arzafar
Junior Member
i have read some articles which put taqleed and ijtihad against each other and portray them as opposites.
my question is why do they have to be opposites. they can complement each other. In issues that have clear commands, there is taqleed and in contemporary or specific issues there can be ijtihad.
so why leave one for the other?
my question is why do they have to be opposites. they can complement each other. In issues that have clear commands, there is taqleed and in contemporary or specific issues there can be ijtihad.
so why leave one for the other?