Being reduced to a myth for secularist doesn't change the fact we are in the end days.. And have been for 2000 + years. [/quote
Salam Alaikom
I think we all should stick to the haddith. And stick to verified mayor and minor signs. If anyone of you has memorised them than share.
At this point I wanna tell I read here about a haddith in which was said about a man which will claim to be from Prophet's progneny. I think this event allready happened. The Abu Bakr al Baghdady is claiming it.
Assalam
As sister Cariad said, if you have faith in the Creator, in your religion and the conviction that everything is part of Allah's Divine Plan, nothing is either too fantastic, unbelievable or worth worrying about. The secularist believes in Life before death and that's where it ends. That is their obsession and not ours. The person who believes in Allah has prosperity in salvation in both life before death through belief and satisfaction in the Divine Decree, from within their own lives as well as acceptance of Allah's Justice and the reality today in the wider world as well as entry to the Kingdom of Heaven in the Life after death. So in short we have the best of both worlds. We are in a win win situation no matter how you look at it.
Salam,
Really brother Juwairijya I didnt even saw what syster Carriad was talking about, I just post a thought to enyone having a discussion about this times. And wasnt introduced verry well with way this forum works.
I do really accept what Allah apoints to anybody as the divine decree. I just entered a discussion with a thought and wasnt aware of the topic being discussed.
Allhamdullilah I learned about a belief of secularists.
Assalam
Don't worry brother. I was being general and not referring to anyone or anything in particular. My objection, if it is targeted at anyone, is on the occultists, the secularists, the atheists, the agnostics, the religious internationalists [those who take all religions as correct and treat every religion as their own], and the New World Order strategists [i.e. governments and international organisations].
Don't worry brother. I was being general and not referring to anyone or anything in particular. My objection, if it is targeted at anyone, is on the occultists, the secularists, the atheists, the agnostics, the religious internationalists [those who take all religions as correct and treat every religion as their own], and the New World Order strategists [i.e. governments and international organisations].
The quotation below is not something to take too seriously, but it has some themes which have already started and not hard to believe. The author is someone who has spent 27 years researching it. While some of what he says is sound, we can disagree on some issues. The points below are not about prevalence, but about as it suggests, an 'order' and how it is or is intended to suppress traditional structures such as 'belief in religion', 'the conventional family' etc.
"The New World Order will include changes in:
the family:
homosexual marriages will be legalized;
parents will not be allowed to raise their
children (the state will
all women will be employed by the state and not allowed to
be "homemakers";
divorce will become exceedingly
easy and monogynous marriage
will be slowly phased out;
the workplace: the government will become the owner of
all of the factors of production;
the private ownership of property will be outlawed;
religion: religion will be outlawed and believers will be either eliminated or imprisoned;
there will be a new religion:
the worship of man and his mind; all will believe in the new religion;" (Source: New World Order by A. Ralph Epperson)
Personal Comment: As you can see from the list, one of the greatest assaults is on 'the family'. Perhaps if the family is destroyed, the belief is the state will be the new authority figure; the only source of education, upliftment, role model and moral code of guidance and life or goal motivation is the State itself.
The quotation below is not something to take too seriously, but it has some themes which have already started and not hard to believe. The author is someone who has spent 27 years researching it. While some of what he says is sound, we can disagree on some issues. The points below are not about prevalence, but about as it suggests, an 'order' and how it is or is intended to suppress traditional structures such as 'belief in religion', 'the conventional family' etc.
"The New World Order will include changes in:
the family:
homosexual marriages will be legalized;
parents will not be allowed to raise their
children (the state will
all women will be employed by the state and not allowed to
be "homemakers";
divorce will become exceedingly
easy and monogynous marriage
will be slowly phased out;
the workplace: the government will become the owner of
all of the factors of production;
the private ownership of property will be outlawed;
religion: religion will be outlawed and believers will be either eliminated or imprisoned;
there will be a new religion:
the worship of man and his mind; all will believe in the new religion;" (Source: New World Order by A. Ralph Epperson)
Personal Comment: As you can see from the list, one of the greatest assaults is on 'the family'. Perhaps if the family is destroyed, the belief is the state will be the new authority figure; the only source of education, upliftment, role model and moral code of guidance and life or goal motivation is
It sounds like the Novel "nineteen eighty four" By George Orwell. Or "Brave New World" by Adlous Huxley.The quotation below is not something to take too seriously, but it has some themes which have already started and not hard to believe. The author is someone who has spent 27 years researching it. While some of what he says is sound, we can disagree on some issues. The points below are not about prevalence, but about as it suggests, an 'order' and how it is or is intended to suppress traditional structures such as 'belief in religion', 'the conventional family' etc.
"The New World Order will include changes in:
the family:
homosexual marriages will be legalized;
parents will not be allowed to raise their
children (the state will
all women will be employed by the state and not allowed to
be "homemakers";
divorce will become exceedingly
easy and monogynous marriage
will be slowly phased out;
the workplace: the government will become the owner of
all of the factors of production;
the private ownership of property will be outlawed;
religion: religion will be outlawed and believers will be either eliminated or imprisoned;
there will be a new religion:
the worship of man and his mind; all will believe in the new religion;" (Source: New World Order by A. Ralph Epperson)
Personal Comment: As you can see from the list, one of the greatest assaults is on 'the family'. Perhaps if the family is destroyed, the belief is the state will be the new authority figure; the only source of education, upliftment, role model and moral code of guidance and life or goal motivation is the State itself.
Masons I think maybe too near to Satan.I thought I might add something about Albert Pike, who was mentioned earlier by another poster, as an influential mason.
Albert Pike, to the masons, is a guru, a founding father and a master, a person who has reached the highest point of perfection in his field and excels others due to his passion for masonry.
"The Masonic writer, Albert Pike, placed the Masonic order into the discussion, when he wrote this in his book MORALS AND DOGMA:
'It is not true to say that 'one man, however little, must not be sacrificed to another, however great, to a majority or to all men.'
That is not only a fallacy, but a most dangerous one.
Often one man and many men must be sacrificed, in the ordinary sense of the term, to the interest of the many.
... the interest and even the life of one man must often be sacrificed to the interest and welfare of his country."
(Source: New World Order by A. Ralph Epperson, P 37)
It sounds like the Novel "nineteen eighty four" By George Orwell. Or "Brave New World" by Adlous Huxley.
Of course they are anti religion. They are against God.. If they are against God they are players for the other side.Huxley is one of the people I quoted and both Orwell and HG Wells were among those who spoke about the NWO and the occult as well. If you remember Orwell's 1938 live fictional radio broadcast led to thousands of Americans to believe the aliens had just landed.
As to being Satan or from Satan, I can't say, but the NWO is definitely anti religion and if I might add very anti Christianity as well. I won't repeat some of their statements in part because of the highly explicit verbal expressions of hatred spoken and written against Christians in general. I can understand someone blaming religion for the world's faults, but to speak so harshly and to use such strong language is uncalled for against any religion.