Christian Missionary

danyal.ahmed

Junior Member
Asalam-o-Alaikum

At Last i find the answer that was asked by a Christian Missionary that...Who Read the Nikah of Prophet Mohammad S.A.W with Bibi Khadijah R.A ?
the Answer is Hazrat Syed Abu Talib.....so remember this
 

massi

Junior Member
:salam2:
you can find it in any sira of our profete صلى الله عليه وسلم and we must learn more and more about his life and his Da3wa . :)
 

Bluegazer

Junior Member
Assalamu Alaikum Brandon,


Nikah is the Arabic pronunciation of the word "marriage". So, this has to do with the marriage of Prophet Muhammad [peace be upon him] with his first wife; Khadijah bint Khuwailid [may Allah be pleased with her].


Khadijah bint Khuwailid was the mother of six of the seven children of the Prophet [peace be upon him]. She died in Mecca some time before the Prophet [peace be upon him] emigrated to Madinah.


What I'm confused about is the question itself; "Who Read the Nikah of Prophet Mohammad S.A.W with Bibi Khadijah R.A ?"


My question to danyal.ahmed is:

What do you mean by the term "Read the Nikah" ??


Best regards,

Bluegazer

Wassalamu Alaikum
 

B.Yassine

New Member
Assalamu alaykum

If you want to know more about the Life of our prophet Mohammad S.A.W I invite you to visite enter this link:


P.S: The Sirah of our Prophet Mohammad is translated in ten languages.
Enjoy :)
 

NAVEED

Junior Member
Asalam-o-Alaikum

At Last i find the answer that was asked by a Christian Missionary that...Who Read the Nikah of Prophet Mohammad S.A.W with Bibi Khadijah R.A ?
the Answer is Hazrat Syed Abu Talib.....so remember this

I am more confused, I knew who Abu Talib was ( uncle of RasoolAllah) but who is 'HAZRAT SYED'Abu Talib, how can we name someone like that who was not a muslim, no offence to anybody, and no debate please but little inquiry please.

Assalamoalikum
 

Munawar

Striving for Paradise
I am more confused, I knew who Abu Talib was ( uncle of RasoolAllah) but who is 'HAZRAT SYED'Abu Talib, how can we name someone like that who was not a muslim, no offence to anybody, and no debate please but little inquiry please.

Assalamoalikum

:salam2:
I saw a discussion on TV, the people discussing were maulanas (religious clerics) and they were saying that when Abu Talib died, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and many other Sahabas gave him a Muslim funeral and burial. So in that discussion they said that if Prophet Muhammad put the casket of Abu Talib on his shoulder and lowerd him in his grave, then who are we to say that he was not a Muslim.

My take on this is that since I will not be asked on the Day of Judgement on this topic of Abu Talib, I just remain neutral on it. Neither I say that he was a Muslim nor I say he was not.
:wasalam:
 

Bluegazer

Junior Member
Assalamu Alaikum,


The following is the religious opinion [fatwa] of Shaykh Sulaymaan al-‘Alwaan. It was cited by islam-qa.com, which is supervised by Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid. It's an answer to question no. 13933 [Ruling on visiting a sick kaafir]. I coloured part of this fatwa in red:

Question:

It sometimes happens that one of the Christians with us at work or school gets sick. Is it permissible to visit him, and what is the ruling on visiting a sick kaafir?


Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

It is permissible to visit him with the intention of calling him to Islam and telling about Islam.

This is the moderate approach to the matter, because it is not right to disallow that altogether, as there is no evidence to that effect. In fact, that goes against the saheeh evidence.

Saying that it is permissible in absolute terms is subject to further discussion. The only option is to say that it is permissible to visit him in order to tell him about Islam or if there is the hope that he will embrace Islam.

It was narrated in Saheeh al-Bukhaari via Hammaad ibn Zayd from Thaabit from Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him), who said, “There was a Jewish boy who used to serve the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). He fell sick, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came to visit him. He sat at his head and said to him, ‘Embrace Islam.’ (The boy) looked towards his father, who was with him. (His father) said, ‘Obey Abu’l-Qaasim (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).’ So he embraced Islam, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) went out saying, ‘Praise be to Allaah Who has saved him from the Fire.’”

We learn a number of things from this hadeeth:

1. The good attitude of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

2. His eagerness to guide people.

3. That if a Jew dies following Judaism he is a kaafir who will abide forever in Hell. There is no dispute on this point from any of the scholars. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “By the One in Whose hand is my soul, no one of this nation, Jew or Christian, hears of me then dies not believing in that with which I have been sent, but he will be one of the people of Hell.” (Narrated by Muslim in his Saheeh from the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah).

4. It is OK to visit a Jew if there is the hope of achieving some interest thereby. Abu Dawood (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “I heard Imaam Ahmad being asked about visiting a Jew or a Christian (if he fell sick). He said, if he wants to call him to Islam, then yes (he should do that).

It was narrated in al-Saheehayn and elsewhere via Ibn Shihaab who said: Sa’eed ibn al-Musayyib told me that his father told him, when Abu Taalib was on his deathbed, the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came to him and found Abu Jahl ibn Hishaam and ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Abi Umayyah ibn al-Mugheerah with him. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “O my uncle, say Laa ilaaha ill-Allaah, a word for which I will bear witness for you before Allaah.” Abu Jahl and ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Abi Umayyah said, “O Abu Taalib, are you turning away from the religion of ‘Abd al-Muttalib?” The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) kept urging him to embrace Islam and they kept repeating the same thing to him, until the last thing that Abu Taalib said to them was, “On the path of ‘Abd al-Muttalib”, and he refused to say Laa ilaaha ill-Allaah. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I shall certainly keep asking Allaah to forgive you until I am told not to do that.”

Then Allaah revealed the words (interpretation of the meaning):

“It is not (proper) for the Prophet and those who believe to ask Allaah’s forgiveness for the Mushrikoon, even though they be of kin…”

[al-Tawbah 9:113].”


This hadeeth indicates that one may visit a sick kaafir relative, if there is the hope that he may embrace Islam. Al-Fadl ibn Ziyaad said: I heard Ahmad ibn Hanbal being asked about a Muslim man visiting one of the mushrikeen who was sick. He said: If he thinks that if he visits him whilst he is sick and tells him about Islam, that he may accept it, then let him visit him, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) visited the Jewish boy who was sick and told him about Islam.



Shaykh Sulaymaan al-‘Alwaan

Source: http://islam-qa.com/index.php?ref=13933&ln=eng


The following is from Sahih Al-Bukhaari, in Arabic:

1375 ـ حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ، أَخْبَرَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي، عَنْ صَالِحٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي سَعِيدُ بْنُ الْمُسَيَّبِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّهُ أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّهُ، لَمَّا حَضَرَتْ أَبَا طَالِبٍ الْوَفَاةُ جَاءَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَوَجَدَ عِنْدَهُ أَبَا جَهْلِ بْنَ هِشَامٍ، وَعَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ أَبِي أُمَيَّةَ بْنِ الْمُغِيرَةِ، قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لأَبِي طَالِبٍ ‏"‏ يَا عَمِّ، قُلْ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ، كَلِمَةً أَشْهَدُ لَكَ بِهَا عِنْدَ اللَّهِ ‏"‏‏.‏ فَقَالَ أَبُو جَهْلٍ وَعَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ أَبِي أُمَيَّةَ يَا أَبَا طَالِبٍ، أَتَرْغَبُ عَنْ مِلَّةِ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِبِ فَلَمْ يَزَلْ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَعْرِضُهَا عَلَيْهِ، وَيَعُودَانِ بِتِلْكَ الْمَقَالَةِ، حَتَّى قَالَ أَبُو طَالِبٍ آخِرَ مَا كَلَّمَهُمْ هُوَ عَلَى مِلَّةِ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِبِ، وَأَبَى أَنْ يَقُولَ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ‏.‏ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏"‏ أَمَا وَاللَّهِ لأَسْتَغْفِرَنَّ لَكَ، مَا لَمْ أُنْهَ عَنْكَ ‏"‏‏.‏ فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِيهِ ‏{‏مَا كَانَ لِلنَّبِيِّ‏}‏ الآيَةَ‏
.

Source: http://www.al-eman.com/hadeeth/viewchp.asp?BID=13&CID=47#s81


The following is the translation of the above hadith into the English language:

When the time of the death of Abu Talib approached, Allah's Apostle went to him and found Abu Jahl bin Hisham and 'Abdullah bin Abi Umaiya bin Al-Mughira by his side. Allah's Apostle said to Abu Talib, "O uncle! Say: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, a sentence with which I shall be a witness (i.e. argue) for you before Allah. Abu Jahl and 'Abdullah bin Abi Umaiya said, "O Abu Talib! Are you going to denounce the religion of Abdul Muttalib?" Allah's Apostle kept on inviting Abu Talib to say it (i.e. 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah') while they (Abu Jahl and Abdullah) kept on repeating their statement till Abu Talib said as his last statement that he was on the religion of Abdul Muttalib and refused to say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' (Then Allah's Apostle said, "I will keep on asking Allah's forgiveness for you unless I am forbidden (by Allah) to do so." So Allah revealed (the verse) concerning him (i.e. It is not fitting for the Prophet and those who believe that they should invoke (Allah) for forgiveness for pagans even though they be of kin, after it has become clear to them that they are companions of the fire (9.113).

[Translation of Sahih Al-Bukhaari by M. Muhsin Khan, Volume 2, Book 23, Number 442]



Regards,

Bluegazer

Wassalamu Alaikum
 

*Sana*

.~.Slave of Allah.~.
Assalaamualaikum,

When an Islamic Marriage/Nikaah is taking place, there is always an Imaam and two witnesses present.

1.)According to the Muslim Law it is absolutely necessary that a man or someone on his behalf and the woman or someone on her behalf should agree to the marriage at one meeting and the agreement should be witnessed by two adult witnesses.

2.)The words conveying proposal and acceptance must be uttered in each other's presence or in the presence of their agents, who are called Vakils or Qazi or more commonly called an Imaam or Sheikh. This is the person who reads the Nikaah or in western terms the vows of marriage. He asks both parties whether they accept or agree to be in this ever binding relationship or not.
3.)The other condition for a valid marriage is that the transaction must be completed at one meeting. A proposal made at one meeting and an acceptance at another meeting do not constitute a valid marriage.

4.)There must be reciprocity between offer and acceptance. The acceptance must not be conditional.

5.)Under the Sunni Law, the proposal and acceptance must be made in presence of two males or one male and two female witnesses who are sane, adult and Muslim. Under Shia Law, witnesses are not necessary at the time of marriage. They are required at the time of dissolution of marriage.

6.)The parties contracting marriage must be acting under their free will and consent.

I hope this answers your question.

Wasalaam.
 

*Sana*

.~.Slave of Allah.~.
Assalaamualaikum,

Roughly, this is the procedure to an Islamic Marriage/Nikaah:

1.)According to the Muslim Law it is absolutely necessary that a man or someone on his behalf and the woman or someone on her behalf should agree to the marriage at one meeting and the agreement should be witnessed by two adult witnesses.

2.)The words conveying proposal and acceptance must be uttered in each other's presence or in the presence of their agents, who are called Vakils or Qazi or more commonly called an Imaam or Sheikh. This is the person who reads the Nikaah or in western terms the vows of marriage. He asks both parties whether they accept or agree to be in this ever binding relationship or not.
3.)The other condition for a valid marriage is that the transaction must be completed at one meeting. A proposal made at one meeting and an acceptance at another meeting do not constitute a valid marriage.

4.)There must be reciprocity between offer and acceptance. The acceptance must not be conditional.

5.)Under the Sunni Law, the proposal and acceptance must be made in presence of two males or one male and two female witnesses who are sane, adult and Muslim. Under Shia Law, witnesses are not necessary at the time of marriage. They are required at the time of dissolution of marriage.

6.)The parties contracting marriage must be acting under their free will and consent.

I hope this answers your question.

Wasalaam.
 

danyal.ahmed

Junior Member
Ahmed

My Brother i dont ask all to tell wot is Nikah .....Syed Abu Talib the Uncle of Mohammad S.A.W was the man who Read the Nikah...
 

Bluegazer

Junior Member
Assalamu Alaikum brother danyal.ahmed


You wrote the following:

My Brother i dont ask all to tell wot is Nikah .....Syed Abu Talib the Uncle of Mohammad S.A.W was the man who Read the Nikah...


Dear brother, you still did not answer my question. I asked the following in post #5:

My question to danyal.ahmed is:

What do you mean by the term "Read the Nikah" ??


-----------------------------------------------------------------

Assalamu Alaikum sister Sana,


You wrote the following in post #10:

When an Islamic Marriage/Nikaah is taking place, there is always an Imaam and two witnesses present.


Actually, under the Shari'a [Islamic Law], there is no need for an imam to be present.


The following is a fatwa [religious opinion] of Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid. It's his answer to question no. 813 [Conditions for valid marriage contract]:

Question:

What is the correct Islamic procedure for a marriage ceremony, I mean if two Muslims are married (legally) without the presence of a religious "person" (like imam etc.), does that mean the marriage is non-existent in terms of Islam?


Answer:

All praise is due to Allaah.

A marriage contract is valid in Islam if the following conditions are met, even if the marriage does not take place in a court, or in the presence of a Judge or the Imaam of the masjid. In addition, it does not need to be written.

* The waliy (guardian) of the girl has accepted the proposal by saying, for example, "I marry you my daughter", and the one who proposed has replied, for example, by " I accept," or "I am satisfied" (i.e. with his acceptance).
* This takes place in the presence of two witnesses
* The woman is legally eligible to marry the man according to Islamic shari'ah (that is she is not a Mahram of the proposer [those to whom the proposer is forbidden to marry. etc.]) Allah knows best.



Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

Source: http://islam-qa.com/index.php?ref=813&ln=eng


So, if the above conditions are met, then the marriage is valid and there's no sin on the husband and the wife.

I think it's important here to mention that the witnesses should be men. Do not take my word as proof that the witnesses should be male, but please search for opinions of scholars well grounded in knowledge and known for their piety.


Having said the above, please bear in mind that many laws in Muslim countries nowadays require the marriage contract to be written and to be concluded in the presence of an official called the ma'thoon or an imaam or in front of a judge for many reasons:

1- It makes it much easier to get paperwork and documentation for the birth certificate of the children born from the marriage.

2- Many people are really ignorant, so the words used as the "proposal" and the words used as the "acceptance of the proposal" might be wrong or unclear. Therefore, it is vitally important for the parties of the marriage contract to get their words right and that their intentions are very clear.

3- The official [ma'thoon or imam or judge] must check that there's nothing that forbids the marriage from taking place.

For example, if the Muslim wife was a widow, then this official must make sure that 4 higri [Islamic lunar] months and 10 days have passed since the death of her former husband. Because ignorance is so prevalent, many ordinary Muslims might make a mistake by concluding the marriage within the 4 months and 10 days period.

4- There have been cases of fraud and other illegal actions. By requiring the official to be present when the marriage is concluded, these cases are reduced.


In some Muslim countries, the Court will not hear a case of a wife who's marriage contract was not authenticated by an official unless she is asking to prove that her children are the offspring of her husband.


In light of all of the above, I cannot say that marriage without an imam or ma'thoon or judge is haraam [forbidden] in Islam. At the same time, I strongly advise anyone who wishes to get married to authenticate the marriage by having the ma'thoon or imam or judge [according to the laws of the country they are in] present when the marriage takes place and that there's a written document proving the marriage took place, so that all the necessary paperwork will be in order.


I especially advise against any sister in Islam marrying without such procedures, since this might mean that the prospective husband will not be willing to admit this marriage took place if things go wrong.

-------------------------------------------------------

I believe the following fatwa [religious opinion] answers the attacks of Christian missionaries about the marriage of our Prophet Muhammad [peace be upon him] to Khadijah bint Khuwailid [may Allah be pleased with her]. It is found on the website supervised by Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid. It's an answer to question no. 34550 [How did the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) marry Khadeejah?]:

Question:

Many of my friends have asked me about having Affairs with there opposite sex.........Now I have told them this is Haram in Islam but they give me the reply by saying that Khadija (R.A.A.H) fell in love with out Prophet (S.A.S) And had married him. I have read a lot of books and even on the net i havent found any information about how they were married and all i knew was Khadija (R.A.A.H) SENT a message though a Slave girl who was the cousin of our Prophet (S.A.S). And Abu Talib (R.A.A.H) uncle of our Prophet (S.A.S) accepted the offer and wed them. Now i wanted to know that have they (Prophet (S.A.S) and Khadijah (R.A.A.H)) ever met prior to marraige?.


Answer:

Praise be to Allaah.

The reports of the seerah (Prophet’s biography) indicate that Khadeejah bint Khuwaylid (may Allaah be pleased with her) was a determined and intelligent woman, and she was also rich and had several kinds of trade. The men of her people were keen to marry her. She did not engage directly in trade herself, rather she used to employ men to work on her behalf.

News reached Khadeejah of the honest and trustworthy Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him); she heard a great deal about his honesty and trustworthiness, so she wanted to hire him to work for her and do trade on her behalf. She sent someone to him with an offer of work, and he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) agreed to that.

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) went out to do trade with the money of Khadeejah (may Allaah be pleased with her), and there was with him a slave of Khadeejah’s whose name was Maysarah. Maysarah saw the signs that happened to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) whilst travelling, and that amazed him, so he started to tell his mistress Khadeejah about everything that he had seen.

For example, when the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came to the city of Busra in Syria, he stopped in the shade of a tree, and one of the monks said to Maysarah, “No one ever stops under the shade of this tree but a Prophet.” And Maysarah used to see two angels shading the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) when the heat of the sun grew too intense.

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came back from that journey, and he had made far more money in trading for Khadeejah than anyone else ever had before. Khadeejah was impressed with the personality of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and she wanted to marry him. So she sent her friend Nafeesah bint Maniyyah to tell the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about that. He (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) agreed, and the marriage of Khadeejah (may Allaah be pleased with her) was arranged by her father Khuwaylid, according to the most sound reports, as mentioned by the scholars of seerah.

From the above it is clear that there was no inappropriate relationship between the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Khadeejah (nay Allaah be pleased with her) before he married her.

The morals of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) were sound and he lived a virtuous life; Allah protected him from everything that may have detracted from his message or that was contrary to modesty and chivalry.

If such a thing has happened – but he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is far above such a thing – the kuffaar of Quraysh would not have kept quiet about it. They would have regarded it as a great source of shame and they would have used it as a means to reject his religion and tarnish his reputation. But nothing of the sort happened, rather before his Prophethood they used to call him al-Saadiq (the honest one) and al-Ameen (the trustworthy one). They did not cast aspersions upon his chastity at all.

You should also note that the Prophets (peace be upon them) – all the Prophets – are the most perfect and best of human beings. Allaah does not choose anyone to convey His Message except those who are fit for it. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Allaah knows best with whom to place His Message”
[al-An’aam 6:124]

Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

This means, He knows best where to place His Message and who is most fit for that among His creation. This is like the verse (interpretation of the meaning):

“And they say: ‘Why is not this Qur’aan sent down to some great man of the two towns (Makkah and Taa’if)?’
Is it they who would portion out the Mercy of your Lord?”
[al-Zukhruf 43:31]
What they meant was, If this Qur’aan had been sent down to some great man or leading figure who was of high status in their eyes, “of the two towns” i.e., Makkah and al-Taa’if. That was because they – may Allaah curse them – despised the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) out of hatred and envy, and stubbornness and pride, as Allaah tells us (interpretation of the meaning):

“And when those who disbelieved (in the Oneness of Allaah) see you (O Muhammad), they take you not except for mockery (saying): “Is this the one who talks (badly) about your gods?” While they disbelieve at the mention of the Most Gracious (Allaah)”

[al-Anbiya’ 21:36]

And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And when they see you (O Muhammad), they treat you only in mockery (saying): ‘Is this the one whom Allaah has sent as a Messenger’”

[al-Furqaan 25:41]

“And indeed (many) Messengers before you were mocked at, but their scoffers were surrounded by the very thing that they used to mock at”

[al-An’aam 6:10]

This happened even though they were aware of his virtue, nobility and lineage, and the purity of his house and upbringing. Before the Revelation came to him, they used to refer to him amongst themselves as al-Ameen (the trustworthy one). The leader of the kuffaar, Abu Sufyaan, admitted that when Heraclius, the ruler of Rome, asked him. “What is his lineage amongst you?” He said, “He is of noble descent.” He asked,”Did you ever accuse him of lying before he said what he said?” He said, “No.” In this lengthy conversation the Roman ruler took the pure attributes of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as evidence that his Prophethood was real and that what he said was true.

The scholars (may Allaah have mercy on them) stated that the Prophets were protected from committing major sins and every kind of sin which points to the base character of the one who does it.

Ibn al-‘Arabi said: “Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was protected by his Lord against committing any sin, whether during the Jaahiliyyah or afterwards, as an honour from Allaah, so that he might occupy a great and lofty status. So throughout his life he was protected from sin.

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

You should note that the scholars differed as to whether the Prophets could commit sin. Al-Qaadi summed up the main points of this issue when he said… with regard to sin, there is no dispute that the Prophets were protected from committing any major sin. Similarly there was no dispute that they were protected from minor sins which reflect badly on a person and lower his status and damage his character. But they differed as to whether the Prophets could commit other kinds of minor sins. Most of the fuqaha’, hadeeth scholars and scholars of kalaam among the earlier and later generations are of the view that they could have committed such minor sins. They quote as evidence the apparent meaning of the Qur’aan and reports. Some of the fuqaha’ and scholars of kalaam among our imams are of the view that they were protected from minor sins just as they were protected from major sins, and that the position of Prophethood means that the Prophets were far above committing sin or deliberately going against Allaah’s commands. They commented on verses and ahaadeeth which refer to mistakes on the part of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and they interpreted them in a manner other than the apparent meaning. They said that these verses and ahaadeeth refer to incidents where a Prophet based his actions on his own reasoning, or he did what he did out of forgetfulness, or with permission from Allaah in cases where he feared that he would be blamed for it, or there might be mistakes that they made before Prophethood. This last view is the one which is correct. These are the words of al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad, may Allaah have mercy on him. And Allaah knows best.

Out of respect towards the position of Prophethood, the scholars said that whoever slanders any of the Prophets is a kaafir and must be executed.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said in Majma’ al-Fataawa, 35/123

The imams are agreed that whoever insults a Prophet should be executed. And an accusation of adultery is the worst kind of insult. See also Question no. 22809.

Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Mughni, 12/405

Whoever slanders the mother of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is to be executed even if he repents, whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir, but if he repents then his repentance will be accepted by Allaah, but the sentence of execution will not be waived because of his repentance, because of the rights of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

Then he said:

The ruling concerning slander of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is like the ruling on slander of his mother, because slandering his mother brings a sentence of execution because it is a slander against the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and against his lineage.

And Allaah knows best.

See Zaad al-Ma’aad, 1/77; al-Seerah al-Nabawiyyah by Dr. Akram Diya’ al-‘Umari, 1/112-114; al-Seerah al-Nabawiyyah by Dr. Mahdi Rizq-Allaah, p. 132; Af’aal al-Rasool (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) by Dr. Muhammad Sulaymaan al-Ashqar, 1/139-165; Ahkaam al-Qur’aan al-Kareem, 3/576.

Islam Q&A

Source: http://islam-qa.com/index.php?ref=34550&ln=eng


Regards,

Bluegazer

Wassalamu Alaikum
 
Top