You may find some of the answer here.
:salam2:
I understand the anger people have against Pakistan and/or Pakistani army. But the things are much more complicated than what they appear. It needs a little bit of more understanding.
I am writing this article about the creation of Pakistan based on my study and my analysis.
It is in two parts. I have completed the Part 1 which I am posting here, and I am working on the Part 2.
Thanks in advance for reading.
Who participated in creating Pakistan.
Part I.
It is a common belief that Mohammad Ali Jinnah was the only founder of Pakistan. Well... This may not be 100% true, and my analysis will show you that there are other quite significant "co-founders" of Pakistan too.
Hindu participation in creating Pakistan:
I will start this analysis with the term "Hindu". This word was coined by Muslims when they came to India and they started calling all locals as Hindu from the Arabic word Hind for the land of sub-continent, it was like Englishman calling every native people "Indians". With this one word the Muslims united all the local pagans living in the Indian sub-continent as one community or one entity. Before that they used to be Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras or Chandalas (Untouchables) etc.
Now coming to the early 20th century, British realized in the beginning of the 20th century that they will not be able to rule over India forever, so they needed a transition plan. But transition to whom? They took India from Muslims but there is no way they were going to give the whole India back to the Muslims. The only groups they trusted and could depend on were these Upper-Casts (Hindus), but the Upper Casts were a very small minority in India.
How could they transfer power to such a small minority which was less than 5% of the total population?
Tell me (you the reader)... how would you have done it if this task was assigned to you?
Well... the plan they came up with was a multi-fold and multi-step plan, and a very clever one. First start by dividing the population in two groups by using violence, then, partition the country, then... Well, we will talk about it later in the article.
To accomplish the first task of violence against Muslims, the Upper Cast engineered movements like the Shuddhi Movement and then launched hundreds of riots in 1920's and 1930's against Muslims and they termed those riots as "Hindu-Muslim" riot. It was a stupid mistake that we Muslims also called them Hindu-Muslim riots, instead of calling them what they were, the "Upper Cast-Muslim riots". By doing that we Muslims already gave away a large percentage of Indian population (the Lower Cast) into the command and control of these clever Upper Cast leaders, who accepted this gift without even saying Thank You. If Muslims have called it a "Brahmin-Muslim" riot or "Upper Cast-Muslim" riot then just by using this nomenclature we could have kept a sympathetic and friendly population of Lower Cast Indians, because we Muslims never had any problems or issues with the Lower Cast people. But the Upper Cast used the term Hindu mercilessly and became successful in bringing the lower cast people behind them.
After this the Upper Cast became the default "representatives" and "leaders" of all Hindus including the Lower Cast. They also achieved the second most important purpose of these riots… Implant the idea in Muslims mind that they cannot live peacefully with Hindus any more in a united India. They were deliberately sowing the seeds of partition of India.
So, after two decades of killings and lootings by the Upper Cast incited "Hindu" mobs, Muslims were forced to find an alternative to live peacefully by demanding a separate state for themselves. What a clever plan it was, it forced the Muslims of India to work hard to actually achieve the goal of the Upper Casts. Quide-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah who was once a champion of Hindu Muslim unity was so disgusted and disappointed by these people's behavior that he found no other alternative except to demand a separate state for Muslims. And during all these struggles he always kept the option open for Muslims to live in a united India. But Nehru and Indian National Congress (which was dominated by the Upper Cast) stayed on their course and refused to provide any opportunity to Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Indian Muslims to back out from their demand of a separate state, thus succeeding in creating Pakistan. Jaswant Singh is not just wrong, he is untruthful when he says in his book that Nehru and other congressional leaders were "lacking realism and had no foresight, purpose or will". On the contrary these guys knew exactly what they were doing and they succeeded in accomplishing what they planned. You see, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and All India Muslim League accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan which provided federal structure for a United India with protections for minorities, but Nehru and Congress cold-bloodedly rejected it because they were not interested in a United India anymore.
Originally it was Choudhary Rahmat Ali who coined the name "Pakistan" for a Muslim homeland in North-Western part of India, he also named "Bang-i-Islam" for a Muslim homeland in the Bengal, and "Usmanistan" for a Muslim homeland in the Deccan. But in the Lahore Resolution of 1940 the name Pakistan was not mentioned. Knowing that the nomenclature was very important, just as the term "Hindu" given by Muslims to the locals of India helped Upper Cast to assemble all Hindus, so the Upper Cast knew the impact of a "name", because it helps make an idea to come alive. In their mind the Muslim masses might not be as motivated to give life for implementing a ‘resolution’, as they would be for a country called Pakistan. Till 1942 the All India Muslim League leadership had not used the term Pakistan, but when the two Hindu communal newspapers sarcastically mentioned that the Lahore Resolution was a resolution for the creation of Pakistan and the movement by the All India Muslim League was a movement for Pakistan, the Quaid-i-Azam accepted it. He declared that if they called it a Pakistan movement, then let it be so. I am not saying that if those Hindu newspapers would not have called it a "Pakistan movement" then eventually it would not have become a movement for Pakistan and Muslims would not have given their lives for it, but my point is that the Upper Cast used all kinds of prompting and nudging and pushing and did whatever they could to help create Pakistan while at the same time acted as if they were against it.
Now how the creation of Pakistan benefit the Upper Cast?
The answer is in the answer of the question asked earlier: "How a small minority of Upper Cast which was less than 5% of the total population can get control of the whole sub-continent?"
And the answer is…
Create separate states for Muslims.
Riots made 5% population of Upper Cast the leader of nearly 55% population of all Hindus, and the creation of Pakistan made them ruler of over 70% population of the undivided British India. Those Muslims who stayed in India were ironically blamed and punished for creating Pakistan and were openly discriminated against in every field. Riots engineered after the partition had devastated Muslims in India and kept them poor and helpless. This helped the Upper Cast in consolidating their position in power. In every branch of government they became the decision maker and controlled all the policy matters even when they were still a small minority in the divided India.
How the united India could have hurt the Upper Cast?
If the Upper Cast had not played the "Hindu-Muslim riot card" and not created Pakistan then, Muslims who were nearly 40% of the total Indian population and who had ruled India for over a thousand years could have easily formed a government. It is obvious that everyone would prefer to make alliance with 40% than rather with 5%. Muslims could have easily made alliance with the lower cast and ruled over India forever. Then Muslims would be dominating in the united India's government and in all other fields and the Upper Cast would have got nothing. All policy matters whether domestic or foreign would have been decided by the Muslims.
So you have to admit that the Upper Cast were extremely successful in adopting and executing the "Hindu-Muslim riot" plan and the "divide India" plan and they gained maximum benefit from these plans, and they are where they are today because of these two very cleverly designed and executed plans.
British participation in creating Pakistan:
British realized early on that they will not be able to rule over India for a very long time, sooner or later they will have to leave, but who will they give the power to when they leave? They took power from Muslims but they were never going to give back power to the Muslims or even allowing a situation in which Muslims could gain power later on. Therefore, even if they handed over power to say Indian National Congress, then, what guarantee was there that Muslims will not come to power later on by making alliances with other communities. This door needed to be shut, so India had to be divided. An additional short-term benefit to divide India was that the two created countries will fight with one another which will keep sub-continent week and by default Britain stronger. But in my opinion the main reason for Britain to divide India was to make sure that the main power goes and remains into the hands of the Upper Cast Hindus, and Muslims should never come close to it.
Reasons for British participation in creating Pakistan:
Here I will use terms not commonly used in articles. But these things are facts and they exist, also remember that early 20th century was the time just after the Zionists appeared on earth.
After British captured India in 1857 the Jews realized that now the Muslims are on their way out, Europeans have not just taken over control of the new world i.e. Americas, Australia etc, but now they are taking control of the old world too, and soon they will take over control of the whole world. So they decided to make alliance with them, but alliance with whom... Pope? Britain? America? Who? Well they decided to make alliance with the most powerful yet hidden power in the west. The Freemasons ! After their deal with the Freemasons all the restrictions on Jews were lifted, the ceilings were removed and then the newly created Jewish Zionists could go as high as they wanted and in any business they wished. For example you see, today RothsChild of London controls not just the US Federal Reserve but monetary systems of nearly all the countries of the world and nobody makes a sound. On the other hand the west could not tolerate the rise of BCCI and decapitated it just after the end of cold war when BCCI lost its usefulness for CIA, and primarily because it was owned by Muslims.
In the beginning of 20th century a similar deal was made with the Upper Cast and plans were made to make them the rulers of the sub-continent. To accomplish this, things were put into motion to carve out a separate state for Muslims which will decimate the political power of the leftover Muslims in India, their huge population would be marginalized and would mean nothing in the divided India. At the same time the new Muslim country will be weakened systematically with the help of Freemasonry powers, and then it will be divided, and then sub-divided and weakened some more and then eventually rendered useless by becoming a bunch of colonies of India. Thus the huge Muslims population of India which could have ruled India would be divided into pieces and will have little or no political power over anything. After that the Upper Cast will not only rule supreme over the whole sub-continent but their influence will spread beyond this region, and they will play their vital role in the establishment of the New World Order. So this was not just a British plan but it also had the blessings of the international Freemasonry.
How this plan has worked so far?
If you look at the sub-continent today the things are going exactly as they were planned. East Pakistan has already become BanglaDesh blocking Bengali Muslims from playing any significant role in the world or even in regional power politics. The leftover Pakistan has been weakened by installing dictators and corrupt politicians and when possible by using sanctions and trade barriers. Today there is an all out attack on Pakistan by using drones and sending RAW trained PTT terrorists and Blackwater/Xe mercenaries. While India has been protected and peace in India is not supposed to be disturbed, Pakistan has been made into an open game. India can send as many terrorists from US controlled Afghanistan as they wish, explode as many bombs, kill as many people as they possibly can, with impunity. Nuclear deal for India while K-L Bill for Pakistan are clear evidence that the plan for which India was divided is on its tracks and is going full speed ahead.
There are hundreds of examples which I can present here which will clearly show how America (a known Freemasonry power) has played its role in attempting to destroy Pakistan. Things that doesn't make sense has happened and are still happening. During Cuban missile crisis when Pakistan was one of the first country to be attacked by USSR because Pakistan had given a base to US near Peshawar, most of the northwest Pakistan would have evaporated and had become inhabitable if USSR had launched nuclear missile strikes on that part of Pakistan where the US base was. But what the US did in return... conspiracy and treachery! From Agartala conspiracy case, to stopping Pakistan from taking over Kashmir during India-China war, to putting sanctions when Pakistan needed the help most. These are the things the US did to Pakistan, they knew that India was making nuclear bomb but made no noise, but then after Indian nuclear test when Pakistan wanted nuclear bomb only to protect itself, look what they did and what they are still doing to Pakistan who they claim is their very close ally, a "Non-NATO Ally". I can go on and on and on, I can even write a book about American treachery against Pakistan. But here I just wanted to present a brief picture of how the Freemasonry powers have attempted to destroy Pakistan and help India, for the reasons I have stated above.
Now, by destroying Pakistan I am not saying that the Upper Cast and their allies want India to takeover Pakistan and make it an integral part of India. NO... they do not want this to happen, because if Pakistan and BanglaDesh get absorbed in India, and India becomes the "Akhand Bharat", then this will only hurt the Upper Cast. Because then it will be the same old situation all over again, Muslims will become the biggest voting block and they could eventually take over the power. So how could they allow this to happen. Therefore no matter how much propaganda the Upper Cast leaders make about the Akhand Bharat they are not interested in it at all. Even if the Muslims of Pakistan and BanglaDesh beg to become part of India, the Upper Cast leadership will not allow it to happen. They will find reasons and create means to stop it from happening, just like they always come-up with reasons and delaying tactics when they do the so-called "dialogue" with Pakistan. Pakistan and India have been doing these dialogues for decades, have these talks ever taken us anywhere? No! So, Akhand Bharat is also just a propaganda to fool the public, while actually they want to keep India divided and Muslims to be more divided into several Indian (Upper Cast) controlled satellite states.
Part II.
Who else participated in creating Pakistan:
After reading all this, one could argue why Muslims would even want a separate country for themselves. Well, in my opinion the answer is simple: Because this was also the will of Allah (SWT). And whatever Allah wills, happens.
Amazingly Pakistan came into existence on the midnight (morning) of 27th of Ramadan, right during the Night of Power (Lailatul Qadr), millions of Muslims gave their lives to create this country. So Pakistan is no ordinary country, it has a destiny to fulfill, that is why it was created.
Allah says in the Quran "they planned and Allah planned, and Allah is the best of planner". As I will go along I will try to explain how this verse of Quran fits with the creation of Pakistan.
..... continued .....