The bible
With respect sir your post was so long winded without any breaks that I lost track in what you are trying to say. Your 1st paragraph comprised entirely of one sentence. So i cannot really comment. But i will try and answer those points which make some sort sense.
Books are not printed to be memorised. Even if they were, does that make those people 'scholars'? books are printed to learn from.Period. Im here to learn - not marvel at people who can memorise. Apart from that I don't really know what you are talking about.
I'm not here to do missionary work. Is that a crime?
I'm here to learn and see how Islam regards the corruption of the scriptures. That's the book I follow. I'm here to try and find out what I'm missing spiritually.I'm here to learn what Islam can offer what the followers of the scriptures can't. All i can see at this point in time is the deep division between the 2 faiths.
In your last paragraph you mention something about the scriptures in Greek. Am I correct in saying that because they were written in Greek, that means the new testament is corrupt? I need your help here as I really cannot comment as I don't really know what your point is. Thank you
Before you go off in a tangent, Your post would make better sense if you reproduced it in point form. It would have been great if you had answered my questions briefly to the point just like your compatriot did.do not even try we know all your games and tactics the
Quran is less intressted in presenting the mythological and legendary aspect of the life of the prophets but concentrates more objectivly on the essence of the Message as first and main prerogative to be focused on it is the message that is important ,to worship one god without partners and to do good deeds..etc and please go verify some nummbers there because no book in the world is more read than the holy Quran hundred of thousands of muslims know it by heart from very young age no book has been translated so often no book has being preserved in it`s original form this way in the whole history of humanity so please give me a break ever heard of something similar about the bibles which bible anyways the protestants, catholics,jehovas,the apocryphas, which manuscripts and which version start by telling us what version!because they differ from one another does a book called bible even exist in this context at least one that is agreed upon and used by all no!!!!!!!!!!! go debate with hindous or buddhists theologicaly i think they are closer to you they believe in many gods eventough their books tell them not to they make images of god eventough their holy books tell them not too they think god transforms himself into his creation eventough their books tell them not too pantheism)...etc this is not a place to do missionary work it is a place to learn about islam i do not even believe you are christian after all this time i think you have something to do with bohemian grove or something..it is getting too phony i can`t stand people that go against logic and good sense and then still insist without producing any proof!
The Quran is the Arabic text only!!!!!!!!!! the arabic text is the word of god the translation is a choice of word that may differ from translator to translator but it doesn`t change to a point where you find contradiction of enormous proportion like in the bibles and you always have the original just in case! the oldest manuscripts of the new testament are only preserved in greek am asking did jesus peace be upon him speak greek to his deciples did they write them in greek!!!!!!!!!!!!!!or is it somebody else that wrote them centuries after and how come they contradict each other so much..and i can go on and on Sir it is not worth it trust me it is like you are knocking your head against the wall. .......... am bored with this either a religion can justify itself as such or not there is no alternative to that so if you pretend something produce your proof or stay quite that is the least you can do!
With respect sir your post was so long winded without any breaks that I lost track in what you are trying to say. Your 1st paragraph comprised entirely of one sentence. So i cannot really comment. But i will try and answer those points which make some sort sense.
Books are not printed to be memorised. Even if they were, does that make those people 'scholars'? books are printed to learn from.Period. Im here to learn - not marvel at people who can memorise. Apart from that I don't really know what you are talking about.
I'm not here to do missionary work. Is that a crime?
I'm here to learn and see how Islam regards the corruption of the scriptures. That's the book I follow. I'm here to try and find out what I'm missing spiritually.I'm here to learn what Islam can offer what the followers of the scriptures can't. All i can see at this point in time is the deep division between the 2 faiths.
In your last paragraph you mention something about the scriptures in Greek. Am I correct in saying that because they were written in Greek, that means the new testament is corrupt? I need your help here as I really cannot comment as I don't really know what your point is. Thank you