daywalker
Junior Member
you mean Quran and sunnah is one time right and another time wrong?if they back up from qur'an and sunnah it's right but not always..
you mean Quran and sunnah is one time right and another time wrong?if they back up from qur'an and sunnah it's right but not always..
:salam2::salam2:
How do you know one imam is right and another imam is wrong? dont tell me, you learned from sh.munajjid who said this imam is right and that imam is wrong! if so you aren´t following any imam but only sh.munajjid.
what is the criteria of your judging one is right and another one is wrong? Not everything glance, are Gold. and the word "Seem" is also used as synonym of guess or assuming. so i hope you dont practise the religion by guessing or assuming.
Nope i meant everytime you read a book from a madhab they quote verses and interpret it but are we sure if they interpret it correctly?you mean Quran and sunnah is one time right and another time wrong?
what do i need to know to say this interpratation is right or wrong? guessing or assuming? or seems nice or sounds good? is this the way of saying this interpratation is correct or wrong?Nope i meant everytime you read a book from a madhab they quote verses and interpret it but are we sure if they interpret it correctly?
thats what i meant
you mean, you self have knowledge of Usool hadith, Usool fiqh, nasikh -mansookh knowledge? mashallah, its nice to know we have a scholar on our board.I hope im not guessing too
It's better if you answer that Q!what do i need to know to say this interpratation is right or wrong? guessing or assuming? or seems nice or sounds good? is this the way of saying this interpratation is correct or wrong?
Akhi the evidence you have brought is WEak according to muhaddith ibn hajar(rh) but sahih according to sh.albani its sahih. so what to do now? follow a sahih hadith or a weak hadith? follow ibn hajar or follow sh.albani?It's better if you answer that Q!
i read a book about salah and it was great because of all the evidences.
Nope i saw i hope im not guessing whats right and whats wrongyou mean, you self have knowledge of Usool hadith, Usool fiqh, nasikh -mansookh knowledge? mashallah, its nice to know we have a scholar on our board.
sorry brother my english is poor please elaborate your sentence inshallah.Nope i saw i hope im not guessing whats right and whats wrong
dont have knowledge abt those things
follow a sahih hadith of course..Akhi the evidence you have brought is WEak according to muhaddith ibn hajar(rh) but sahih according to sh.albani its sahih. so what to do now? follow a sahih hadith or a weak hadith? follow ibn hajar or follow sh.albani?
sahih according to which muhaddith?follow a sahih hadith of course..
how do you know their interpratation is right or wrong if you dont know usool hadith as admitted by you?about those scholars insh'Allah try to read their interpretation..
yepwell isnt he a shafi'i?
its not weak because Tirmidhi and Abu Dawud claimed it to be authentic as the book says soAkhi the evidence you have brought is WEak according to muhaddith ibn hajar(rh) but sahih according to sh.albani its sahih. so what to do now? follow a sahih hadith or a weak hadith? follow ibn hajar or follow sh.albani?
how do you know tirmidhi or abu dawud was right or wrong?its not weak because Tirmidhi and Abu Dawud claimed it to be authentic as the book says so
You are only trying to play with my mind...how do you know tirmidhi or abu dawud was right or wrong?
you are blindly following the claim of tirmidhi and abu dawud.
OK .......
1000 can say something, but you are blind following their claim! as you haven´t study Usool hadith, you are following their claim blindly! how do you know 1000 are right but other 2 are wrong? are you judging a hadith by majority and minority? Truth isn´t depended upon majority or monirity. Islam is the Truth, yet its minority in the world.You are only trying to play with my mind...
its not only them but others as well that said its authentic
and this is called blind following, trusting something without knowing the evidence. :astag:but the book only says ''with others as well'' without saying the names.
i dont understand you is it blind following when i see at others claims?1000 can say something, but you are blind following their claim! as you haven´t study Usool hadith, you are following their claim blindly! how do you know 1000 are right but other 2 are wrong? are you judging a hadith by majority and minority? Truth isn´t depended upon majority or monirity. Islam is the Truth, yet its minority in the world.
and this is called blind following, trusting something without knowing the evidence. :astag:
:salam2::salam2:
If you read Islamqa, they will say what is strong opinion according to sh.munajjid. So you are following madhab of sh.munajjid.
you said the book says there are other, but dind´t mention. so you are blind following the claim of the booki dont understand you is it blind following when i see at others claims?
If you dont know usool hadith, how do you know abu dawud and tirmidhi were right?lol what trusting? who said i trust
and this books contains weak hadith and other things.abu dawud and tirmidhi are great they wrote it in the books sunan tirmidhi/Abu Dawud