U.S. Sanctions on Iran

US imposes new sanctions on Iran

The US has announced new sanctions against Iran, targeting the defence ministry, the Revolutionary Guard and a number of banks.

Condoleezza Rice, secretary of state, on Thursday said the measures are designed to punish Iran for its support of "terrorist organisations" in Iraq and the Middle East, missile sales and nuclear activities.

Iran denounced the sanctions as illegal and "doomed to failure".

Rice, speaking at a news conference with Henry Paulson, the treasury secretary, said: "Today, Secretary Paulson and I are announcing several new steps to increase the costs to Iran of its irresponsible behaviour."

The US maintains that it wants to pressure Iran into ending its nuclear programme, suggesting that it could be used for warfare and not merely for producing electricity.

The US state and treasury departments also designated the Revolutionary Guard Corps a "proliferator of weapons of mass destruction" and its elite Quds Force as a "supporter of terrorism".

The sanctions will cut off more than 20 Iranian entities, including individuals and companies owned or controlled by the Revolutionary Guards from the American financial system and is likely to effect the international banking community.

The sanctions cover three Iran state-owned banks, including Bank Melli.

Rice said: "These actions will help to protect the international financial system from the illicit activities of the Iranian government.

"They will provide a powerful deterrent to every international bank and company that thinks of doing business with the Iranian government."


Counter-productive


However, some analysts argue that such measures are more likely to paint Iran into a corner.

Mehran Kamrava, a political analyst: "It is likely to actually be counter-productive, particularly at a time when Iran continues its negotiations with the European Union and with the IAEA.

"I think it is an action designed more for public consumption back in the United States."

The US has long labelled Iran a "state supporter of terrorism", and has been working for years to gain support for tougher sanctions from the world's most powerful countries.

The UK said it backed the latest sanctions, promising to take the lead in pulling together a third round of UN Security Council sanctions.

The sanctions are believed to be the first of their type taken by the US against the armed forces of another government, and are the broadest set of punitive measures against Iran since 1979.

They could affect any number of foreign companies, forcing them to stop doing business with the Revolutionary Guards.

Iran reaction

Mohammad Ali Hosseini, Iran's foreign ministry spokesman, said: "Such a decision by a state that both manufactures and develops weapons of mass destruction and supports terrorist groups will not disturb the development and progress of Iran and its legitimate institutions.

"The ridiculous accusations by American officials cannot save them from the Iraqi crisis that they have themselves created."

Hosseini also described the unilateral US sanctions as being contrary to international law.

"The hostile American policies towards the respectable people of Iran and the country's legal institutions are contrary to international law, without value and, as in the past, doomed to failure."

Impact

Ali Reza Ronaghi, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, said the sanctions are likely to make life more difficult for Iranians.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard

Estimated to number between 125,000 and 350,000 outside regular Iranian military's chain of command

Has own navy, air force and special forces

Wields strong influence over Iranian political life and widely involved in country's economy

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, rose through ranks of Guard and won presidency with support of its veterans' network.
He said: "These banks that are being designated are major banks that pay the monthly wages of Iranian workers, Iranian government people, and it's not easy for Iranians to do any business with any foreign country from now on."

The Revolutionary Guards, formed to safeguard Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, has pushed well beyond its military roots, and now runs car factories, construction firms and operates newspapers and oilfields.

Ronaghi said: "They are making pipelines, dams, roads and tunnels - wherever they are needed.

"They have many financial partners in foreign countries and if they are deprived from doing business with them, it's going to be a problem for the Iranian government to continue construction of the country."

A senior Iranian member of parliament said the sanctions were a "strategic mistake" that would increase distrust between the two countries.

Kazem Jalali, a spokesman for parliament's foreign affairs and security commission, said: "The Revolutionary Guards is an official force in Iran and it is clear that labelling them terrorists is interfering in the domestic affairs of a sovereign nation."

History of sanctions


Relations between the US and Iran have remained tense since the Islamic republic was established.

In 1979, when Iranian students seized the US embassy in Tehran, taking 63 Americans hostage, Jimmy Carter, the then-US president, severed diplomatic ties and imposed the first sanctions against Iran. He blocked all Iranian property and interests in the US.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan imposed a new import embargo on Iranian goods and services for what he called Iran's "support for international terrorism".

President Bill Clinton prohibited US involvement in petroleum development in Iran in 1995 for what he said was Iran's sponsorship of terrorism and active pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.
 
ASA,

Brothers and sisters this the most hypocritical system in the world!

They (the U.S) requested the IAEA to check if Iran has nuclear weapons and now they won't even go by what the IAEA reports!!

We all know about the "wipe off the map" myth

Iran supplies weapons to Iraq? to Shiites? Since when did the kuffar care about Muslims? They started a fire that they can't end (for their own political reasons). 99% of Americans don't even know the difference between a Shiite or Sunni. Muslims have been living amongst each other as well as Christians and Jews peacefully for thousands of years and now they think the incident ignited

If America supplies Israel weapons why can't Iran supply Iraqis that is if Iran even truly does this?

Last time I checked US of A and many other western countries have nuclear weapons

The US has no sufficient evidence for any of the allegations they are claiming.

Every nation should have nuclear weapons because you never know when your country will be attacked by the US!!

We Muslims need to unite because the kuffar hate to see us this way. Our Muslim countries should put a sanction and boycott US goods/services.

Brothers and sister we have to fight for our God given rights.

May Allah swt punish these hypocrites, aggressors and transgressors.
 

kayleigh

Junior Member
No nation should have nuclear weapons.

The US doesn't care about the Shia because they're Muslims, they care because within the context of the war it's not about religion, it's about politics.

The problem isn't so much that other countries have nuclear weapons, it's that countries they deem "dangerous" have them, and countries who don't fit into their political agenda have them. also, countries who won't sign the NPT and allow inspections, which is highly hypocritical because Israel won't sign the NPT and it's like pulling teeth to have them open up to inspections, and when they do let us in, they control what we see. We don't impose sanctions on them, though. We just throw money at them.

Some of the sanctions are absolutely ridiculous. The havoc wreaked by the sanctions should, in theory, not be as bad as the damage that the regime would do. Even though things aren't exactly good for people in Iran, I think the sanctions could cause more harm to the people than the government could.
 
Top