I have been reading Karen Armstrong's Book "A History Of God" and have come across the following terms: Mutazilis, Asharites and Kalam and how they apparently took Islam in distinct different ideas, much the way Christians have split off in Chrisitanity. To the extent it seems that they somewhat "changed" the originial context of things. Is there any one here that can explain this further for me?
assalamo alaikum sister..
well in short..
Kalam is a form of religious sciences..this science seeks religious principles through dialectics..thus it's called the "Elmo El-Kalam"..the word "kalam" literally means "talk" in Arabic
the Mu'tizilis and the Asharites...are schools within the Kalam movement
the Mu'tizilis believe in using ration and reason in defining..describing..and practicing religion..their doctorine focuses on 5 principles in religion (which I personally find weird..as it makes you wonder why it's just 5 principles..or why it's these 5 in specific?)..
the Asharites believe the opposite..they believe that humans are too weak to be capable of deciphering the wisdom of religion or specifically to comprehend the divinity of God..and that human beings can't create..choose..or do anything even with their God-given free-will..as it is limited..
I read about them when I was doing a research for a paper about sects in Islam..what I read made me suspicious of their schools of thought..I honestly get an uneasy feeling about anything does not sound befitting of the authentic sunnah and the Qura'an so that along with what I read got me to that concluding feeling
..also..when reading about the history of these schools you'll find that they had much political influence fed into them..so you should be careful about things like that..
nonetheless..it's good that you are asking questions about what you read..that way you can avoid being misinformed and clarify any confusions you might have..that is very good for you sister
wa alaikum assalam wa rahmatu allah