What Our Scholars Said About Debate

saima abdullah

my life iz 4 Allah
What Our Scholars Said About Debate
Shaykh Saleh Abdullah bin Humaid

Excerpted from "Islamic Principles and Rules of Debate"
© Al-Manara 1994





“A debate is only justified to unveil truth, so that the more knowledgeable should impart knowledge to the less knowledgeable, and to stimulate a weaker intellect.” - adh-Dhahabi

“I never talked with someone but sincerely wished that Allah guard him, protect him from sin and misdeed, and guide him; and I never debated with someone but sincerely wished that we would come upon truth, regardless of whether he or I should be the one to think of it first.” - Imam al-Shafi`i

“Cooperation in seeking truth is inherent to religion, but sincerity in the pursuit of truth can be distinguished y certain conditions and signs. A diligent seeker of truth may be compared to one who is looking for his lost camel. It would be immaterial for him if he or another person should be the one to find it. Likewise, a sincere truth-seeker would perceive his partner as a helper rather than an adversary, and would be grateful to him if he should guide him to truth.” - Al-Ghazali

“If quoting, maintain accuracy; if claiming, provide proof.” [An aphorism of Muslim scholars]

“Some scholars used to excuse anyone who disagrees with them in debatable matters, and did not insist that he should accept their view. - Ibn Qudama [Al-Mughni]

“My viewpoint is right, but can be wrong; and my adversary’s viewpoint is wrong, but can be right.” [An aphorism of Muslim scholars]

“I have never debated with a knowledgeable person but beaten him, and I have never debated with an ignorant person but been beaten by him.” - Imam al-Shafi`i

“Let each one of the debaters accept statements of the other party supported with proof. By doing that, he would demonstrate a nobility and self-respect, and he would prove himself to be an acceptor of truth.” - Ibn Akeel

“Over-enthusiasm is a mark of corrupted scholars, even when the case they are defending is true. By showing excessive enthusiasm for truth and their contempt of their opponents, the latter would be stimulated to retaliate and react in the same manner. They would be driven to stand for falsehood and to be true to the label attributed to them…If the champions of truth had spoken kindly to them avoiding publicity and humiliation they would have succeeded in winning them over. But as it is, a person who enjoys a place of prestige is strongly inclined to preserve his position by attracting followers, and the only way to that is to boast and to attack or curse adversaries.” - Al-Ghazali

“I never debate with someone and he accepts my proof except that I hold him in high esteem, and I never debate with someone and he refuses my proof except that I lose all esteem for him.” - Imam al-Shafi`i

“If you sit with scholars, my son, be more interested in listening than in speaking. Learn good listening just as you learn good speaking. Never interrupt a speaker, even if he takes long, until he comes to an end.” -Advice of Al-Hasan ibn Ali (radhiallahu `anhu) to his son.

“Learn good listening just as you learn good speaking. To be a good listener, you should give a speaker time until he concludes, not seeming anxious to reply. Have your face and look in the direction of the speaker and try to understand what he says.” - Ibn al-Muqaffa`
 

saima abdullah

my life iz 4 Allah
jasak Allah sister but i would just add onething
dont debate to nurish your ego others can be right as well ....i mean in inter-muslim debate,,, coz hard headed debates spread hate in muslims
 

icadams

Junior Member
Jazak-Allahu khayran, a wonderful post brother. Too often I have found Muslims who allow honest debates to descend into angry arguments with no consideration from either party. Good debate encourages our faith and helps to increase our knowledge.
 

saima abdullah

my life iz 4 Allah
Saima: I am not a Muslim. I just enjoy debate to make myself smarter. Most of the time I argue against Islam, although on occasion I also defend it, such as when someone attempted to attack Islam by attacking Mohammed. That is a logical fallacy known as an 'ad hominem' or 'Straw Man' argument. Or attempting to attack an idea by attacking some irrelevent character flaw of the originator of the idea.

I know an ad hominem argument when I see one, and it annoys me.
hi
i pray for u may Allah open your heart for Islam.. n i appreciate that you defend Islam ...i suggest you study Quran and think upon it .....
i basically believe to find the truth you have to rebel a bit form the pre-defined and established things because when you think i am perfect or m on the perfect path... you blind yourself from many other things that might be truth .... it put a curtain before your eyes .... curtain of pride n prejudice... these things stops one from accept,,, as Quran refers many a times the response of pagans of Makkah.... that we will follow the religion which our for fathers followed ... they don't had evidence of their following (accept few weak reasons).... they didn't rebel from their pre-established religion n ideas so they were disable to truth before them...
n those who submitted they mark their names in history and left a great numbers of followers ....
 

saima abdullah

my life iz 4 Allah
Jazak-Allahu khayran, a wonderful post brother. Too often I have found Muslims who allow honest debates to descend into angry arguments with no consideration from either party. Good debate encourages our faith and helps to increase our knowledge.
i m agree with you brother
 
Top