Shaykh Al-Albani Dicusses with a Jihaadi

Salem9022

Junior Member
Debate with a Jihadi
Author: Shaikh al-Albaanee
http://www.albani.co.uk/

The discussion starts with al-Jihaad supporter :-

Al-jihad supporter : We have no doubt that you are one of the first of the scholars in the century to call for the return to the understanding of the Salaf. There is no doubt that the issue of jihad is an issue of disagreement among those who follow manhaj as-Salaf assali7. In the issue of jihad, we call the people to fight jihad under two conditions : The first is that is has to be done in pure intention for the sake of Allah. The second that it has to be under the banner of Islam. However we hear from the devout muslim youth other conditions that they narrate from you which we never heard about in hadith, such conditions are Islamic knowledge (or Education and purification - Tasfiyah wa Tarbiyah) and having Khilafa or an Islamic state. These conditions we hear a lot from the brothers who follow manhaj as-Salaf, and I am among those who follow this manhaj insha' Allah. My Question is : do these conditions have any reference in the Sunnah ? or are they only an ijtihad regarding the current situation and\or conditions? and before that do you really call for these conditions?

Al-Albani : first of all, we agreed to discuss this issue with you to find out about your da3wa

Al-jihad supporter : I told you about it.

Al-Albani : Then, explain your da3wa. Your questions are premature now, I want to understand what you da3wa is for

Al-jihad supporter : my da3wa is clear, to do jihad according to the conditions I mentioned. Intention because the prophet KAW said "whoever fought for the word of Allah to be the higher word is fi sabeel Allah". Under the banner of Islam because the prophet KAW said "whoever fought for the sake of 3asabiyah supporting one group or fighting another and died, he died the death of jahiliyah."

Al-Albani : OK. Do we need an Amir to do jihad ?

Al-jihad supporter : No.

Al-Albani : so we do jihad in a big disorganized mess ? (Arabic : Fawda)

Al-jihad supporter : No ... but

Al-Albani : Also, your first condition which is the pure intention. This condition in every worship so we are done with it. Your second, under the Islamic banner, do you imagen jihad without an Amir? how can we have an Islamic banner without an Amir for that banner ?

Al-jihad supporter : We can do jihad in this manner like if a muslim goes to a kafir enemy leader, and kills him.

Al-Albani : But we were talking about the jihad of a group. Jihad under an Islamic banner is it the jihad of one person or the jihad of a group ? Also, a group of Muslims that leave for jihad, do they not need an Amir to lead them ?

Al-jihad supporter : Yes, yes of course. A group of Muslims who travel or leave for jihad need an Amir. and If a group of Muslims of more than 3 leave for Jihad they need an Amir.

Al-Albani : Then why did you not mention this as a condition?

Al-jihad supporter : well, okay, let us make it a third condition.

Al-Albani : Okay for the Fard 3ayn jihad, do we need a jama3a for it or can it be done as individuals ?

Al-jihad supporter : Either case.

Al-Albani : This is not an answer.

Al-jihad supporter : why is that ?

Al-Albani : We said that jihad is two kinds : Fard Kifayah, which only a small group of Muslims can do, and if a group do it, the rest of the Muslims are not questioned about it. This kind of jihad individuals can do on their own. Fard 3ayn which ALL the Muslims have to do it in a specific area. To do this kind of jihad, do we not need an Amir to lead the Muslims ?

Al-jihad supporter : yes we need an Amir for this group if it fights or if it doesn't fight.

Al-Albani : Good Good, we return to say Amir to mean a Khalifa of the Muslims.

Al-jihad supporter : no not a khalifa.

Al-Albani : Why? is it dangerous to say khalifa?

Al-jihad supporter : Yes of course, because this means we want to reap the fruit before we plant the trees.

Al-Albani : This is what I see you doing. You say you want an Amir for the whole group of Muslims to lead jihad and at the same time you don't want him to be the khalifa! is this what you want ?

Al-jihad supporter : well, yes.

Al-Albani : !! Okay then where is this Amir? and who is this Amir? and can we have more than one Amir? We are now on the condition we agreed on before, which is that we need an Amir, and you claim that we need an Amir to lead this group jihad without him being the khalifa. Which do we get first, the Amir or the jihad ? this is like asking do we pray before the athan or after. which comes first ?

[after a while of arguing around]

Al-jihad supporter : Okay we do need an Amir for the Fard 3ayn jihad before we start the jihad.

Al-Albani : Excellent. Then do we call to have an Amir first, or do we call for the jihad first.

Al-jihad supporter : well, both at the same time.

Al-Albani : la hawla wa la quwaata illa billah. We just agreed that we need an Amir for Jihad al-3ayn before we start the jihad. The next question is do we call for an Amir First or do we call for the jihad first? This group, all kinds of groups need an Amir. To call for this kind of jihad we do need an Amir first, the Amir will call for the mujahideen and send those here and those there.

Al-jihad supporter : okay what if a group of Muslims read in the Quran about jihad and want to do jihad, so they gather for jihad and then appoint an Amir on them.

Al-Albani : Ya akhi what you are describing is a case of jihad Fard al-Kifayah. For Fard Al-Kifayah it is okay for a small group to gather and go do jihad. For Fard al-3ayn we need the whole group of Muslims. How can we have to the whole group of Muslims if we don't have a unified leadership for this kind for jihad? This kind of Amir, I do not see any of the Mujahideen calling for it. Why do you not call for that Amir?

Al-jihad supporter : Okay then let us call for this Amir.

Al-Albani : OK, then what are the characters for this Amir, in your opinion?

Al-jihad supporter : [some characters ]

Al-Albani : and do you see an Amir with these qualities ?

Al-jihad supporter : yes, many.

Al-Albani : where ?

Al-jihad supporter : everywhere.

Al-Albani : We said that we need an Amir for the whole group, ie for all the Muslims. How can we have more than one Amir for all the Muslims ?

Al-jihad supporter : ... [arguing around]

Al-Albani : do you know what does the hadith of Huthayfah bin yaman (fa in lam yakun lahom jama3a wa la imam) say about this, does it lead to the conclusion that this jihad needs a khalifa, or otherwise ?

[hadith narrated in bukhari , Kitab al-manaqib, hadith #3338 hadith says When people were asking the prophet about the goodness, i was asking about the evil in fear that it may get to me, so I asked "oh prophet of Allah we were in jahiliyah then Allah brought this goodness, will there be any evil after it?" the prophet said "yes there will", I said "will there be goodness after it?" he said "yes and it has some impurities" i asked "and what are its impurities?" he SAW said " people who guide without my guidance, you know of them and deny." I asked "is there evil after this goodness?" he said "yes, there will be preachers who preach for the doors of hellfire, whoever answers them they throw him into hellfire" so i said "oh prophet of Allah, describe them for us" he SAW said "they are from u and they speak from our language." so i asked "what should I do if i witness that?" the prophet SAW said "stick with the group of Muslims and their leader" i asked "what if they had no leader?" he said "if they had no leader or imam, then leave all these groups even if you had to bite on a tree until your death."]

Al-jihad supporter : what does this hadith have to do with our discussion?

Al-Albani : did Huthayfah not ask the prophet about what to do when there are callers to the doors of hellfire ? the prophet answered that he must stick to the imam of the jama3a, if there is no imam then let him stay away from every jama3a. Do these conditions apply to today? do we not have people who claim to be Muslims yet they are callers to hellfire? is Khilafa not missing ?

Al-jihad supporter : I prefer to to discuss other hadiths, like "there is still a portion of my nation fighting for the right, they do not care whoever disagreed with them or let them down."

Al-Albani : What does this have to do with our discussion? We are not in disagreement about calling for jihad. We are in agreement that jihad is a an obligation (Fard 3ayn) today, what we disagree on is that do we need a khalifa first or not. What you quoted adds nothing to the argument. We both agree that jihad is a Fard. Do you understand? What we disagree about is the issue of needing a khalifa to start this jihad.

Al-jihad supporter : OK.

Al-Albani : notice that the prophet advised Huthayfah to stick with the imam of the Muslims and their main group. You have that all the conditions in that hadith are true today ..

Al-jihad supporter : true ...

Al-Albani : and the prophet said if the Muslims had no imam or jama3a, to leave all the groups. so what do you do now ?

Al-jihad supporter : well, we try to look for the group of Muslims and find an imam for it.

Al-Albani : this is what we call for! jihad is fard, but right now is not the time for it. We need the imam first and that the prophet ordered you to follow and stick with his group.

Al-jihad supporter : How do we know that we can not do jihad until we get this khalifa that is indeed necessary ?

Al-Albani : the hadith says if the Muslims had no one leader then leave all the groups. And we already said before that the jihad for fard al-3ayn has to be done the jama3a led by a leader to all the Muslims, an Amir. If the Muslims had no leader they stay away from ALL groups. How can they do group jihad if they should at the same time stay away from all groups??? you are contradicting what you already agreed on. islamically we have only one banner, one group and one leader. We do need this one group to start the fard al-3ayn jihad.

Al-jihad supporter : ...

Al-Albani : now what I want to do is prove to you that this Amir of the fard 3ayn jihad must be a khalifa, not just an Amir. The dallel is the hadith of Huthayfah again. Sometimes as you know the evidence is clear and sometimes not very, (qat3i al-dilalah, or thahiri al-dilalah). Let us consider an example of a Shaikh advising his student on the guidelines of this hadith. The student asks his Shaikh what to do to to avoid the evil, the Shaikh says stick with the imam of the Muslims. The student answers that the Muslims have no khalifa, so the Shaikh advises him to stay away from all the groups. This student is obedient to his Shaikh and this Shaikh that is following his prophet. what would this student do? he would go ahead living his life in a valley looking after his sheep or whatever, worshiping Allah. Where is jihad? if it was a wajib on this muslim to fight then the Shaikh would tell him to fight, and not to stay away from every group. is there a jihad here? as long as there is no imam then there is no jihad. This evidence is Qat3i al-Dilalah. Jihaad must be in the supervision of an Imam, or khalifa. But let me tell you about some thing that troubles many of the students of knowledge, that there are many groups that fight like the afghan or those in Syria a decade or more ago. Those people, if they want to fight they must be under the leadership of one Amir, that doesn't mean that Syrians fight in Afghanistan and afghanis in Syria, no. It means that both fighting groups must be under the supervision on one Imam and one khalifa. If there was no one imam and no one jama3a (not in the meaning of two fighting groups, but in the meaning of one group in their unity of leadership, but could be more than one group of fighters each fighting in a part of the Islamic world), both groups would be operating on their own.

To do this fard 3ayn jihad, the wajib of the Muslims is unity, the unity needs a khalifa. To establish this thing we must start with education and purification (Tasfiyah wa Tarbiyah). We can not start with jihad right now.

You say that there are many groups for jihad, yet all these groups are in disagreement and as Allah said in Quran "wa la tanaza3o fa tafshalu wa thahaba ree7okum". We are today many like the flowing of the river, what you want to do is give legitimacy to these ghutha' groups.


Al-jihad supporter : okay then how does this education and purification (Tasfiyah wa Tarbiyah) lead to khilafa?

Al-Albani : History repeats itself. everybody claims that the prophet is their role model. Our prophet SAW spent the first half of his message in making da3wa, and he started with it not with jihad. The prophet first raised his companions Islamic education like he educated them to say the word of truth and not be afraid of it, he also taught them the Islamic teachings. We know that our Islam today is not like it was when Allah revealed "today I have completed your religion", many things have indeed been added to Islam, do you not agree?

Al-jihad supporter : Yes I fully agree. but there are many Quranic proofs that jihad is an important obligation!

Al-Albani : I do not deny that, but ya akhi the question is "where do we start from?" My da3wa is : to do this jihad we need an Amir, to get this Amir we must work on the Tasfiyah and Tarbiyah. think about this on your own, by considering the hadith of Huthayfah which do we need first jihad or the Amir ?

Al-jihad supporter : has anyone before called for Tasfiyah and Tarbiyah before jihad ?

Al-Albani : May Allah be merciful with you. Tell me when did the Muslims not have a unified khalifa?

Al-jihad supporter : What about the time of Ali and Mu3awiyah?

Al-Albani : You mean you have a doubt that Ali was right, and that Mu3awiyah was wrong?

Al-jihad supporter : No ... but

Al-Albani : no "but"s. How many khulafa' were there?

[after a while of discussion]

Al-jihad supporter : OK, OK, one.

A listener : To be frank my Shaikh, this discussion is going nowhere : if one does not make his intention and mind pure he will never understand.

Al-Albani : This is indeed a good advice. We live in an age where one of the fatal characters is spread, which is everyone liking his own opinion. Today everybody who reads a bit of Quran or learns a bit of A7kam and Hadeeths, he thinks he is something in 3ilm although he can not read the hadiths without errors, and then he wants to argue everything he sees ...

Al-jihad supporter .. trying to interrupt ...

Al-Albani : the time for discussion is over. I will take the advice of the brother. My advice to the students of knowledge is not proceed to preach to the people something that may lead them to great misguidence (Dalal). He should check with the people of knowledge before he jumps to conclusion. It is one of the disasters of the muslim youth today to quickly adopt opinions without looking into the opinions of the Salaf and khalaf regards these issues. I advise Muslims to research this especially in the issues that concern the group such as jihad. Jihaad is, without doubt the the pride of Islam and of the basis of Islam (arkan) and the verses and hadiths regards this are known to everybody insha' Allah. But this jihad has its conditions and introductions. From its basic conditions that the group that does it must be in agreement to return to Quran and Sunnah in their rulings (a7kam). This in fact needs a great time of education, purification and of scholars and preachers, like the prophet educated his companions. We notice that Mujahids call for whatever of the Muslims to join in the fight, and when they go to fight they find disagreement among themselves in matters of their faith and the basics of Islam. How do these people get ready to go for Jihad when they are yet to understand what is obligatory on them of Aqeedah ??!! This my brother, leads us to understand that Jihaad is not to be discussed, but we must discuss its introductions. The first introduction is, as we attest before Allah, the khalifa. Because if the amirs exist today and the bond I talked about (common understanding of Islam) does not exist among them then they will turn against one another and fight each other. They must be all for one methodology and one understanding. I therefore advise every muslim to work by the hadeeth of Ibn al-yaman, leave all the groups and stay by yourself. And this is not to mean to live in isolation, no it means not to join one or another group. You can do yourself and all the Muslims good with your knowledge. This is a reminder and the reminder benefits the believers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

alkathiri

As-Shafaa'i(Brother)
Is itThere can not be jihad without a legitime Imam or a common banner for mujahideen

al-Qurtubi said:

وأباحت طائفة البراز ولم تذكر بإذن الإمام ولا بغير إذنه هذا قول مالك سئل مالك عن الرجل يقول بين الصفين : من يبارز ؟ فقال : ذلك إلى نيته إن كان يريد بذلك الله فأرجو ألا يكون به بأس قد يفعل ذلك فيما مضى وقال الشافعي : لا بأس بالمبارزة قال ابن المنذر : المبارزة بإذن الإمام حسن وليس على من بارز بغير إذن الإمام حرج وليس ذلك بمكروه لأني لا أعلم خبرا يمنع منه
"A group of scholars allowed to fight a duel with enemy and they did not stipulate it weather with the permission of Imam or without his permission. It's opinion.of Malik. Malik was asked about a man who stood between two troops (i.e. between muslims and enemies) and asked (the enemy): "Who wants to fight?" Malik said: "it depends on his intention, if he intends with it to please Allah, then I hope there is nothing wrong! People did it before" Shafi' said: "There is nothing wrong with fighting a duel." Ibn al-Mundhir said: "Fighting a duel with permission of imam is good, but there is no sin upon one who does it without his permission! It's not makruh, because I do not know any narration forbidding it!"
"Jami li Ahkam al-Quran", 4/249
Muassasa ar-Risala



And Abd ar-Rahman al-Hattab al-Maliki said:

سئل عبد الله بن وهب عن القوم يواقعون العدو هل لاحد أن يبارز بغير إذن الامام ؟ فقال: إن كان الامام عنده لم يجز له أن يبازر إلا بإذنه، وإن كان غير عدل فليبارز وليقاتل بغير إذنه. قلت له: والمبارزة والقتال عندكم واحد ؟ قال: نعم. قال ابن رشد: وهذا كما قال: إن الامام إذا كان غير عدل لم يلزمهم استئذانه في مبارزة ولا قتال إذ قد ينهاهم عن غرة قد ثبتت له على غير وجه نظر يقصده لكونه غير عدل في أموره فيلزمه طاعته، فإنما يفترق العدل من غير العدل في الاستئذان له لا في طاعته إذا أمر بشئ أو نهى عنه، لان الطاعة للامام من فرائض الغزو فواجب على الرجل طاعة الامام فيما أحب أو كره، وإن كان غير عدل ما لم يأمره بمعصية
"Abdullah bin Wahb was asked about a group which attacks the enemy, is it permissible to fight a duel without permission of Imam? He said: "If imam is present there, it's not allowed for him to fight a duel, but with his permission and if he is not rightful (i.e. fasiq) , let him fight a duel and they all may fight against the enemy without his permission." I (Zuwnan Abdulmalik bin Hasan) said to him: "Mubarazah (fighting a duel) and qital (fighting) has the same ruling according to you?" he said: "Yes!" Ibn Rush said: it's as he said: If Imam is not rightful, then neither for dueling, nor fighting his permission is not neccessary for them, because he would have forbidden them to attack and it should be examined in his case because he is not rightful in his affairs. But he should be obeyed in any way. Because there is difference between "being rightfull" and "being unfair" when it concerns "permission". There is not such difference in obedience when he orders sth or forbids sth, because obedience to imam is from the obligations of battle and it's wajib upon people to obey Imam in everything that he likes or dislikes and even if he is not rightfull he should be obeyed in matters which is not disobedience to Allah..."
"Mawahib al-Jalil", 3/349



Scholars of Shafi madhhab say that it's makruh without imams permission and it's about the aggressive type of jihad, not when muslims are attacked.
Imam Nawawi said:

يكره غزو بغير إذن الإمام أو نائبه


"Fighting without permission from Imam and his deputy is makruh!"


"Minhaj at-Talibin", Kitab as-Siyar, pg: 519

And great scholar of Shafi madhhab Khatib al-Shirbini in his commentary on Imam Nawawi's "Minhaj at-Talibin" said about these words:

( يكره غزو بغير إذن الإمام أو نائبه )
تأدبا معه ، ولأنه أعرف من غيره بمصالح الجهاد ، وإنما لم يحرم ؛ لأنه ليس فيه أكثر من التغرير بالنفوس وهو جائز في الجهاد .
وينبغي كما قال : الأذرعي تخصيص ذلك بالمتطوعة أما المرتزقة فلا يجوز لهم ذلك ؛ لأنهم مرصدون لمهمات تعرض للإسلام يصرفهم فيها الإمام ، فهم بمنزلة الأجراء .
تنبيه : استثنى البلقيني من الكراهة صورا .
إحداها : أن يفوته المقصود بذهابه للاستئذان .
ثانيها : إذا عطل الإمام الغزو وأقبل هو وجنوده على أمور الدنيا كما يشاهد .
ثالثها : إذا غلب على ظنه أنه لو استأذنه لم يأذن له .


"Fighting without permission from Imam and his deputy is makruh!"
Because his status should be respected and because he is more knowledgable than others in matters of jihad. But it's not haram (to fight without his permission), because there is nothing more than exposing yourself to danger and it's permissable in Jihad.
It should be - as al-Adhrai' said - limited only for volunteers. As for a professional army (those who are payed for their service) it's not allowed for them, because they are allocated in the strategic places around the country to defend Islam and Imam is in charge of them and they are like hired workers.
NOTICE: al-Balqini exempted following cases from "karaha":
First: If seeking permission would delay it so that the benefit of fighting would be lost.
Second: If the Imam neglects jihad and he and his soldiers are attached to this world. As we observe it happening today.
Third: If they have well-grounded suspicion that if the permission is sought it would not be granted."


"Mughni al-Muhtaj", 4/220
 

Salem9022

Junior Member
--------- : ) -------------


It didnt take long for you to respond.

Now since we Muslims don't follow people blindly and take the 4 Madhabs as infalliable, I would like to ask you this.

If we muslims don't need an Imam to fight for Fard al 3ayn, then who calls for Jihad? and if there is no Single Imam(Khilafah) then how you suppose to have a Unified leader calling for Jihad as Shaykh Al-Albani Rahiemullah mentioned?
 

alkathiri

As-Shafaa'i(Brother)
--------- : ) -------------


It didnt take long for you to respond.

Now since we Muslims don't follow people blindly and take the 4 Imams as Infalliable, I would like to ask you this.

If we muslims don't need an Imam to fight for Fard al 3ayn, then who calls for Jihad? and if there is no Single Imam(Khilafah) then how you suppose to have a Unified leader calling for Jihad as Shaykh Al-Albani Rahiemullah mentioned?

I had to post....when you start to post.

Ya akhi, i do not want to give my own opinions but something to think about is if the attack is sudden, having the permission of an imam might lose some precious minutes. We( you and me) might not be able to understand this because we have not been in wars before.

I want to ask you something do you regard Shaykh Albani( may Allah bless him with Jannatul Firdaos) and brother Rabee' Madkhali to be infallible?
 

Salem9022

Junior Member
khalas the discussion is finished.

May Allah guide you and me and all the Muslims to the right Path. Aameen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Top