Is it possible to study fiqh on your own?

arzafar

Junior Member
:salam2:

ive been thinking about learning some fiqh now that i have the correct understanding of islamic aqeedah. However, it seems to be a massive challenge. While there are no differences in aqeedah amongst scholars, it seems to me that there are differences on all other matters. :SMILY149:
even amongst contemporary scholars there are differences with regards to basic things like salah and hijab/niqab. everyone has their proof too.

so
1) is it possible to the know the truth?
2) can it be done without any formal teaching/training
3) how?
4) where to begin?

if i give up fiqh then ill probably learn quraan Inshallah, but i think ill always be confused about Islamic rulings.
 

saifkhan

abd-Allah
Salam alaikum

these have been my questions too.....
inshaa'Allah will see a helping hand....
If we can then...which book we should follow....and what should be the procedur...not to preach ...just to gather knowledge.......for the sake of Allah SWT

Jazakallahu Khair
wassalam
 

thariq2005

Praise be to Allah!
Wa 'alaykkum salaam wa rahmatullaah.

To be honest, differences opinion do exist and this is why taqleed to a certain extent is permissible (not blind following to the max). We as laymen are from those for whom it is better to follow the imaams (or even the imaams of 4 madhaahib) we trust (and not follow them in matters where clear evidence oppose them). Shaykh Salih al Fawzaan hafidhahullaah said:

People fall into four categories:

The first category is those who are able to made ijtihad in absolute terms, by referring directly to the Qur’aan and Sunnah and deriving rulings from them, and they do not follow any other scholars (taqleed).

This is the highest status, but this only applies to the one who fulfils the known conditions of ijtihaad, by having knowledge of the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and by having knowledge of Arabic in which the Qur’aan was revealed, and by having knowledge of al-muhkam and al-mutashaabih (clear, unambiguous texts and ambiguous texts), al-naasikh wa’l-mansookh (texts which abrogate others and texts which are abrogated), al-mutlaq wa’l-muqayyad (texts with absolute meanings and texts with limited meanings), al-khaas wa’l-‘aam (texts with specific meanings and texts with general meanings). He should also have knowledge of how to derive rulings, meaning that he should be qualified. Such a person may engage in ijtihaad. This category includes people like the four imams – Abu Haneefah, Maalik, al-Shaafa’i and Ahmad – as well as Sufyaan al-Thawri and al-Awzaa’i. To these people Allaah gave the ability to engage in ijtihaad.

The second category is those who cannot engage in ijtihaad in absolute terms, but they are able to weigh up the opinions of scholars and determine which is more correct, because of their knowledge of which opinions are based on evidence and which are not.

Such a person must follow that for which there is evidence, and shun that which goes against the evidence. This action is called tarjeeh (weighing up what is more correct) and is also known as al-ijtihaad al-madhhabi (ijtihaad based on the study of different views).

The third category is those who cannot engage in tarjeeh. Such a person is regarded as one of the muqallideen (those who follow other scholars), but if he knows that some opinion has no supporting evidence then he does not follow it. But so long as he does not know and it is not clear to him that it is contrary to the evidence, there is nothing wrong with him imitating and following the opinions of the trustworthy scholars.

The fourth category is the one who is unable to do any of the above; neither ijtihaad in an absolute sense nor weighing what is more correct nor following a specific madhhab, such as the ordinary Muslim, for example.

Such a person has to ask the people of knowledge, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “So ask of those who know the Scripture, if you know not” [al-Nahl 16:43]. So he should ask the one who be believes is most trustworthy and the scholar in whom he has the greatest confidence, of those whose knowledge and actions he trusts, and follow his fatwa.

These are the categories of people with regard to this issue.

What a person should do is know what level he is at, and he should not put himself in a higher position than he deserves. Indeed, the matter is more serious than that. He should fear Allaah, because it is the matter of halaal and haraam, of Paradise and Hell, so he should not indulge in matters that he does not have the knowledge and skill to deal with.


It is better for a student of knowledge to stick to one imaam that he trusts especially if he is a begineer in terms of seeking knowledge and not induldge too much into differences of opinion (because as a student of knowledge, differences of opinion are like one of the last things you study in fiqh). Shaykh Uthaymeen rahimahullaah said: It is good if a person focuses on one shaykh and makes him his main source, especially if he is a young beginner, for if the young beginner seeks knowledge from a number of people he will be confused. For people are not all of one opinion, especially nowadays. In the past, here in the Kingdom (Saudi Arabia) people never deviated from [the books] al-Iqnaa’ and al-Muntahaa, so their fatwaas were all the same and the bases of their fatwaas were all the same; no one differed from another, except in his delivery and style. But now, everyone who has memorized a hadeeth or two says, “I am the imaam to be followed. Imaam Ahmad was a man and we are men.” So now there is chaos. Everyone is issuing fatwaas and sometimes you hear fatwaas from these people which may you weep and laugh at the same time. I was thinking of recording these fatwas, but I was afraid that this might make me one of those who seek out their faults of their brothers, so I did not do it lest we transmit things that are as far from the truth as the earth is from the Pleiades.

I say: adhering to one scholar is very important when the seeker of knowledge is just starting out, so that he will not be confused. Hence our shaykhs forbade us to read al-Mughni and Sharh al-Muhadhdhab and other books which contain numerous opinions when we were starting out. One of our shaykhs told us that Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Abd al-Rahmaan Baabiteen (may Allaah have mercy on him), who was one of the great shaykhs of Najd, only read al-Rawd al-Murabba’ and never read anything else. He read it repeatedly but he discussed it in great detail and in great depth.

If a person has gained a great deal of knowledge, then he should look at the views of the scholars so as to benefit from them in both academic and practical terms. But when one is just starting out, my advice is to focus on one particular scholar and not go to anyone else.


With regards to books, Shaykh al Albaanee rahimahullaah recommends "Fiqh us sunnah" by Sayyid Saabiq (amazing book, goes through a lot of fiqh matters in details).

Shaykh 'Uthaymeen rahimahullaah recommends a few books, but from those one that is available in english is "Umdatul Fiqh" by Ibn Qudaamah rahimahullah

You could also look into Buloogh al Maraam by Ibn Hajr rahimahullaah, although this book helps in terms of studying ahadeeth as Shaykh Uthaymeen says, but also can be useful for Fiqh, since this book is based on such ahadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah :saw2: which have been sources of Fiqh.

Finally, that last book I would recommend which is very very simple, easy to understand etc, is one by Shaykh Salih al Fawzaan hafidhahullaah, "A summary to Islamic jurispudence". (I was also told "Fiqh made easy" by Shaykh Salih as Sadlaan hafidhahullaah is very simple too)

The above books are available in english, alhamdulillaah. And remember you can always study Qur'aan and fiqh at the same time, and that is perhaps much better, wAllaahu a'lam

As I said before, it is best to start studying books with just the evidences at the moment, and not read up on differences of opinion as this will just further delay you from completing a fiqh book.
 
Top