.I have stormed the doors of all palaces akhi am not answerable to anybody and I bow down to Allah swt alone as he was the only one to be there for me when I needed,let alone giving my anger or sadness to a simple mortal.
Who is saying anything about taking things personal or not... fact check you did not provide evidence and that is what it is all about,nothing more. You even said for example that the Rule of Law and the Equality before the law which I and others have explained over and over again is not Islamic!With historical example we gave you evidence from the Quraan ,from the Sunnah,Yet you did not correct yourself afterwards!
How do you want anybody to wast his time discussing with you when you alienate yourself from very basic principles that a school child would comprehend, just for the sake of refuting and thus appearing pious in front of others.People have their lives as much as you do akhi,we can not be on TTI 24 hours and go through every mistake you made because they are nummerous...
You change the subject by clinging unto every opportunity to disqualify your interlocutor through the alibi of ignorance with the Dogmatic stance of genetic fallacy and thus think to buy your way out in this fashion.Any discerning and god fearing person would call it way of not responsibly facing your own contradictions and simple logic.
.You have not provided a single evidence form the Quraan and the Sunnah.
And the fatwas that you probably mistake with revelation are not void of errors in this case they are very flawed and out of touch with reality.The only logic explication is that they are influenced by certain powers who wanna keep the status quo because of Geo-Strategical and internal interests . The reasoning behind is flawed and not void of subjectivity ,that's all.
You can even use fatwas to justify the presence of Kuffar armies in Muslim lands isn't it!
And most of all you did not answer the questions.
Wassalaam
Let me clarify a few things first, i rejected the idea that the five basic principles of democracy were perfectly compatible with islam. The principles were rule of law, equality, separation of powers,accountability and universal suffrage.
You have not provided a single evidence form the Quraan and the Sunnah
I can easily prove to you that i did and you are clearly ignoring it
"They(jews and christians) took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah (by obeying them in things which they made lawful or unlawful according to their own desires without being ordered by Allah) and they (they also took as their lord) Messiah, son of Maryam (mary) while they (jews and christians) were commanded (in the torah and gospel) to worship one Ilah (god i.e, Allah), La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He). Praise and Glory is to Him (far above is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him)." {Q 9:31}.
Once while Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) was reciting the above verse 'Adl bin Hatim said, "O Allah's Prophet! They do not worship them (rabbi and monks)." Allah's Messenger said, "They certainly do. They ( i.e rabbis and monks) made legal things illegal, and illegal things legal and they ( jews and christians) followed them; and by doing so they really worshiped them."
(Narrated by Ahmad, At Tirmidhi and Ibn Jarir). (Tafsir At-Tabari, Vol.10, Page No. 114)
Ok lets expand on the above evidence.
We can clearly see the comparison between what the jews and christians were doing then and what they are doing now?? So what is the comparison?
They are taking mere humans as lords ,by obeying them in things which they made lawful or unlawful according to their own desires without being ordered by Allah which is what some people are doing in some muslims countries that are democratic!!!!. What do you call this?? is this not a clear evidence against it?
Also since you say the basic principles are the same then certainly they must bear resemblence to each other eg
The rule of law in both America and Saudi arabia should be the same, but is it the same??. Since one is democratic and the other an islamic state, then they must perfectly fit together just like you said, but are they??
And the fatwas that you probably mistake with revelation are not void of errors in this case they are very flawed and out of touch with reality.The only logic explication is that they are influenced by certain powers who wanna keep the status quo because of Geo-Strategical and internal interests . The reasoning behind is flawed and not void of subjectivity ,that's all.
So what you are basically saying is that they are wrong on this issue even though they have spent their entire life learning the deen and dedicated themselves with knoweledge
Allaah - the Most High - said:
"Say: Are they equal, those who have knowledge and those who do not? But only the men of understanding will take admonition." [Soorah Zumar 39:9].
"Allaah will raise up in degrees those of you who believe and those who have been granted knowledge." [Soorah al-Mujaadalah 58:11].
"It is only those who possess knowledge amongst His slaves that fear Allaah" [Soorah Faatir 35:28]. "Indeed those who believe and do righteous actions, they are the best of creatures ... This is for those who fear their Lord." [Soorah al-Bayyinah 98:7-8].
Ibn Jamaa'ah, rahimahullaah, said:
"So Allaah decreed in these two Verses that the scholars are those who most fear Allaah, and that those who fear Allaah are the best of creatures. The consequence of this is that the scholars are therefore the best of creatures."
The Prophet sallallaahu 'alalyhi wa sallam said:
"The superiority of the scholar over the worshipper is like that of the full moon on a clear night over the rest of the stars. Indeed the scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets and the Prophets do not leave behind them the deenaar nor the dirham as inheritance, they leave only knowledge behind as inheritance. So whosoever aquires it, aquires a huge fortune." [1] Reported by Abu Dawood, At-Tirmidhee and Ibn Hibbaan, and this is the wording found in his collection, in abridged form. Al-Bukhaaree mentioned in his Saheeh Collection in his Book of Knowledge, Chapter: Knowledge precedes Speech and Action, the part from it: “The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets.”
You can even use fatwas to justify the presence of Kuffar armies in Muslim lands isn't it!
Ukhti i think i'll end it here and may Allah swt guide you