somewhatinspired
Junior Member
well i know that most Muslims regard music as haram,
yet many others defend that there is only one weak Hadith mentioning such.
and from what i read, nothing mentioned in the Quran.
i was always under the impression that music is haram.
i will be honest i never questioned it,
it is my understanding that most people don't question it, because they assume it is strongly forbidden. but as i look, i cannot find evidence of such.
just people talking about how it distracts you from your practice, and corrupts the youth. haram haram haram....but i wanna see the evidence.
i am a drummer, and i have always enjoyed all sorts of music, it was always something that pained me to think about leaving behind. but Muslims told me i would just lose interest in it after being stronger in faith. that bothered me but at the same time it didn't, because i supposed that it was right.
well i have been listening to Dawud Wharnsbys latest music, (which has music) . along with Yusuf Islams latest music, and i find nothing wrong or distracting about either. in my opinion it makes me exited about my faith, and helps me remember and think about it more.
i am not talking about negative music here (sex filled hip hop, violent metal, or anything negative).
clearly love songs would be haram if they were graphic, or talking about lust.
but what about positive family oriented music for anyone.
filled with pleasant instruments and a good message?
i mean if anyone can provide me with good reasoning behind why most Muslims regard it as haram, i am more than eager to listen.
but if you can only tell me that certain scholars agree it is haram, i would like to know based on what.
and i would like to see what everyone opinions are on the subject.
many scholars have their own interests. someone pays for their food.
and if their opinion becomes controversial, they become controversial.
communists discourage music because they see it as an easy way for people to rebel.
im not saying that the scholars who deem musical instruments haram are communists or anything absurd, im just trying to find their justification.
is it merely because they perceive it to follow along the lines of haram based on how they see it socially affecting us? or is there some clear ruling about it.
correct me if i am wrong, but Hadith has to support something in the Quran, so if there is nothing clearly mentioned in the Quran, and there is only one weak hadith pertaining to it, shouldn't it be considered invalid?...
i wonder about it along the lines of cigarettes.
they are clearly bad for you, but
they were not known to people at the time of the profit(pbuh).
nothing about them is mentioned in Quran or Hadith.
many Muslims smoke them stating such.
yet we can clearly say they are haram due to their affects.
the only difference being that music was clearly not unknown to the people at the time of the profit(pbuh).
i mean if there were songs about lust or, pertaining to certain pagan rituals, holidays or perhaps paying tribute to a certain god or the like, i can clearly see the justification behind banning such things. and music may only have been played in like situations at that time.
but does that mean music itself is haram?
we aren't supposed to paint figures or sculpt them. but i don't think painting and sculpture are wrong.
and if cigarettes were completely safe, i would probably smoke them if i could find some that smelled sweet.
ok, i explained my thoughts and questions, i am hoping that i find many opinions.
so have at it.
because i haven't made up my own yet.
but i am sure you can see that i am hoping to see a place for music in Islam, and not just at weddings(which i find to be absurd)
because you cant drink only at certain days or be an adulterer on certain days.
i am pretty sure that which is forbidden is very clear, and permanent.
and honestly this whole music thing is very unclear.
i like nasheed and all, but it just leaves something to the imagination as far as melody goes.
yet many others defend that there is only one weak Hadith mentioning such.
and from what i read, nothing mentioned in the Quran.
i was always under the impression that music is haram.
i will be honest i never questioned it,
it is my understanding that most people don't question it, because they assume it is strongly forbidden. but as i look, i cannot find evidence of such.
just people talking about how it distracts you from your practice, and corrupts the youth. haram haram haram....but i wanna see the evidence.
i am a drummer, and i have always enjoyed all sorts of music, it was always something that pained me to think about leaving behind. but Muslims told me i would just lose interest in it after being stronger in faith. that bothered me but at the same time it didn't, because i supposed that it was right.
well i have been listening to Dawud Wharnsbys latest music, (which has music) . along with Yusuf Islams latest music, and i find nothing wrong or distracting about either. in my opinion it makes me exited about my faith, and helps me remember and think about it more.
i am not talking about negative music here (sex filled hip hop, violent metal, or anything negative).
clearly love songs would be haram if they were graphic, or talking about lust.
but what about positive family oriented music for anyone.
filled with pleasant instruments and a good message?
i mean if anyone can provide me with good reasoning behind why most Muslims regard it as haram, i am more than eager to listen.
but if you can only tell me that certain scholars agree it is haram, i would like to know based on what.
and i would like to see what everyone opinions are on the subject.
many scholars have their own interests. someone pays for their food.
and if their opinion becomes controversial, they become controversial.
communists discourage music because they see it as an easy way for people to rebel.
im not saying that the scholars who deem musical instruments haram are communists or anything absurd, im just trying to find their justification.
is it merely because they perceive it to follow along the lines of haram based on how they see it socially affecting us? or is there some clear ruling about it.
correct me if i am wrong, but Hadith has to support something in the Quran, so if there is nothing clearly mentioned in the Quran, and there is only one weak hadith pertaining to it, shouldn't it be considered invalid?...
i wonder about it along the lines of cigarettes.
they are clearly bad for you, but
they were not known to people at the time of the profit(pbuh).
nothing about them is mentioned in Quran or Hadith.
many Muslims smoke them stating such.
yet we can clearly say they are haram due to their affects.
the only difference being that music was clearly not unknown to the people at the time of the profit(pbuh).
i mean if there were songs about lust or, pertaining to certain pagan rituals, holidays or perhaps paying tribute to a certain god or the like, i can clearly see the justification behind banning such things. and music may only have been played in like situations at that time.
but does that mean music itself is haram?
we aren't supposed to paint figures or sculpt them. but i don't think painting and sculpture are wrong.
and if cigarettes were completely safe, i would probably smoke them if i could find some that smelled sweet.
ok, i explained my thoughts and questions, i am hoping that i find many opinions.
so have at it.
because i haven't made up my own yet.
but i am sure you can see that i am hoping to see a place for music in Islam, and not just at weddings(which i find to be absurd)
because you cant drink only at certain days or be an adulterer on certain days.
i am pretty sure that which is forbidden is very clear, and permanent.
and honestly this whole music thing is very unclear.
i like nasheed and all, but it just leaves something to the imagination as far as melody goes.