TOOOOO FUNNY.

:salam2: My niece is in the second grade . My sister went for a school meeting to her school. And she met her class teacher who is a yahudi. So this teacher and my sister is having a conversation.The teacher started talking about religion. And my sister trying to be polite said we all r brothers and sisters ( yahudi and muslims) since we come from the lineage of Ibraheem A.S. You will find it very funny what the teacher had to say after that. She said yes but i think the muslims are angry cause they come from the lineage of hajjar who was a servent and the yahudi comes from sarah the actual wife in the eyes of God. My sister was soo much in a state of shock that she did not know what to say..
 

Mohsin

abdu'Allah
:salam2: Brother

I find Jews and interestingly Christians as well obsessed with this Sarah and Hajar and Isaac and Ishmael debate. Lets see how much of it is true. This is a response by a revert brother I found on some website a while ago.
The first argument is that after the birth of Isaac, Ishmael lost his status of being a son of Abraham, since he was not born of a wife of Abraham but born to a handmaid of Abraham's wife. However, this argument is false because Hagar was a wife of Abraham otherwise the Lord would not have used the word wife in the following verse.

Genesis 16:3 So after Abraham had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife.

Moreover, Jews and Christians contend that only Isaac, the one that was born to Sarai was a son. However the biblical passage below tells us that Ishmael never lost his status as a son, not even after the birth of Isaac. If Ishmael had lost the status, the Lord would not have used the word sons in the following verse.

Genesis 25:9 Then his sons Isaac and Ishmael, buried him (Abraham) in the cave of Machpelah.

[FONT=Times New (W1)]A second argument[FONT=Times New (W1)] presented is that because Ishmael was born to a handmaid he would qualify as a seed or a descendant of Abraham, but not as a son. This argument is nullified because prevailing Nuzi Laws of marriage (exhibit A) tell us that such marriage contracts were legal in the days of Abraham and the child born of a handmaid or slave-girl would have the same status as one born to the wife, even if the wife had a child of her own later.[/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New (W1)]There can be no doubt concerning the validity of the Nuzi laws of marriage. For example, when one traces the maternal side of the children of Israel, Genesis tells us that Jacob (later called Israel Gen 32:28) had four wives. He married Leah (Gen 29:22-23), Rachel (Gen 29:28), a slave-girl Bilhah (Gen 30:4), and another slave-girl Zilpah (Gen 30:9). From these four wives came the twelve Children of Israel: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph, Benjamin, Dan, Naptali, Gad and Asher (Gen 35:23-26 & 1 Chronicles 2:1-2). [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New (W1)]All twelve of these children make up the Israelites and are all referred as a combined group, see (Exodus 1:1-9).Four of the twelve children (Gad, Dan, Naphtali and Asher) were sons of the slave-girls. Thus, it follows that about one third of all Israelis are children of slave-girls! Will a third of all Jews stand up and say they are illegitimate?[/FONT]
P.S. Next time your sister meet the teacher please ask her which tribe of Israel does she belong to ?
 
Top