right to have a knowledged difference of opinion with Albani. Who gives you the right to judge over a muslim brother, who is giving his time, money and energies to serve Islam in a way he thinks is appropriate for him. How could you read his intentions, that he is doing that to appease the kuffaar? To have good thoughts (hasan-u-dzann) about your muslim brothers and sisters belongs to the basic qualities of the believers, which you should also strive to acquire.
