I would like to differ with it...Dr Israr although defends wahdat ul wajood but the explanation you wrote that 'Allah and creation being one and the same' is called 'hamaoost' and not wahdat ul wajood. People mix these two and this creates problems.
Wahdat ul wajood only means that the reality is only Allah and rest every thing is actually a mirage or illusion....same is refered in quran in surah hadeed that this life is only an illusion.....
the second point was that he uses philosopy in his lectures....I dont find anything bad in it.....it is only a matter of intellect.
The best way would be to listen to his lectures on 'Reality and kinds of Shirk' from the tanzeem's website....they will explain his aqeedah on wahdat ul wajood. and by the way wahdat ul wajood has never been considered (if understood in its true meaning) bad in the ummat's ulems. the problem is that people out of ignorance mix it with 'hamaoost' which is a pure shirk.
Anyways, the thing I like most about him is that he has dedicated his life to establish a platform to initiate a revolutionary struggle for the establishment of Deen-e-Islam. I have seen his living place, I've found him humble in manners and he maintains very low living standard. Moreover, he was the only one who openly challanged General Musharaf's decision of allowing US to attack Afghanistan in a meeting called by Musharaf including Ulemas, scholars ect in 2001.
I dont say that he is perfect, but I think that before we decide an openion about someone, we must visit him, clearify thing with him and must not stay on hearsay....