Iranian Weapons found in Syria supporting the Allawi Regime
- Thread starter Salem9022
- Start date
sister herb
Official TTI Chef
:salam2:
Both Iran and shia clerics have already told they don´t support violence of Syrian government.
Syrian president isn´t anything else than arab dictator. Saying he is shia doesn´t change anything. He is dictator.
Both Iran and shia clerics have already told they don´t support violence of Syrian government.
Syrian president isn´t anything else than arab dictator. Saying he is shia doesn´t change anything. He is dictator.
sister herb
Official TTI Chef
:salam2:
Iran has told they don´t support this dictator as I just wrote.
Both Iran and shia clerics have already told they don´t support violence of Syrian government.
queenislam
★★★I LOVE ALLAH★★★
~~~
:salam2:
Will this make America
part of them if they were to find American's
weapons???
Just anybody from
any country can make and do purchase for weapons
from any country that's include Iran,America even Israel!
Only money talks well here!
That's the deal.
~Wassalam
Bashar never called himself a Sunni because he isnt a Sunni. He is a Shia Allawi. They are extremist Shias who acount for 10% of Syria.
And the only country which is helping the Allawi regime in Syria is Iran.
"Turkey intercepted an arms shipment from Iran to Syria in August. In March, Turkish authorities also seized the cargo of an Iranian plane bound for Syria because the shipment violated U.N. sanctions. Turkish media said the aircraft was carrying light weapons, including automatic rifles, rocket launchers and mortars.
Erdogan said this week that Turkey was coordinating its efforts with the U.S. Washington has called on Syrian President Bashar Assad to resign and imposed sanctions on some Syrian officials, blocked assets they may have in the U.S. and banned any U.S. import of Syrian oil or petroleum products. Erdogan told Turkish journalists after talks with President Barack Obama in New York late Tuesday that he was no longer in contact with Syria's leadership. "I have cut all contacts with the Syrian administration," Erdogan said. "We never wanted things to arrive at this point, but unfortunately, the Syrian administration has forced us to take such a decision."
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2094763,00.html#ixzz1Yy4FQZ8E
No matter what those Shia Mullahs say they are known for Taqiyaah because their religon makes Taqiyaah permissible. 90% of their religion is based on Taqiyaah.
"YES.I BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAID"
That's so hypocritical as they did the same in 2009 (see 'Green Revolution Iran' ) when protestors took to the street after the rigged elections. They let loose street militias also known as 'Basijis' who butchered people on the streets, college campuses and personal homes. Quite sad.
Hard Rock Moslem
I'm your brother
Whatever he is, no brother don't too quick labelling him as kafir. Unless he declares openly then it will be different story. His days in office is up very soon, truth will prevail after his downfall. Let's pray for that to happen quickly.
Hatty
Junior Member
Ruling on the Nusayri/Alawi Sect
The following is to support what I claimed in my previous post. May Allah forgive our mistakes. Allah knows best. Ameen.
Ruling on the Nusayri/Alawi Sect
What follows is Imam ibn Taymiyyah’s, may Allah have mercy on him, answer to a question posed to him about the sect called an-Nusayriyyah (in English they are also known as Alawis/Alawite sect).
The question is very long, as it mentions many Nusayri beliefs and practices, and most of it is not translated for the sake of brevity.
Those who want to see the question in full, they can refer to Ibn Taymiyyah’s Fatawa 35/145. In summary, the questioner mentioned, among other things their legalization of intoxicants, belief in reincarnation; disbelief in resurrection, Paradise and Hellfire; belief that “Five Prayers” (as-Salawat al-Khams) is an expression referring to five names: “`Ali, Hasan, Husayn, Muhsin and Fatimah”, and that mentioning these five names suffices one instead of making ghusl from major impurity, or ablution, or fulfilling other conditions and obligatory actions of the five daily prayers; that `Ali is the creator of the heavens and the earth, and that he is their god in heavens and imam on the earth etc.
What follows is the end of the question and Ibn Tayiyyah’s answer.
Question:
“…Is it permissible for a Muslim (man or woman) to marry them (Nusayris)? Is it permissible to eat the meat of cattle they slaughter? What is the ruling on eating the cheese made from the rennet of their sacrificed animals? What is the ruling on using their dishes and clothes? Is it permissible to bury them with Muslims? Is it permissible to employ them in Muslim ports and handing the ports over to them? Or is it obligatory upon the ruler to cut them off and employ others from among qualified Muslim men; and is there a sin in delaying their explusion?”
Answer:
All Praise is for Allah, Lord of all worlds. These people named “Al-Nusayriyyah”, and other groups from among the Qaraamitah and Baatiniyyah, are greater disbelievers than the Jews and Christians. Nay, they are greater disbelievers than most of the mushrikeen (polytheists from other than Ahl ul-Kitab), and their harm to the Ummah of Muhammad, sallallahu alaihi wa sallam, is greater than the harm of the disbelievers who are in war with Muslims, such as at-Tatar, disbelieving Europeans and others.
For they present themselves in front of ignorant Muslims as supporters and advocates of Ahl ul Bayt, while in reality they do not believe in Allah, or the Messenger, or the Book, or [Allah’s] orders, or prohibitions, or reward, or punishment, or Paradise, or Fire, or in one of the Messengers before Muhammad, sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam, or in a religion from among previous religions. Rather, they take the words of Allah and His Messenger, known to the scholars of Muslims, and they interpret them based on their fabrications, claiming that their interpretations are “hidden knowledge (“ilm `ul-baatin”), such as what the questioner mentioned and more. They have no limit in their unbelief with regards to Allah’s Names, His verses, and their distortion of the Speech of Allah, the Most High, and His Messenger from their proper places [usages]. Their aim is repudiation of Islamic Beliefs and Laws in every possible way, trying to make it appear that these matters have realities that they know, like those mentioned by the questioner and others, such as that “five prayers” means knowledge of their secrets, “obligatory fast” hiding of their secrets, and “pilgrimage to Bayt al-`Atiq” visit to their shaikhs, and that the two hands of Abu Lahab represent Abu Bakr and Umar, and that “the great news and the manifest imam” (an naba’ul `adheem wal imaamul mubin) is `Ali ibn Abi Talib.
There are well known incidents and books they have written with regards to their enmity to Islam and its people. When they have an opportunity, they spill the blood of Muslims, such as when they once killed pilgrims and threw them into the well of Zamzam. Once they took the black stone and it stayed with them for a period of time, and they have killed so many Muslim scholars and elders that only Allah knows their number. They wrote many books, such as what the questioner mentioned, and others.
Muslim scholars have written books, unveiling their secrets, exposing their veils, explaining what they are upon from disbelief, infidelity and atheism, by which they are greater disbelievers than the Jews, Christians, and Indian idol-worshipping Brahmans.
What the questioner mentioned as their description is a little from a great deal that is known to the scholars regarding their characteristics. It is known to us that the coast of Sham was only taken over by the Christians from their (Nusayri) side. And also that they are always on the side of every enemy against Muslims, so [you find that] they are with Christians against Muslims.
From the greatest afflictions that have befallen them are Muslims’ opening conquest of the coast (of Sham) and defeat of the Christians. Nay, one of the greatest afflictions that has befallen them is Muslims’ victory over Tatar, and from the greatest holidays for them is the Christians conquest – and refuge is sought with Allah the Most High – of Muslim ports.
They don’t admit that this world has a Creator that created it, or that He has a religion that he orders with, or that He has a place with which He will reward people for their deeds, other than this place (in this world).
[Majmoo` al-Faatwaa 35/145]
Source:
http://shaykhulislaam.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/ruling-on-the-nusayrialawi-sect/
:salam2:
The following is to support what I claimed in my previous post. May Allah forgive our mistakes. Allah knows best. Ameen.
Ruling on the Nusayri/Alawi Sect
What follows is Imam ibn Taymiyyah’s, may Allah have mercy on him, answer to a question posed to him about the sect called an-Nusayriyyah (in English they are also known as Alawis/Alawite sect).
The question is very long, as it mentions many Nusayri beliefs and practices, and most of it is not translated for the sake of brevity.
Those who want to see the question in full, they can refer to Ibn Taymiyyah’s Fatawa 35/145. In summary, the questioner mentioned, among other things their legalization of intoxicants, belief in reincarnation; disbelief in resurrection, Paradise and Hellfire; belief that “Five Prayers” (as-Salawat al-Khams) is an expression referring to five names: “`Ali, Hasan, Husayn, Muhsin and Fatimah”, and that mentioning these five names suffices one instead of making ghusl from major impurity, or ablution, or fulfilling other conditions and obligatory actions of the five daily prayers; that `Ali is the creator of the heavens and the earth, and that he is their god in heavens and imam on the earth etc.
What follows is the end of the question and Ibn Tayiyyah’s answer.
Question:
“…Is it permissible for a Muslim (man or woman) to marry them (Nusayris)? Is it permissible to eat the meat of cattle they slaughter? What is the ruling on eating the cheese made from the rennet of their sacrificed animals? What is the ruling on using their dishes and clothes? Is it permissible to bury them with Muslims? Is it permissible to employ them in Muslim ports and handing the ports over to them? Or is it obligatory upon the ruler to cut them off and employ others from among qualified Muslim men; and is there a sin in delaying their explusion?”
Answer:
All Praise is for Allah, Lord of all worlds. These people named “Al-Nusayriyyah”, and other groups from among the Qaraamitah and Baatiniyyah, are greater disbelievers than the Jews and Christians. Nay, they are greater disbelievers than most of the mushrikeen (polytheists from other than Ahl ul-Kitab), and their harm to the Ummah of Muhammad, sallallahu alaihi wa sallam, is greater than the harm of the disbelievers who are in war with Muslims, such as at-Tatar, disbelieving Europeans and others.
For they present themselves in front of ignorant Muslims as supporters and advocates of Ahl ul Bayt, while in reality they do not believe in Allah, or the Messenger, or the Book, or [Allah’s] orders, or prohibitions, or reward, or punishment, or Paradise, or Fire, or in one of the Messengers before Muhammad, sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam, or in a religion from among previous religions. Rather, they take the words of Allah and His Messenger, known to the scholars of Muslims, and they interpret them based on their fabrications, claiming that their interpretations are “hidden knowledge (“ilm `ul-baatin”), such as what the questioner mentioned and more. They have no limit in their unbelief with regards to Allah’s Names, His verses, and their distortion of the Speech of Allah, the Most High, and His Messenger from their proper places [usages]. Their aim is repudiation of Islamic Beliefs and Laws in every possible way, trying to make it appear that these matters have realities that they know, like those mentioned by the questioner and others, such as that “five prayers” means knowledge of their secrets, “obligatory fast” hiding of their secrets, and “pilgrimage to Bayt al-`Atiq” visit to their shaikhs, and that the two hands of Abu Lahab represent Abu Bakr and Umar, and that “the great news and the manifest imam” (an naba’ul `adheem wal imaamul mubin) is `Ali ibn Abi Talib.
There are well known incidents and books they have written with regards to their enmity to Islam and its people. When they have an opportunity, they spill the blood of Muslims, such as when they once killed pilgrims and threw them into the well of Zamzam. Once they took the black stone and it stayed with them for a period of time, and they have killed so many Muslim scholars and elders that only Allah knows their number. They wrote many books, such as what the questioner mentioned, and others.
Muslim scholars have written books, unveiling their secrets, exposing their veils, explaining what they are upon from disbelief, infidelity and atheism, by which they are greater disbelievers than the Jews, Christians, and Indian idol-worshipping Brahmans.
What the questioner mentioned as their description is a little from a great deal that is known to the scholars regarding their characteristics. It is known to us that the coast of Sham was only taken over by the Christians from their (Nusayri) side. And also that they are always on the side of every enemy against Muslims, so [you find that] they are with Christians against Muslims.
From the greatest afflictions that have befallen them are Muslims’ opening conquest of the coast (of Sham) and defeat of the Christians. Nay, one of the greatest afflictions that has befallen them is Muslims’ victory over Tatar, and from the greatest holidays for them is the Christians conquest – and refuge is sought with Allah the Most High – of Muslim ports.
They don’t admit that this world has a Creator that created it, or that He has a religion that he orders with, or that He has a place with which He will reward people for their deeds, other than this place (in this world).
[Majmoo` al-Faatwaa 35/145]
Source:
http://shaykhulislaam.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/ruling-on-the-nusayrialawi-sect/
:salam2:
his followers hold him above everything,,,saying about him words we should only use for ALLAh...he has destroyed mosques and shot Imams ,what kind of muslim does that make him???
Hard Rock Moslem
I'm your brother
My dearest brother and sister,
Firstly, allow me to admit that I'm with our brothers and sisters in Syria. At no time I will ever support this Bashar.
I acknowledge all the atrocities committed by this animal man because I do follow latest development in Syria. I'm praying for them.
I've read about this sect, of course this is not Islam. If I've the authority to make fatwa, surely I will make one for him...
But we are laymen Muslims. I'm not comfortable calling him kaffir... I also read somewhere that he declared himself a Muslim.
In Islam, we must have 100% certain that he is kaffir, must reach the level of "yakeen" only then we should give fatwa.
We can't make conclusion like in secular system, a person will be found guilty when proven "beyond reasonable doubt".
Let we pray for Allah to give victory to our brothers and sisters in Syria.
If I said anything wrong, pls accept my apology.
Firstly, allow me to admit that I'm with our brothers and sisters in Syria. At no time I will ever support this Bashar.
I acknowledge all the atrocities committed by this animal man because I do follow latest development in Syria. I'm praying for them.
I've read about this sect, of course this is not Islam. If I've the authority to make fatwa, surely I will make one for him...
But we are laymen Muslims. I'm not comfortable calling him kaffir... I also read somewhere that he declared himself a Muslim.
In Islam, we must have 100% certain that he is kaffir, must reach the level of "yakeen" only then we should give fatwa.
We can't make conclusion like in secular system, a person will be found guilty when proven "beyond reasonable doubt".
Let we pray for Allah to give victory to our brothers and sisters in Syria.
If I said anything wrong, pls accept my apology.