uniqueskates
Rabbe Zidni Illma
There goes my thread into the bin. *Sad* 
He may be serious sister, but he is still wrong.
The science is absolutely clear that man has evolved. There is absolutely no scientific evidence to refute it. It is a wonderful subject to look into, because it shows the amazing complexity of Allah's (swt) design. That is reason alone that muslims should properly study the subject because it is evidence of God's greatness.
The human appendix is an example of an evolutionary hang-over. It has no function whatsoever. It used to have a function when we were a far more primitive species because we used to eat raw meat then - and that's what the appendix allowed us to process - raw meat. But we do not require that now so it's function has been deselected by natural selection, yet the appendix itself remains.
Like I said, there is no contradiction between evolution and Islam. My stepdad is a university lecturer in the biological sciences and he knows that evolution is fact, but he is still a practicing muslim who prays 5 times a day. I am a self-confessed geek about many things, but that's because I've been taught by the best....the same person who led me to Islam.
I very much appreciate that. JazaakAllahu khayraa.I must be equally as honest, sister.
By the way, the reason that I am on the verge of leaving was because I was called either "a non-muslim troll" or "a muslim who hasn't submitted to Allah (swt)". Both of those things are very hurtful - I'm not even sure which of them is the most hurtful. To revert to Islam and do all of the things I have in the last 8 months....and then have that said to you....is really like a knife through the heart.
I have explained myself very clearly on that point.
I don't think I've come across a more ignorant group of people. It's been an experience.....which I hope not to repeat.
But on the other hand, thanks....because you've helped me see what "TTI" really is......
And I shall bid you farewell......
Yep. We agree on that.Exactly. So there is no contradiction there, which we agree.
Not bad. You've put a lot of thought into it. However, I'll be forming my opinion on your theory of evolution with caution. It's matter of the deen. I prefer to being very cautious as this is what the case of my eternal life depends on. I would like to see the people of knowledge have a discussion on it. You can actually help me since I'll be a lil caught up soon. I'll PM you in case you want to.I think I can use an example from cosmology to explain. For example, we know for a fact that the universe is still expanding; so therefore creation is still going on. We also know that the Earth is billions of years old and that the universe is many more billions of years old. That period of time, to us, seems an eternity, but to Allah (swt) it is nothing. So, of course Allah had to form us directly from the clay (and you are right about the clay being demonstrated in the Miller-Urey experiment).
But, evolution does take millions/billions of years depending on what is going on. By "direct" I don't think that has to mean in an instant. Certainly it may be an instant to Allah, but not an instant to us (the same with the universe, etc). I don't think it is any contradiction to say that Allah formed life gradually. If we were to make a statute of someone from clay ourselves, we would have to start somewhere and progress until we finished. That would take time. But of course, we know what a person looks like, so we would just be copying. That wasn't the case with Allah; he formed us as he willed, and I don't see why that wasn't by a gradual process. I don't see that the Quran rejects that.
For example, what does "direct" mean? And does it mean "direct" by our understanding of the word, or according to Allah's power? "Direct" to Allah may mean billions of years to us.
It's not clear for me. I get you, I get the theory, but like I said, for me it explains the mass not the being itself. After that I do agree with your paragraph above. Science does increases one's awe and admiration of Allah and His power.Nonetheless, the science on the matter is absolutely clear. Humans have evolved. So that is clearly the way Allah formed us. I don't believe this contradicts the Quran, and I don't believe it is insulting to Allah. If anything, evolution proves beyond any doubt how amazing our creator is. That is something I believe we should marvel at. Every time I learn something from science, it just makes me increase in my faith, because I know that Allah is even greater and more amazing than I knew the day before, and even greater and amazing than I knew the day before that, and so on. For me, that is marvelous!
You are right about life not being constructed in a laboratory, though I scientist did in the last few years construct a primitive cell. That isn't contradicting the Quran either. Because what we do know for sure from that experiment is that there had to be a creator, because it didn't just happen on its own. That's proof Allah exists and that he controls the formation of all life.
Scientists might in time be able to construct life in the laboratory, but wouldn't be contradictory either. All that would prove is that intelligent life is definitely required to forge together Allah's building blocks of life into life. None of that came about by itself or could be made into life itself...so it only supports our beliefs that there is a creator who created us.
Only those who don't want to take Qur'an as the final revelation, don't agree with this.People may not agree with this...but I honestly think that science supports what the Quran says. If you think about it, science can't not support the Quran!
Wa 'alaikumassalam warahmatullah,
I hope u got the answers to your questions insha'Allah @uniquestates bro...please let us know if there's anything confusing insha'Allah.
People may say things about evolution or Darwinian evolution and I am not sure as I haven't studied evolution in detail,but there is not a single shred of doubt that there is a designer behind the universe and human beings,which is clearly evident from the way things exist around us.In brief,enough for a believer are ayaats,outside signs are need for a bit covered fitrah.
aslam o aliakum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuhu,
Bhai something i was listening to today i got reminded from ur conversation an american doctorp yes u can be education and not believe in evolution) he mentions alot while explaining human physiology how he doesn't believe in evolution and how it couldn't be but does say that natural selection exist thou. Anyways he was mentioning something like, there is no way, its impossible someone so unique and complicated like me (human) can come to existence just randomly
lol bunch of hydrogen ions smashing into each other, making helium blah blah Lol
education doesn't equal agnostic or atheist approach
it makes u know Allah (swt) creation better
![]()
Wa 'alaikumassalam warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu,
Indeed brother there are many contradictions even amongst scientist over issues ,I asked our professor a question,whether the thing is that way or are we assuming it,lol you should have been there bhai to see that how he opened the face of how people theorise things just sometimes to save their faces,when there is no way to find out exactly what happened and how,it's almost like ilmul kalamin the conference when they dont have any explanation,thus so far my lol@hydrogens smashing into each other..
Science can be cold and calculated yeah,how can an element which in itself in the last part of analysis comes out to be a part of the equation it is trying to solve,solve the equation?
There is one known cause for the origin of information and that cause is intelligence, whether its an inscription, a section of text in the book or a software, if you have information and trace it back to its source u have intelligence, therefor, when you find information inscribed along the backbone of the DNA molecule in a cell, the most rational inference, based on repeated experience is that an intelligence of some kind played a role in the origin of that information.
if we are finding information inside every cell and every living creature, could that not be in a sense the signature of a creator.
today scientist pointing more directly and powerfully towards a creator than any other time in the history of the world.
There goes my thread into the bin. *Sad*![]()
Critical thought is important for Muslims, and indeed all mankind. Allāh discourages ignorance, and rewards those who thrive for knowledge. Never be afraid to challenge your beliefs. The truth can never be faulted. The testing of principles can only strengthen them, if they are indeed correct. Scotty is a great example of critical thought. A true academic. I concur with the views he has expressed. I must however, offer a correction in regards to the human appendix. The human appendix has long been understood to hold no function, and simply be an evolutionary throwback. Whilst there are plenty of good examples of evolutionary throwbacks (i.e. the vestigial tail, which Scotty also referenced), the truth of the human appendix (which was only discovered and confirmed in recent years) is as follows:
[This has been taken from The Scientific American publication.]
Question: What is the function of the human appendix? Did it once have a purpose that has since been lost?
Loren G. Martin, professor of physiology at Oklahoma State University, replies:
"For years, the appendix was credited with very little physiological function. We now know, however, that the appendix serves an important role in the fetus and in young adults. Endocrine cells appear in the appendix of the human fetus at around the 11th week of development. These endocrine cells of the fetal appendix have been shown to produce various biogenic amines and peptide hormones, compounds that assist with various biological control (homeostatic) mechanisms. There had been little prior evidence of this or any other role of the appendix in animal research, because the appendix does not exist in domestic mammals.
"Among adult humans, the appendix is now thought to be involved primarily in immune functions. Lymphoid tissue begins to accumulate in the appendix shortly after birth and reaches a peak between the second and third decades of life, decreasing rapidly thereafter and practically disappearing after the age of 60. During the early years of development, however, the appendix has been shown to function as a lymphoid organ, assisting with the maturation of B lymphocytes (one variety of white blood cell) and in the production of the class of antibodies known as immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies. Researchers have also shown that the appendix is involved in the production of molecules that help to direct the movement of lymphocytes to various other locations in the body.
"In this context, the function of the appendix appears to be to expose white blood cells to the wide variety of antigens, or foreign substances, present in the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, the appendix probably helps to suppress potentially destructive humoral (blood- and lymph-borne) antibody responses while promoting local immunity. The appendix--like the tiny structures called Peyer's patches in other areas of the gastrointestinal tract--takes up antigens from the contents of the intestines and reacts to these contents. This local immune system plays a vital role in the physiological immune response and in the control of food, drug, microbial or viral antigens. The connection between these local immune reactions and inflammatory bowel diseases, as well as autoimmune reactions in which the individual's own tissues are attacked by the immune system, is currently under investigation.
"In the past, the appendix was often routinely removed and discarded during other abdominal surgeries to prevent any possibility of a later attack of appendicitis; the appendix is now spared in case it is needed later for reconstructive surgery if the urinary bladder is removed. In such surgery, a section of the intestine is formed into a replacement bladder, and the appendix is used to re-create a 'sphincter muscle' so that the patient remains continent (able to retain urine). In addition, the appendix has been successfully fashioned into a makeshift replacement for a diseased ureter, allowing urine to flow from the kidneys to the bladder. As a result, the appendix, once regarded as a nonfunctional tissue, is now regarded as an important 'back-up' that can be used in a variety of reconstructive surgical techniques. It is no longer routinely removed and discarded if it is healthy.
aslam o alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu
Bhai there are words of two non muslims (from wat i can tell) im listening to them and SubhanAllah its really true what they spoke, alot of people say we are blinded by faith so we dont see the truth well what about them:
1st guy:
ANother scientist:
same guy comment "
SubhanAllah, you gotto understand the evolution theory thou how everything came from one rna molecule, no matter how many flaws there are or proof against human coming from apes, they are still going to promote it so it fits into their phylogenetic tree or dogma of life
Critical .... healthy.
I read this on wiki if I recall correctly. It was in response to Kent Hovind's "Lies in the textbook". I am not able to find it right now."Vestige is not an organ that has no function but an organ that has lost it's "original" function."
Let’s look at each one a little closer:
The human tailbone is the anchor point for nine little muscles needed to support the colon, anchor the end of the spinal column, and perform several other functions.
The whale does not have a pelvis. Those bones are anchor points for special muscles used during reproduction. The bones of the male whales differ from those of the female. Furthermore, there is no fossil evidence for loss of legs in whales.
The spurs on the abdomen of some snakes are also used in mating. We had a fifteen-and-a-half-foot python snake skin at the ministry. You could see the two little half-inch claws; each is attached to a tine bone about two inches long. They are not remnants of legs.
The human appendix serves as a part of the immune system today. It’s true that you can live without it. So what? You can live without both of your legs, arms, ears, and eyes as well. That doesn’t prove you don’t need them! Removal of the appendix causes the rest of the immune system to work harder, that’s all. People without their appendix are more likely to live shorter lives and catch more diseases.
Kent Hovind is scientifically illiterate.
Here is an example for whales, complete with photos of the transitional forms.
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/the-hind-legs-of-whales/
And a brilliant academic page on this, complete with numerous academic articles at the bottom:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gingeric/PDGwhales/Whales.htm
There are four stages in the evolution of the whale from the earlier ancestor that lived on land. Three of the four stages have been discovered. We are lucky to have any of them. But that's not to say the remaining one will not be discovered.
To say there is no evidence of whales having legs in the fossil record is just plainly wrong. The same is also true with snakes.
Kent Hovind isn't someone I'd take on evolution very seriously but the following is relevent so I'm sharing it:
Assalaam alaikum,
First and foremost..you are absolutely wrong about Islam and Muslims. The only thing in life that is 100% Absolute is the Quran.
Do not take science to be your god. It helps us to discover the beauty of Creation and the unity of creation.
Gravity. It is the weakest of the forces. What we knew about gravity is changing. Einstein, the atheist, was wrong. Science can be used for propaganda. What do you think Einstein did?! He was not innocent.
Do not belittle the faith of a person if they disagree with you. There is no mention of evolution in the Quran. In the Quran it clearly explains to us how Adam was created. As a Believer that is it.
For many the cure of diseases is found in the first sura of the Quran.
I sincerely believe that you need to take the time to educate yourself in Islam to develop a more sound understanding of the love that Muslims have for science.
Currently, you are coming across as an arrogant youth. Do not do that. It is well and good to be educated. It is good to have a Ph.D. For some it is not necessary. It is not the sign of intelligence. It is a sign of a person who has limited knowledge in a field. The next candidate has the full opportunity in gaining a Ph.D by tearing apart yours.
And you have no qualifications to point fingers at Muslims.
I wish you the best in your endeavor.