California Mosque Protest: Protesters Call for No More Mosques in America

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)

www.realcourage.org/2010/07/temecula-mosque-protest/

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) supports our universal human rights of freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, and freedom of worship for ALL people -- without exception. We reject protests against houses of worship.

On July 30, 2010, in Temecula, California a group protested outside the current facilities being used by the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley, while the Islamic Center is planning to build a mosque in Temecula, where it purchased land in 2005. As previously reported, the facility is a business warehouse where area Muslims go to worship. According to KABC news, "The existing Islamic center has been operating in Temecula out of an industrial building for almost 10 years."


The Islamic Center of Temecula has held worship services in an industrial building for nearly 10 years (Photo: Irfan Khan, Los Angeles Times)Those opposed to the planned mosque went outside the existing Islamic Center facilities during the Friday worship services to protest "no more mosques in America."

The protesters with loudspeakers and signs, denounced the right of the Islamic Center or any Muslims to their freedom of religion to hold worship services in mosques, with signs such as "No More Mosques in America," "Mosques are Monuments to Terrorism," "No Rights for Mosques," and "Stop Taqiyya - Lies to Non Muslims to protect and spread Islam."


The Southwest Riverside News Network (SWRN) reported that there were about 35 anti-mosque protesters. SWRN reported that "Using a bullhorn, the protesters shouted anti-Islamic slogans as Muslim families came to worship Friday afternoon. 'Go back home' and 'We don't want you here,' the protesters said."


Temecula, California Anti-Mosque Protest According to the Valley News, "many of the mosque foes equated Muslims to 'terrorists'," and that "Ernie White, who described himself as a possible candidate for Temecula City Council in November, was among the most outspoken critics of the mosque plan." Ernie White is an activist with a California Tea Party group in the Riverside, California area.


The Temecula anti-mosque protest was publicized online by the national Tea Party Patriots web site, by a group called the Southwest Riverside County (SWRC) Tea Party Citizens in Action group. The event was publicized by a Tea Party activist, Diana Serafin. R.E.A.L. was told by news media sources in California that while Diana Serafin had posted the promotion of the event, she was not actively organizing it. But the Press-Enterprise news media interviewed Tea Party activist Diana Serafin at the Temecula anti-mosque protest on July 30, 2010.


The Southwest Riverside County (SWRC) Tea Party Citizens in Action group had planned to "pack the house" to reject the Temecula mosque at a government hearing scheduled for August 18, but Temecula officials have postponed the hearing to November.

On Diana Serafin's posting at the national Tea Party Patriots web site, she described the anti-mosque protest as "Silent Majority Silent No More! We will not be Submissive! An Islamic Mosque is planned to be built in Temecula. We are holding a Singing - Praying - Patriotic rally on Friday on the side of the road on Rio Nedo in Temecula. Bring your Bibles, flags, signs, dogs and singing voice on Friday to let everyone know we are a Christian community and will not tolerate Sharia law and radical behavior."

On July 29, 2010, R.E.A.L. reported in an interview with California Tea Party activist Shellie Milne that she believed that some California Tea Party activists rejected the mosque protest. R.E.A.L. has publicized an online petition for Tea Party activists to sign to publicly support freedom of religion and disassociate themselves with protests against houses of worship. To date, it has just one signature by one Tea Party activist - Shellie Milne.

The Valley News reported that "The anti-mosque rally was largely publicized via a July 18 electronic newsletter that was distributed to newspapers and local conservative political activists. The rally notice was listed among opinion pieces and upcoming activities planned by Republican and Tea Party activists."

Another one of the protesters, Zorina Bennett of Temecula, was one of the mosque protesters, who told the Los Angeles Times that Muslims "are known terrorists." Zorina Bennett brought her dog Meadow to the protest in the belief that many Muslims view the saliva of dogs as impure, when going to pray. According to the Valley News, Zorina Bennett "carried a sign fashioned in the shape of a cross. 'This is America. This is a Christian country, not a Muslim country.'"

Other anti-mosque protesters speaking to the press included: Mano Bakh of Wildomar with a sign "No More Mosques in America, according to SWRN's report;" Cynthia Daum (Cynthia Don?) with a sign "No Allah's Law Here" who told KPCC "I do no want them here just like I do not want the illegal Hispanic people here, I don’t want 'em."

According to the Los Angeles Times, "One of the most heated moments came around 12:20 p.m. when Fred Carlson, a heavy equipment operator from Temecula, drove his pickup truck past the Islamic Center twice, calling Muslims 'pedophiles' and hurling a few curse words."

KPCC Southern Public Radio Network news reported that local Calvary Baptist Church pastor Bill Rench had sent out an open letter to parishioners stating that "We certainly find ample cause to oppose the spread of Islam."

According to the Valley News, "The protesters were outnumbered by mosque supporters – some from as far away as Los Angeles and San Diego – who carried signs and gave speeches of their own. Many of them sat under a shade awning in front of the Islamic Center and wore lapel tags with the word 'Friend' printed upon them."


http://beforeitsnews.com/story/135/...ters_Call_for_No_More_Mosques_in_America.html
 

Valerie

Junior Member
I'm trying to not say bad things about people right now, but these "protesters" are really pushing me.

Two things scare me. First:

Bring your Bibles, flags, signs, dogs and singing voice on Friday to let everyone know we are a Christian community and will not tolerate Sharia law and radical behavior.

WHAT? Radical behavior? Want to talk about radical behavior? How about using your constitutional right to try and deny someone else theirs. One word: Hypocrites. That's not mean, it's just the truth about them.

Second:

The rally notice was listed among opinion pieces and upcoming activities planned by Republican and Tea Party activists.


Oh really? I'm not registered as a Republican or Democrat, but that's making me reconsider going Democrat. Shocking that half of the country's politicians would even consider such hateful behavior.

Sad part is, I'm really not that surprised.
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

Well the Zionists have done a good job. They have managed to make the average joe become a bully. The average joe who does not even take the time to understand his country is using his money to carry Israel. The average Joe is so stupid he does not even care that his house is being foreclosed to support the zionists. Americans are losing jobs but the Israeli's have swimming pools.


Maybe it is time for the Muslims to do some PR work. And expose the truth.
 

soulzcore

Abd-Allah !!
:salam2:

About two weeks ago I was in a mosque in Charlotte when about 30 or so Christian activists gathered at the gate and started giving Anti-Islamic speeches which changed into abuses.. After the prayer there was an announcement in the mosque saying "Please leave quietly after your prayer and dont try to tackle the people outside coz they are looking for trouble". But is that what we are supposed to do when we have people abusing our Prophet(S.A.W.S) right in our faces...???

Anywayz 5 of us walked to the gate but the cops were already there and they moved them on the road outside the masjid's boundary. The only thing we did was we chanted Takbir until the mosque was empty..

When I was getting out I called the guy who was distributing flyers. As soon as he came to my window he was like "You gonna go to Hell and so on and on..." I stopped him and said " Allah Hu Akbar Brother, Do you know what Islam means..?". I dunno why I said this, but He was like "C you are trying to kill me, This is what you say before you blow up school buses and kill people.."
Damn, He thinks Allah Hu Akbar = I want to kill you :)

I said "This is why I say you are ignorant, I said God is great and never said I'm gonna Kill you...". At this point a cop appeared and asked me to leave..

It is actually funny and ironic when people say they know a lot about Islam without knowing what Allah Hu Akbar means...

This was the first time I was actually out of NY/NJ and I was shocked to encounter this.. I spoke to the IMAM and he said its pretty common, they come here every month..:astag:
 

arzafar

Junior Member
:salam2:

About two weeks ago I was in a mosque in Charlotte when about 30 or so Christian activists gathered at the gate and started giving Anti-Islamic speeches which changed into abuses.. After the prayer there was an announcement in the mosque saying "Please leave quietly after your prayer and dont try to tackle the people outside coz they are looking for trouble". But is that what we are supposed to do when we have people abusing our Prophet(S.A.W.S) right in our faces...???

Anywayz 5 of us walked to the gate but the cops were already there and they moved them on the road outside the masjid's boundary. The only thing we did was we chanted Takbir until the mosque was empty..

When I was getting out I called the guy who was distributing flyers. As soon as he came to my window he was like "You gonna go to Hell and so on and on..." I stopped him and said " Allah Hu Akbar Brother, Do you know what Islam means..?". I dunno why I said this, but He was like "C you are trying to kill me, This is what you say before you blow up school buses and kill people.."
Damn, He thinks Allah Hu Akbar = I want to kill you :)

I said "This is why I say you are ignorant, I said God is great and never said I'm gonna Kill you...". At this point a cop appeared and asked me to leave..

It is actually funny and ironic when people say they know a lot about Islam without knowing what Allah Hu Akbar means...

This was the first time I was actually out of NY/NJ and I was shocked to encounter this.. I spoke to the IMAM and he said its pretty common, they come here every month..:astag:

how about inviting them inside the mosque and serving those 30 odd some lunch (and yes every month)? perhaps it would soften their hearts. it's definitely worth a try.
tbh i think Christians generally have a soft heart; they just need a does of truth.
 

queenislam

★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
Amazingly surprised!!!

:bismillah:
:salam2:

A very surprising reaction from the Christians as being too sensitive 2wards our family in Islam the religion of peace in America just to built a humble mosque!

But one will wonder what about The Christians contribute to their counter part land as Christians called their holy Land back home in Jerusalem(Baitulmukadis)Palestine!

The Holy Land's Christian decline - 12 May 09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjjiuwtt-SY

Like no word and No Comment about this what so ever so so no care!!!

Wow...Amazingly surprised!!!
I'm startled!

Thank you for sharing this posting sister.
~May Allah swt reward you~Amin!

Ramadhan Al Mubarak!

Thank you,
Take Care!

~Wassalam.
 

soulzcore

Abd-Allah !!
how about inviting them inside the mosque and serving those 30 odd some lunch (and yes every month)? perhaps it would soften their hearts. it's definitely worth a try.
tbh i think Christians generally have a soft heart; they just need a does of truth.

:salam2:

How about giving them a copy of the qur'an and inviting them to Iftar...?

I too had the same view's brother.But after being in the situation myself the one thing I could say is, forget inviting them to lunch, its actually very very nice of them if they even listen to what you speak...

And whatever reason they were there for, I am sure they had no intention of learning anything...
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

In the south there is racism and zenophobia. That is a powerful combination. If you go to the Triangle it is a little better...there are more minorities there. Black communities tolerate diversity much better.

It makes me want to hand out Qurans outside churches on Sundays. I want to go to a church service and when it is time for the offering I want to put a Quran in the tray.

What I love about capitalism is this: when the Muslims put down enough money for a down payment..we can have a masjid. It's all about the money.
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

This is good:

GORDON DUFF: THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE LIES
ISRAEL’S PRE-ELECTION ATTEMPT TO DEFLECT A NEW 9/11 INVESTIGATION
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

There never were plans for a mosque at “ground zero.” The entire story is made up by a public relations agency working with the Israeli government and the GOP. There are plans for an Islamic center in an old Burlington Coat Factory store blocks away. That far down the island of Manhattan, a couple blocks away is “across town.” The idea that Israel is financing the “Ground Zero Mosque” controversy when Mossad agents were arrested, dancing in the streets on 9/11, is an obscenity.

Let’s get some facts straight. Since 2001 alot has happened, none of it reported widely in the press. It has been categorically proven that the supposed hijackers could never have flown any of the planes on 9/11. Start with a reality check. This is why “9/11″ as people are still being misinformed simply never happened:

Nila Sagadevan is an aeronautical engineer and a pilot. There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although proven to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172, had acquired the impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight simulators. What follows is an attempt to bury this myth once and for all, because I’ve heard this ludicrous explanation bandied about, ad nauseam, on the Internet and the TV networks—invariably by people who know nothing substantive about flight simulators, flying, or even airplanes.

A common misconception non-pilots have about simulators is how “easy” it is to operate them. They are indeed relatively easy to operate if the objective is to make a few lazy turns and frolic about in the “open sky”. But if the intent is to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the task immediately becomes quite daunting. And if the aim is to navigate to a specific geographic location hundreds of miles away while flying at over 500 MPH, 30,000 feet above the ground the challenges become virtually impossible for an untrained pilot.

And this, precisely, is what the four hijacker pilots who could not fly a Cessna around an airport by themselves are alleged to have accomplished in multi-ton, high-speed commercial jets on 9/11.

For a person not conversant with the practical complexities of pilotage, a modern flight simulator could present a terribly confusing and disorienting experience. These complex training devices are not even remotely similar to the video games one sees in amusement arcades, or even the software versions available for home computers.

In order to operate a modern flight simulator with any level of skill, one has to not only be a decent pilot to begin with, but also a skilled instrument-rated one to boot — and be thoroughly familiar with the actual aircraft type the simulator represents, since the cockpit layouts vary between aircraft.

The only flight domains where an arcade/PC-type game would even begin to approach the degree of visual realism of a modern professional flight simulator would be during the take-off and landing phases. During these phases, of course, one clearly sees the bright runway lights stretched out ahead, and even peripherally sees images of buildings, etc. moving past. Take-offs—even landings, to a certain degree—are relatively “easy”, because the pilot has visual reference cues that exist “outside” the cockpit.

But once you’ve rotated, climbed out, and reached cruising altitude in a simulator (or real airplane), and find yourself en route to some distant destination (using sophisticated electronic navigation techniques), the situation changes drastically: the pilot loses virtually all external visual reference cues, and is left entirely at the mercy of an array of complex flight and navigation instruments to provide situational cues (altitude, heading, speed, attitude, etc.)

In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of assorted “hard” instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation, position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well. When flying “blind”, I.e., with no ground reference cues, it takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret, and then apply, this data intelligently. If one cannot translate this information quickly, precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot to do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot wouldn’t have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. Flight under such conditions is referred to as “IFR”, or Instrument Flight Rules.

And IFR Rule #1: Never take your eyes off your instruments, because that’s all you have!

The corollary to Rule #1: If you can’t read the instruments in a quick, smooth, disciplined, scan, you’re as good as dead. Accident records from around the world are replete with reports of any number of good pilots — I.e., professional instrument-rated pilots — who ‘bought the farm’ because they ‘lost it’ while flying in IFR conditions.

Let me place this in the context of the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. These men were repeatedly deemed incompetent to solo a simple Cessna-172 — an elementary exercise that involves flying this little trainer once around the patch on a sunny day. A student’s first solo flight involves a simple circuit: take-off, followed by four gentle left turns ending with a landing back on the runway. This is as basic as flying can possibly get.

Not one of the hijackers was deemed fit to perform this most elementary exercise by himself.

When professional airline pilots, the majority trained by the United States Air Force, were asked to recreate the New York 9/11 attack in a flight simulator, two thirds failed entirely. None could duplicate the Pentagon attack at all. This is what the pilots had to say:

“Regarding your comments on flight simulators, several of my colleagues and I have tried to simulate the ‘hijacker’s’ final approach maneuvers into the towers on our company 767 simulator. We tried repeated tight, steeply banked 180 turns at 500 mph followed by a fast rollout and lineup with a tall building. More than two-thirds of those who attempted the maneuver failed to make a ‘hit’. How these rookies who couldn’t fly a trainer pulled this off is beyond comprehension.”

Then again, we might as well deal with the silliness of the Pentagon crash as well. Instead of dealing with conspiracy theory, lets try some aeronautical engineering instead. If you wonder why the internet conspiracy sites have talked about military planes crashing into the Pentagon, it is because they read the engineering reports, the ones the 9/11 Commission was not allowed to examine. You, however, are lucky. You can read the facts and make up your own mind:

Let it suffice to say that it is physically impossible to fly a 200,000-lb airliner 20 feet above the ground at 400 MPH.

The author, a pilot and aeronautical engineer, challenges any pilot in the world to do so in any large high-speed aircraft that has a relatively low wing-loading (such as a commercial jet). I.e., to fly the craft at 400 MPH, 20 feet above ground in a flat trajectory over a distance of one mile.

Why the stipulation of 20 feet and a mile? There were several street light poles located up to a mile away from the Pentagon that were snapped-off by the incoming aircraft; this suggests a low, flat trajectory during the final pre-impact approach phase. Further, it is known that the craft impacted the Pentagon’s ground floor. For purposes of reference: If a 757 were placed on the ground on its engine nacelles (I.e., gear retracted as in flight profile), its nose would be about fifteen feet above the ground. Ergo, for the aircraft to impact the ground floor of the Pentagon, Hanjour would have needed to have flown in with the engines buried in the Pentagon lawn. (Editor’s note: Grass on the lawn of the Pentagon was intact.)


At any rate, why is such ultra-low-level flight aerodynamically impossible? Because the reactive force of the hugely powerful downwash sheet, coupled with the compressibility effects of the tip vortices, simply will not allow the aircraft to get any lower to the ground than approximately one half the distance of its wingspan—until speed is drastically reduced, which, of course, is what happens during normal landings.
In other words, if this were a Boeing 757 as reported, the plane could not have been flown below about 60 feet above ground at 400 MPH. (Such a maneuver is entirely within the performance envelope of aircraft with high wing-loadings, such as ground-attack fighters, the B1-B bomber, and Cruise missiles—and the Global Hawk.)

Forgetting all the conspiracy theories, we can stick to the facts. The Pentagon is 77 feet 3.5 inches high. The lowest possible altitude a Boeing 757 aircraft can fly at, 400 mph, is 62 feet 5 inches, and that is with a top Air Force fighter jock at the controls. Had their been real simulations it is likely we would have been subjected to two possible scenarios:

1.The Boeing 757 would have struck the top half of the upper floor of the Pentagon and tumbled over the building while disintegrating. At 400 mph, some sections of fuselage would have landed as far as a half mile away.
2.The aircraft would have skipped across the top of the Pentagon like a stone on a pond, shedding its engines and would have left a debris field extending as much as a mile from the initial impact.
Simply put, Captain Charles Burlingame, Vietnam vet and fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions, a man who was known to be, not only fearless but tough as nails, would never have allowed a couple of idiots with box cutters to take over his cockpit, especially with First Officer David Charlebois to back him up.

The imaginary hijackers certainly didn’t fly these planes anywhere, it was technically impossible. Something else happened, we all saw it. If we can prove, and we have, that the “9/11 hijackers” were not flying the planes then who was?

With the anniversary of 9/11, 9 years of lies, coming up, the continual attempts to stop investigations called for by pilots, engineers, military and intelligence officers has been resisted.

Nobody has to prove how 9/11 was accomplished. We can only prove that it wasn’t done by Arab hijackers.

WHO IS REALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR 9/11?

With 9 years of history behind us, there are so many more possibilities. 9/11 made alot of things possible, looting the American economy, two wars, building a narcotics empire in South Asia and over 2 trillion dollars in missing Pentagon funds over 9 years. More money has been stolen because of 9/11 than from all the wars in history combined. Does this tell us who did it?

WHY THE MOSQUE ISSUE, WHY NOW?

If Wikileaks has proven one thing, it has shown that the internet has made it impossible to control information. What had been, at one time, a choice of “conspiracy” sites or “legitimate news sources” has now become less clear. Top journalists are now joining websites that aren’t afraid to ask hard questions and that don’t answer to corporate ownership and many of these sites have readership comparable to major news bureaus. Some have more influence and others have caused so much stir that the US government has sought power to shut down the internet at will.

9/11 is a story the government can’t kill.

Thus, the only protection from speculation about who is really responsible for 9/11, speculation that invariably leads to Israel and the Mossad, is a renewal of fear-mongering, racism and Islamophobia. Supporting these efforts is the Republican Party, slaughtered during the last election, now hoping to drum up a frenzy of fear and hate while soaking in hundreds of millions in contributions from Israel, the Wall Street “banksters” and “big Pharma.”

WATCHING IT PLAY OUT

Two phony stories are now competing for the ignorance and fear of Americans. The democrats are claiming that the GOP will bankrupt social security with their privatization schemes. Story after story fills the news. Senior citizens are voters and starvation is a good motivation for bringing people to the polls.

Republicans are still stuck with the Bush era “war on terror.” Their hopes are that millions of Americans will hide under their beds, frightened of suicide bombers and cartoon terrorists. Expect to see Islamophobia on nearly every TV series this fall. Also, expect, not only terror scares but maybe a very suspicious terror attack not long before the election. Would the GOP actually do that? Think about it. Remember Iraq? WMD’s? What do you think, especially with Israel behind them?

SCUMBAG CITY

If you want to make a list of Americans who should be put in quarantine, kept away from decent people, the Ground Zero Mosque ploy will be a great help. Start making a list. See what kind of manipulation you hear, see and read. See who is making all the noise. If you want to know how to tell who Americas biggest enemies are, they will all come out now, all will be screaming bloody murder over the “desecration of Ground Zero” by those evil Muslims.

While they are doing that, many more of us will be wondering what really happened on 9/11 now that we know for sure that what we were told was all a lie.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/08/14/gordon-duff-the-ground-zero-mosque-lies/
 

tabuzbr

Junior Member
Asalaamualaikum wa rahmathullah,ramadan Mubarak dear brothers and sisters in Islam .correct me if I am wrong dear sister but post 9/11 it was shown on tv that these hijackers had actually taken professional pilot training though I am sure still that didn't enlist flying a Boeing but somehow they made it all sound too plausible hence ensued the hatred towards Muslims and then Osama bin laden came into the picture and the vaguest implication of any Israeli involvement was practically erased,ya I sure hope things change now and some element of truth comes up soon amen and may Allah the almighty show us all the right path.
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

I will be brief. Never believe TV. TV stations used special effects to show the towers. I am not going to rewrite hundreds of my posts regarding 9/11.

There are many Americans who are angry with the government and its constant lying. They are the ones who are calling for truth. Engineers, physicists, doctors, professors, construction workersm, janitors and the list goes on and on are telling us this was all a lie.

Please read up on the dancing Israeli's. It is a good place to start your search for truth. Find out where the passengers for the mysterious flight to PA landed.

Why did BBC air the video of Building 7 17 minutes before it fell. What was happening on the 23rd floor?

Who was the actor that was first interviewed.

Oh let us not forget the inside trading on 9/10. Big Jewish bucks.

Iraq,Iran, Afganistan and Pakistan.

Affia Siddiqui, Omar Khadar, Dr. Sami Al-Arian etc. etc. etc.

Muslim blood for Zionist greed.

This is Ramadan and I can only speak the truth.
 

Tabassum07

Smile for Allah
I recently happened to come across a site that has tons and tons of documentaries and things that show that positively everything the government is telling us, not just about 9/11, but about so many other aspects in the news, including global warming, are all just a big lie.

Is it okay for me to post the website link here? It helped me realize how bad the world out there is, and made me learn that really, at this time, there's no one we can really trust except Allah SWT, and our own muslim brothers and sisters.

Edit: The website I was talking about which gives a lot of truth about all the government lies is www.brasschecktv.com
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

Sister,

I post the links I use. This ensures the reader the ability to see for themselves where I pulled my information.
 

joldas

Banned
:salam2:

bros. and sister.

oh, my Allah help them, help the Muslims.

place the imam he do not make the religion dirty in your mosque...

:tti_sister:

:tti_sister:
 

arzafar

Junior Member
Assalaam walaikum,

In the south there is racism and zenophobia. That is a powerful combination. If you go to the Triangle it is a little better...there are more minorities there. Black communities tolerate diversity much better.

It makes me want to hand out Qurans outside churches on Sundays. I want to go to a church service and when it is time for the offering I want to put a Quran in the tray.

What I love about capitalism is this: when the Muslims put down enough money for a down payment..we can have a masjid. It's all about the money.

alternatively if non muslims put done enough money we cannot have a masjid.
 

Aapa

Mirajmom
Assalaam walaikum,

No..it simply means whoever comes up with the right amount of money can have what they want. Anyone can be bought for any price.
 
Top