How come you never reserve criticism when it comes to Assad, and only dish it out to the FSA? People HAVE noticed how nonsensical your posts are; don't you wonder why there is always a comment or two from other people rubbishing your claims, and rarely ever a comment in support of what you're saying.Peace and blessings,
You do not have to keep on telling us that you disagree with me, we've got that. And why do you want me to leave the forums? And why are you saying time and time again that I am for Assad? I am not. I've told you that before, I've told you that Assad and his ilk are bad people but the rebels are an awful lot more evil because Syria is in the process of being destroyed. This is my point of view, you can disagree, but you don't have to make me disappear just for that.
Are you afraid that people browsing the forums know about opposing points of view?! Are you afraid that if you do not intervene people will get lost?
If what I'm posting in the forums is nonsensical, anybody with common sense and some intelligence would notice it, right?
Do you agree with me that everybody here is blessed with intelligence and common sense and that they are adults and free to judge for themselves?
If you do, stop replying in this trolling kind of way. If you have counterarguments come up with them, if you don't then do something else.
Peace and blessings.
Assalam,
The number of persons who agree or disagree with an argument does not tell of its plausibility.
Assad has reacted like any other dictator would have if others try to take his place and that is the reason why the scholars have always said that insurrection is not lawful when the good faction is not strong enough and is unable to organize enough. In Syria's case, and in every other Muslim/Arab country the results are super-obvious. Entire countries reduced to ashes, economies destroyed, more slavery to the IMF and most of all: the human loss, the suffering. Assads made people suffer, they tortured, they killed, they exiled. But the insurrection cost 100 000 dead people at least, and God knows how many injured, raped..
Does it compare to Assad's numbers? No.
Is it boding well for the people of Syria, Muslims or otherwise? No.
Will the next Syrian government be of Sunni nature? No, at best, it will be of democratic nature, which has nothing to do with Sunni Islam.
For me that is more than enough to tell of the success of these insurrections, all of them.
You're telling me to take my posts and go away, I don't know too many words to describe this. but I know for sure it's not some kind of argumentative talk.
This is just a bunch of rebels talking, there's no conspiracy at all.
Assalaam.
To say that democracy is incompatible with Islam is correct, because it takes the rule of Allah out of the equation. It's kufr.Assalam,
The number of persons who agree or disagree with an argument does not tell of its plausibility.
Assad has reacted like any other dictator would have if others try to take his place and that is the reason why the scholars have always said that insurrection is not lawful when the good faction is not strong enough and is unable to organize enough. In Syria's case, and in every other Muslim/Arab country the results are super-obvious. Entire countries reduced to ashes, economies destroyed, more slavery to the IMF and most of all: the human loss, the suffering. Assads made people suffer, they tortured, they killed, they exiled. But the insurrection cost 100 000 dead people at least, and God knows how many injured, raped..
Does it compare to Assad's numbers? No.
Is it boding well for the people of Syria, Muslims or otherwise? No.
Will the next Syrian government be of Sunni nature? No, at best, it will be of democratic nature, which has nothing to do with Sunni Islam.
For me that is more than enough to tell of the success of these insurrections, all of them.
You're telling me to take my posts and go away, I don't know too many words to describe this. but I know for sure it's not some kind of argumentative talk.
This is just a bunch of rebels talking, there's no conspiracy at all.
Assalaam.
"Personally I dont want this war to finish now because I would rather see Asad killing the free armies and the Jihadies rather than they are killing each other."
What kind of human being wishes for a war to be prolonged? Some people here really disgust me.
Calm down. I don't agree with OP, but you're taking it too far. What is meant by free-speech? Islam allows the good words, and forbids the bad ones. For example, it's allowed in the west to call the Prophet a lot of bad things, do you support this kind of free speech? Another note that you need to consider is the fact that "democracy" is a non-islamic word. If Allah willed Democracy in Islam, he would have described it, in the hadith/Quran, but he didn't, are you trying to imply that some ancient greeks knew better than Allah (swt)?I'm done with his nonsense. He's an extremist - he's against free speech, against democracy, believes in ludicrous conspiracy theories, is idiotic enough to ignore thousands of forms of evidence... All these uprisings started because people had no say in how their countries are run, and he claims that democracy and free speech are a bad thing and anti-Islamic?! What about the millions of Muslims on the street who are demanding them? I guess in his eyes they aren't Muslims either.
The irony of the likes of this troglodyte calling ANYONE a takfiri is hilarious!
I would rather see Asad killing the free armies and the Jihadies rather than they are killing each other."Personally I dont want this war to finish now because I would rather see Asad killing the free armies and the Jihadies rather than they are killing each other."
What kind of human being wishes for a war to be prolonged? Some people here really disgust me.
Calm down. I don't agree with OP, but you're taking it too far. What is meant by free-speech? Islam allows the good words, and forbids the bad ones. For example, it's allowed in the west to call the Prophet a lot of bad things, do you support this kind of free speech? Another note that you need to consider is the fact that "democracy" is a non-islamic word. If Allah willed Democracy in Islam, he would have described it, in the hadith/Quran, but he didn't, are you trying to imply that some ancient greeks knew better than Allah (swt)?
And, no, millions of muslims ain't demanding the western type of democracy in Syria. In fact, most of the current rebels want to implement Sharia, and not by "democratic" means. It's a fallacy to think that Allahs rule over earth should be according to peoples desire. It's a flaw in the aqidah.
Just to make it simple,
Most of the free army share Abduhalim 265 thinking and they want a democrocy country and thats why U.S is supporting them. MANY OF THEM STEAL, SMOKE and dont pray much, and they think that the fighters are extremist.
Most of the fighters think that the free army who think like that are Kafirs and they are ready to fight them next.
They are now fighting Asad because it is the same enemy. La Hawla Wala Kowata ILA billah. Then they complain about why Allah is not helping them.
Few from both side are fighting purely for the sake of Allah just to protect the women who are rapped and deadly children.
"So Assad is destroying his whole nation in a huge genocide, yet you WON'T support the people trying to stop it, because their personal habits and philosophy don't fit into your hermetically-sealed world view?"
Yes it is a war and thats what happen in it. They try to destroy each other and the strongest win. This is every where. I have nothing to do with this. My relationship is Islam with Syrians the same as the people in Malasya or U.S or any part of the world so if there motive is Dunia let them deal with it.
The same thing happened in France, Romania, United States...etc I would just defend the women and children and has nothing to do with both parties the Free army or the fighters, though then again there are people from both side are Mashalah but few.